1. For SoLID Collaboration Meeting Spokespersons Jian-Ping Chen (JLab) Jin Huang (MIT) Yi Qiang (JLab) Wenbiao Yan (USTC, China)

2.  Azimuthal Asym. in SIDIS π ± production ◦ longitudinally polarized 3 He target ◦ SoLID spectrometer (Same setup as E12-10-006) ◦ High precision, Multi-dimensional mapping of A UL, A LT, A LL for neutron  To study ◦ Quark spin-orbit correlations through “worm-gear” TMD PDFs  Beam requests ◦ 35 PAC days of 11GeV and 8.8GeV Beam, 15uA ◦ Beam pol. = 85%, same for E12-10-006 SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 2

3.  Comparing to PVDIS (same for 12GeV Transversity) ◦ SIDIS SoLID detector package  Reconfiguration for the forward region  Add large angle electron detection ◦ Polarized He-3 Target  Achieved performance quoted  Comparing to 12GeV Transversity ◦ Longitudinal polarization of He-3 target  Already used in 6GeV program: Target support both Longitudinal & Transverse polarization ◦ Polarized beam is important for both experiment  Standard Hall A pol. already satisfy requirement SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 3 SoLID 11/8.8GeV CEBAF Beam P P Polarimetry: Moller & Compton Polarimetry: Moller & Compton e’ π±π± 3 He Target Spin

4.  TMD PDFs link ◦ Intrinsic motion of partons ◦ Parton spin ◦ Spin of the nucleon  Multi-Dimension structure ◦ Probes orbital motion of quarks  A new phase of study, fast developing field ◦ Great advance in theories (factorization, models, Lattice...) ◦ Not sys. studied until recent years  Semi-Inclusive DIS (SIDIS): HERMES, COMPASS, Jlab-6GeV,...  p-p(p_bar) process : FNAL, BNL,... SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 4 in DIS Nucleon -> Plate L ≠ ? 0 →Transverse motion L ≠ ? 0 →Transverse motion

5. 5 f 1T  = h1 =h1 = h1 =h1 = h 1T  = Transversity Boer-Mulders Pretzelosity Sivers Helicity f 1 = g 1 = g 1T = SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang Worm Gear : This proposal, T-even Nucleon Spin Quark Spin h 1L  = Worm Gear (Kotzinian-Mulders)

6.   Leading twist TMD PDFs  Dominated by real part of interference between L=0 (S) and L=1 (P) states ◦ Imaginary part -> Boer- Mulders effect, Sivers effect  No GPD correspondence ◦ a genuine sign of intrinsic transverse motion SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 6 Worm Gear h 1L  = g 1T = Light-Cone CQM by B. Pasquini B.P., Cazzaniga, Boffi, PRD78, 2008 h 1L ⊥ (1) S-P int. P-D int.

7.  So far using simplified straight gauge links  “Worm-gear” TMDs → dipole shift @ Trans Mom. SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 7 Spin: Nucleon (T), Quark (L) Spin: Nucleon (L), Quark (T) B. Musch, et. al. arXiv:0908.1283; 1011.1213, m π ~500GeV - u d ud

8.  Generic features of model predictions: ◦ max @ valence x region ◦ ~ a few percent w.r.t. unpolarized f 1 ◦ u & d quarks take opposite signs  h 1L  = ? -g 1T ◦ Supported by many models and favored by current Lattice SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 8 Kotzinian, PRD73, 2006Avakian, PRD77, 2008

9. Hall A A LT on 3 He CLAS A UL on proton SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 9 g 1T u > ? 0 d quark in neutron dominant A LT (n→π - ) π-π- π+π+ u in proton dominant A LT (n→π - ) u in proton dominant A LT (n→π - ) h 1L < ? 0 ⊥u

10.  “Worm-gear” TMDs → collinear PDFs through ◦ Lorentz Invariance Relations (LIR) ◦ Wandzura-Wilczek (WW) approximation ◦ Assumptions: q-g correlation small, m q small   Test with collinear PDFs to probe q-g correlation  Indirect information on Transversity, h 1 SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 10 and

11.  Access new TMDs not accessible in inclusive DIS (m quark =0)  Variables: x, q, Q 2, z, W, W’ SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 11 P xP q, Q 2 k k’ P h /z W’ W

12. SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 12 f 1 = Sivers f 1T  = Transversity h 1T = Boer-Mulder h1 =h1 = Pretzelosity h 1T  = S L, S T : Target Polarization; e : Beam Polarization h 1L  = Worm Gear g 1T = Worm Gear g 1 = Helicity

13. A UL → h 1L A LT → g 1T  Single Beam Asymmetry:  Double Spin Asymmetry: 13 Target Spin e e’ π X n e π X n Target Spin Systematic uncertainty improved with Fast spin/helicity flips Large & Symmetric acceptance Φ h coverage is important

14.  A UL (→ h 1L  ) ◦ No neutron data to date ◦ Proton (HERMES, CLAS) ◦ Deuteron (COMPASS, HERMES)  A LT (→ g 1T ) ◦ First Neutron A LT : 6GeV Transversity ◦ Deuteron A LT : COMPASS ◦ New proton data reported in Apr SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 14 New: HERMES Proton ALT Pappalardo, DIS2011

15.  Projection of a single Q 2 -z bin for π + (35 PAC day) SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 15 Center of points: Scale for error bars:

16. z= 0.3~0.7 Q 2 = 1~8 GeV 2 P h⊥ (GeV/c) x bj Scale for error bars : π + A UL SoLID Collaboration Meeting 16Jin Huang

17.  DSA on long. pol. 3 He, A LL → helicity g 1 (x,p T )  Contribute to global analysis ◦ Quark flavor tagged by detected meson ◦ Significantly reduce uncertainty on Δd  p T dependency of A LL ◦ flavor dep. of p T width ~ different OAM of quarks arXiv:0705.1553 SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 17 CLAS proton A LL, arXiv:1003.4549

18.  SIDIS charged pion production ultimate precision 4D mapping of asym.  Extraction of novel TMDs ◦ A UL → h 1L ◦ A LT → g 1T ◦ A LL → g 1L : p T dep. helicity distribution, Δd  Major role in worldwide efforts ◦ Spin-orbit effects & 3D structure of nucleon  Long. pol. 3 He target + SoLID  35-day pol. beam SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 18 “worm-gear” distribution, Re[(L=0) q × (L=1) q ]

19.  Slides1: Summarize physics case ◦ Introducing from spin problem ◦ “worm-gear” distribution, Re[(L=0) q × (L=1) q ] ◦ Feature of setup  polarized beam, long. polarized target  35PAC day for a meaningful measurement of small h 1L  Slides2: More details ◦ Lattice calculation ◦ Model prediction, testing h 1L  = ? -g 1T ◦ WW-relations, connection to g 1, h 1  One/two slides on technical progress SoLID Collaboration Meeting Jin Huang 19