Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Nanophysics II Michael Hietschold Solid Surfaces Analysis Group & Electron Microscopy Laboratory Institute of Physics Portland State University, May 2005.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Nanophysics II Michael Hietschold Solid Surfaces Analysis Group & Electron Microscopy Laboratory Institute of Physics Portland State University, May 2005."— Presentation transcript:

1 Nanophysics II Michael Hietschold Solid Surfaces Analysis Group & Electron Microscopy Laboratory Institute of Physics Portland State University, May 2005

2 2nd Lecture 3b. Surfaces and Interfaces – Electronic Structure 3.3. Electronic Structure of Surfaces 3.4. Structure of Interfaces 4. Semiconductor Heterostructures 4.1. Quantum Wells 4.2. Tunnelling Structures

3 3b. Surfaces and Interfaces – Electronic Structure 3.3. Electronic Structure of Surfaces 3.4. Structure of Interfaces

4 3.3. Electronic Structure of Surfaces Projected Energy Band Structure: Lattice not any longer periodic along the sur- face normal k ┴ not any longer a good quantum number - Projected bulk bands - Surface state bands

5 Surface States Two types of electronic states: - Truncated bulk states - Surface states

6 Surface states splitting from semiconductor bulk bands may act as additional donor or acceptor states

7 Interplay with Surface Reconstruction The appearance and occupation of surface state bands may ener- getically favour special surface reconstruc- tions

8 3.4. Structure of Interfaces General Principle: µ 1 = µ 2 in thermodynamic equilibrium 12 For electrons this means, there should be a common Fermi level !

9 Metal-Metal Interfaces Adjustment of Fermi levels – Contact potential ΔV 12 = Φ 2 – Φ 1

10 Metal – Semiconductor Interfaces Small density of free electrons in the semiconductor – Considerable screening length (Debye length) – Band bending Schottky barrier at the interface

11 Semiconductor-Semiconductor Interfaces Within small distances from the interface (and at low doping levels) - band bending may be neglected - rigid band edges; effective square-well potentials for the electrons and holes. E c1 E c2 E v1 E v2 E F1 E F2 E F

12 4.Semiconductor Heterostructures 4.1. Quantum Wells 4.2. Tunnelling Structures 4.3. Superlattices

13 4.1. Quantum Wells Effective potential structures consisting of well defined semiconductor-semiconductor interfaces z E EcEc EvEv Ideal crystalline interfaces – Epitaxy GaAs/Al x Ga 1-x As

14 Preparation by Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE) Allows controlled deposition of atomic monolayers and complex structures consisting of them - UHV - slow deposition (close to equilibrium) - dedicated in-situ analysis

15 One-dimensional quantum well – from a stupid exercise inquantum mechanics (calculating the stationary bound states)for a fictituous system to real samples and device structures - V 0 0 E -a 0 a [ - ħ 2 /2m d 2 /dx 2 + V(x) ] φ(x) = E φ(x) solving by ansatz method A + cos (kx)| x | < a φ + (x) = A + cos (ka) e κ (a - x) x > a A + cos (ka) e κ (a + x) x < - a, A - sin (kx)| x | < a φ - (x) = A - sin (ka) e κ (a - x) x > a - A - sin (ka) e κ (a + x) x < - a κ = √ - 2m E / ħ 2,k = √ 2m {E – (- V 0 )} / ħ 2.

16 From stationary Schroedinger`s equation (smoothly matching the ansatz wave functions as well as their 1st derivatives): | cos (ka) / ( ka ) | = 1 / C tan (ka) > 0 | sin (ka) / (ka) | = 1 / C tan (ka) < 0 C 2 = 2mV 0 / ħ 2 a 2. Graphical represenation  discrete stationary solutions 1 / C

17 Finite number of stationary bound states Eigenfunctions and energy level spectrum

18 Dependence of the energy spectrum on the parameter C 2 = 2mV 0 / ħ 2 a 2

19 Quantum Dots – Superatoms (spherical symmetry) Can be prepared e.g. by self-organized island growth

20 E V(x) V0V0 s 4.2. Tunneling Structures Tunneling through a potential well

21 Tunneling probability Wave function within the wall (classically „forbidden“) φ in wall ~ exp (- κ s); κ = √2m(V 0 -E)/ħ 2 Transmission probability T ~ |φ(s)| 2 ~ exp (- 2 κ s) For solid state physics barrier heights of a few eV there is measurable tunneling for s of a few nm only.

22 Resonance tunneling double-barrier structure If E corresponds to the energy of a (quasistationary) state within the double- barrier T goes to 1 !!! Interference effect similar to Fabry-Perot interferometer

23 I-V characteristics shows negative differential resistance I U NDR


Download ppt "Nanophysics II Michael Hietschold Solid Surfaces Analysis Group & Electron Microscopy Laboratory Institute of Physics Portland State University, May 2005."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google