Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg.

Published byBeverly Osborne Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg."— Presentation transcript:

1 Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg MD, Virender S Sangwan MD Cornea & anterior segment service LV Prasad Eye Institute Hyderabad India None of the authors have any financial interest in the subject matter of the presentation

2 Purpose: To review the clinical profile of graft detachment following Descemet’s stripping endothelia keratoplasty (DSEK) and analyze the outcomes of re-bubbling for graft detachment. Design: Retrospective case review

3 Methods 309 eyes underwent DSEK from January 2009 to February 2010 27 eyes (8.7%) developed graft detachment 20 males and 7 females; age range 23 to 82 years Graft detachment: complete/total if there was no area of contact between the lenticule and the host posterior stroma partial/incomplete if there was some extent of apposition of the graft with the posterior stroma re-bubbling with air with or without repositioning if complete dislocation, partial detachment with communication with anterior chamber and significant decentration

4 Indication for surgeryPseudophakic corneal edema: 12 patients Aphakic corneal edema: 6 patients Failed graft: 4 patients Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: 4 patients Silicon oil induced keratopathy: 1 patient Surgical interventionDSEK only- 11 patients Anterior vitrectomy+ DSEK- 9 patients IOL Exchange+ DSEK - 11 patients Cataract surgery+DSEK-5 patients Lens statusPhakic: 3 eyes Pseudophakic: 21 eyes (ACIOL 9; SFIOL 2; PCIOL 10) Aphakic: 3 eyes Surgical dataDonor dissection: Manual 3; Microkeratome 24 DM Stripping: 26 eyes Venting incisions: 25 eyes Donor characteristicsDonor grade: Good 18; Very good 7; Excellent 2 Age range: 9 months to 85 years, Mean= 53.25 years Mean endothelial cell density: 2803 cells/mm 2 Surgical parameters

5 Nature of detachment Total=18 eyes (66.6%) Partial =9 eyes (33.3%) Interval between detachment and rebubbling Average 1.18 days, Range 1-4 days Number of rebubbling procedures Once = 24 patients (88.8%) Twice = 3 patients (11.1%) Outcome of rebubbling Successful graft attachment *20/27 (74%) [ Total=12; Partial=8] Persistent detachment 7/27 (25.9%) *3 patients who underwent second attempt of rebubbling had successful graft attachment Final outcomeClear graft 13/20 (65%) [Total=7/12; Partial=6/8] Primary graft failure 7 /20 (35%) Outcomes

6 No INDICATION Detachment Surgery Lens StatusVenting Donor ECD Second intervention OUTCOME 1 PCETOTAL IOL exchange + AV+ DSAEKACIOL +2994 Repeat Rebubbling Attached, failed graft 2 Failed graftTOTAL DSAEKphakic +2666 Repeat Rebubbling Attached, failed graft 3 ACETOTAL DSAEKNo IOL +3861 Repeat Rebubbling Attached, failed graft 4 PCETOTAL IOL Exchange+ AV+DSAEKSFIOL -2463RE DSEKclear graft 5 Failed graftTOTAL DSAEKPCIOL + 2941RE DSEKclear graft 6 FuchsTOTAL Phaco+AV+ PCIOL+DSAEKPCIOL + 4255RE DSEKclear graft 7 FuchsTOTAL Phaco+ AV+ ACIOL+DSAEKACIOL +2638PKclear graft 8 PCETOTAL AV+ IOL Exchange+ DSAEKACIOL -2967PKclear graft 9 PCETOTAL IOL Exchange +AV+ DSAEKACIOL +2915RE DSEKclear graft 10 ACEPARTIAL DSAEKNo IOL +2227 PKclear graft Clinical and surgical data of patients with Persistent detachment after first Rebubbling

7 Parameters No Persistent detachment (N=10) [95% CI] Successful reattachment (N=17) [95% CI] Odd ratio [95%CI] p value Aphakia 3 2 /10(20%) [3.54 to 55.78%] 1/17(5.88%) [0.31 to 30.76%] 4 [0.31 to 51.03] 0.54 Pseudophakia 21 7/10(70%) [35.37 to 91.91%] 14/17(82.3%) [55.8 to 95.33%] 0.5 [0.08 to 3.15] 0.64 Phakic 3 1/10(10%) [0.52 to 45.88%] 2/17(11.7%) [2.06 to37.74%] 0.83 [0.07 to 10.55] 1.00 Prior vitrectomy 2 1/10(10%) [0.52 to 45.88%] 1/17(5.88%) [0.31 to 30.76%] 1.78 [0.10 to 31.98] 1.00 Additional Vitrectomy 9 6/10(60%) [27.37 to 86.31%] 3/17(17.6%) [4.67 to 44.20%] 7 [1.18 to 41.36] 0.04 Mean ECD(Cells/mm 2 ) 2992.7±619.692691.53±285.81 0.10 Preservation time (hrs) 29.5±18.2433.53±18.4 0.38 Age of donor (years)43.98±24.558.71±15.680.07 Risk factors for persistent graft detachment after unsuccessful first re-bubbling intervention

8 Conclusions Graft dislocation rate 8.7%, all noted within the first week of surgery Graft detachment may be anticipated more commonly in aphakic and vitrectomised eyes additional vitrectomy at the time of surgery is a significant risk factor for persistent graft detachment

Download ppt "Risk Factors and Outcomes of Donor Lenticule Dislocation Following DSEK Pravin K Vaddavalli MD, Suntia Chaurasia MD, Muralidhar Ramappa MD, Prashant Garg."

Similar presentations

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group

Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group
Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.

Comparison of Endothelial Cell Count by Manual and Automated Methods in Normal Corneas and in Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy Somasheila I Murthy, Debarun.
Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?

Venting Incisions in DSAEK Patients: Is It an Absolute Necessity?
Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,

Use of a Novel Y- Suture Technique to Reduce Detachments in Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Habeeb Ahmad, MD Martin Heur,
Retrospective comparison of staged versus combined cataract surgery and Descemet’s-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with Fuchs’ Dystrophy.

Retrospective comparison of staged versus combined cataract surgery and Descemet’s-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in patients with Fuchs’ Dystrophy.
Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.

Early Outcomes of Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Pseudophakic Eyes with Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lenses Preeya K. Gupta.
Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.

Katsuya Yamazoe, MD, Takefumi Yamaguchi, MD, Kazuki Hotta, MD, Yoshiyuki Satake, MD, Kenji Konomi, MD, Seika Den, MD, Jun Shimazaki, MD Presented by: Abdulrahman.
Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**

Roy E Lehman MD*, Samuel F Fulcher MD**
Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.

Relationship Between Donor Graft Cell Count and Visual Outcome in DSAEK Patients Authors Silvin Bakalian MD PhD, Johanna Choremis MD FRCSC, Michele Mabon.
V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.

V. S. Liarakos, K. van Dijk, L. Ham, L. Baydoun and G.R.J. Melles Anterior Chamber vs Posterior Chamber IOL in DMEK for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.

Jeffrey J. Ing, MD, FACS, (Delta Eye Medical Group, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology) Thanh T. Nguyen, OD (Delta Eye.
Vitrectomy and silicone oil infusion in severe diabetic retinopathy. Alessandro Castellarin, MD Ruben Grigorian, MD Neelakshi Bhagat, MD Lucian DelPriore,

Vitrectomy and silicone oil infusion in severe diabetic retinopathy. Alessandro Castellarin, MD Ruben Grigorian, MD Neelakshi Bhagat, MD Lucian DelPriore,
Jatin Ashar1 1Mumbai Eye Care, Cornea and LASIK Centre

Jatin Ashar1 1Mumbai Eye Care, Cornea and LASIK Centre
Repeat DMEK for unsuccessful

Repeat DMEK for unsuccessful
Dislocation of the DSEK Donor Graft into the Posterior Segment An Intraoperative Complication in DSEK Surgery Mark M Fernandez MD, Mark S Gorovoy MD, George.

Dislocation of the DSEK Donor Graft into the Posterior Segment An Intraoperative Complication in DSEK Surgery Mark M Fernandez MD, Mark S Gorovoy MD, George.
Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis and Silicone Oil for the Treatment of Hypotony in Prephthisis Kristiana D. Neff 1, William I. Sawyer 2, Michael R. Petersen.

Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis and Silicone Oil for the Treatment of Hypotony in Prephthisis Kristiana D. Neff 1, William I. Sawyer 2, Michael R. Petersen.
Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.

Bryan Y Kim 1, Shintaro Kanayama MD PhD 1, Tueng T Shen MD PhD 1, Thomas E Gillette MD 2 1 University of Washington Department of Ophthalmology, 2 Eye.
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore

Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli

Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Lori Lombardi MD, Mark A. Terry MD, Neda Shamie MD, Anand K. Shah MD, Daniel J. Friend MS *Dr. Terry has a financial interest in Bausch & Lomb instruments.

Lori Lombardi MD, Mark A. Terry MD, Neda Shamie MD, Anand K. Shah MD, Daniel J. Friend MS *Dr. Terry has a financial interest in Bausch & Lomb instruments.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google