1. Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) 2010 1 9/22/2010

2. Test all public school students in grades 3 to 10. Performance is based on the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework learning standards; Students must pass the grade 10 tests in English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics and Science as one condition of eligibility for a high school diploma. Tests are administered over several weeks in the Spring each year. MCAS measures both individual student proficiency and district proficiency. In addition, MCAS will monitor progress on the No Child Left Behind federal law. 2 9/22/2010

3.  The MCAS is used to hold schools and districts accountable, on a yearly basis, for the progress they have made toward all students being proficient in Reading and Mathematics by 2014 as required by NCLB.  The measure used in determining (growth) is called Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). 3 9/22/2010

4. A ParticipationDid at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? B PerformanceDid the student group perform at or above the 2010 state performance target? C ImprovementDid the student group meet its own 2010 improvement target? D Additional Indicator Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination *AYP is measured by the Composite Performance Index (CPI) 4 9/22/2010

5. A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PARTICIPATION: Did at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? A 5 Dartmouth Public Schools 9/22/2010

6. Composite Performance Index (CPI) CPI: Multiply the number of points by the number of students at each performance level, then divide the total number of points by the total number of students (example below) 6 9/22/2010 B

7. District MCAS Results Scores reported as % of students in each category. 7 9/22/2010

8. A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PERFORMANCE: Did the student group perform at or above the 2010 performance target? B Composite Performance Index (CPI) 100 90 80 70 60 50 ELA Math 70.7 53.0 75.6 60.8 80.5 68.7 85.4 76.5 90.2 84.3 95.1 92.2 100 8 9/22/2010

9. A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PERFORMANCE: Did the student group perform at or above the 2010 performance target? B Composite Performance Index (CPI) 100 90 80 70 60 50 ELA Math 70.7 53.0 75.6 60.8 80.5 68.7 85.4 76.5 90.2 84.3 95.1 92.2 100 9 90.3 85.1 9/22/2010

10. A ParticipationDid at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? B PerformanceDid the student group perform at or above the 2010 state performance target? C ImprovementDid the student group meet its own 2010 improvement target? D Additional Indicator Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination *AYP is measured by the Composite Performance Index (CPI) 10 9/22/2010

11. A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination ADDITIONAL INDICATOR: Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? D 11 9/22/2010

12. Adequate Yearly Progress HistoryNCLB Accountability Status 20062007200820092010 English Language Arts AggregateYes No Status All Subgroups Yes No Math AggregateYes Improvement Year 1 Subgroups All Subgroups Yes No Yes 12 9/22/2010

13. 13

14. 9/22/2010 14

15.  Share information with community: post on website, parent reports sent home, web link to district data  Analysis – District Data Team: Results within the context of multiple measures (DIBELs, benchmarks, SAT)  District and School goals 15 9/22/2010

16. Appendix Additional information and data. 16 9/22/2010

17. Table of Contents  Definition of terms17  District Data18-19  NCLB Accountability Status20  Performance Rating21  Improvement Rating22  Joseph DeMello School Data23-25  George H. Potter School Data26-28  James M. Quinn School Data29-31  Dartmouth Middle School Data32-34  Dartmouth High School Data35-37 9/22/2010 17

18.  Aggregate – total number of students  Subgroups – Male Female Limited English Proficiency Special Education Low Income Black or African American Asian Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native White Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Multi-race, Non-Hispanic *Only subgroups which contain more than 40 students are considered official subgroups with values assigned. 18 9/22/2010

19. Dartmouth District 19 9/22/2010

20. Dartmouth District 20 9/22/2010

21. Dartmouth District 21 NCLB Accountability Status - The category to which a school is assigned based on its AYP determinations over multiple years, to define the required course of school, district and/or state action that must be taken to improve student performance. Accountability status categories include No Status, Improvement, Corrective Action Restructuring. A district or school is placed in an accountability status on the basis of the performance and improvement profile of students in the aggregate or of one or more student groups over two or more years in ELA and/or mathematics. Schools that make AYP in a subject for all student groups for two or more consecutive years are assigned to the positive No Status category. 9/22/2010

22. Dartmouth District 22 Performance Rating - Issued annually, a descriptive representation of aggregate student performance on MCAS tests. Schools and districts are assigned one of six performance rating categories based on their 2010 CPI: Very High (90 - 100); High (80 - 89.9); Moderate (70 - 79.9); Low (60 - 69.9); Very Low (40 - 59.9); and Critically Low (0 - 39 9/22/2010

23. Dartmouth District 23 Improvement Rating - Descriptive term corresponding to the amount of aggregate CPI gain a district achieved in 2008 as compared to 2007. The improvement that a district is expected to make from one year to the next is expressed not as a single numeric target, but as a target range. A district's improvement rating corresponds to its aggregate improvement gain: Above Target (improved above error band), On Target (improved within error band), Improved Below Target (improved above the baseline but below the error band), No Change (gain was equivalent to baseline plus or minus the error band), and Declined (gain was below baseline and below the error band). 9/22/2010

24. Joseph DeMello School 24 9/22/2010

25. Joseph DeMello School 25 9/22/2010

26. Joseph DeMello School 26 9/22/2010

27. George H. Potter School 27 9/22/2010

28. George H. Potter School 28 9/22/2010

29. Grade and Subject Advanced/ Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/ Failing Students Included CPI SCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATE GRADE 03 - READING111461492830187690.8 GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS2125574021241117691.8 GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 311514337359127881.4 GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS1716393242413117785.7 GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS 816524739281107785.4 GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS17254030322810177779.5 GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 1015473839364117785.4 George H. Potter School 29 9/22/2010

30. James M. Quinn School 30 9/22/2010

31. James M. Quinn School 31 9/22/2010

32. James M. Quinn School 32 9/22/2010

33. Dartmouth Middle School 33 9/22/2010

34. Dartmouth Middle School 34 9/22/2010

35. Dartmouth Middle School 35 9/22/2010

36. Dartmouth High School 36 9/22/2010

37. Dartmouth High School 37 9/22/2010

38. Dartmouth High School 38 9/22/2010