1. Experimental Areas Controls Review  AB/CO Viewpoint Vito Baggiolini (on behalf of the CESAR team and several people in CO)

2. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 2 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Color Code + Conventions Green: already done or no problems anticipated Orange: not yet 100% clear (potential non-critical problem) Red:critical problem, to be addressed urgently

3. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 3 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Standard Controls (“StdCtrls”) CESAR uses Standard CO controls where possible –JAPC: Communication services to the equipment on top of CMW –Middle tier services (data concentrators & elaborators, APIs,..) –On-line monitoring system for Logging, Fixed Displays, Statistics, SDDS –LHC Logging –Laser Alarm system –GUI building components (Java Dataviewer, Frame, beans, knobs, working sets,...) –Console manager –FESA, CMW, CMW-to-SL_Equip gateway Responsibilities: –CO: tools / services / components + support –Users (CESAR, BDI, OP): usage, configuration

4. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 4 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CESAR Project (Applications EA + CNGS) State at the end of Run 2004 –Successfully tested in PCR, operationally used in West Area –Some functionality missing –Performance bottleneck –Need to adapt some parts to new “standard controls” Ongoing Work 2005/06 –Address the above points –Adapt to external changes (migration to FESA, new timing, new access system, new standard controls services, …) Resources –FTEs in 2004: 1.7 (CO/AP), 0.5 (ATB/EA), 3 2 nd Jobs (OP/SPS) –FTEs in 2005: 1.1 (CO/AP), 0.3 (ATB/EA) –FTEs in 2006 (until startup): 2 (CO/AP), 0.3 (ATB/EA), ?? (OP/SPS) CESAR Team is currently working on LEIR…

5. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 5 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Equipment control affecting CO: ItemEqptsH/WFESWRole CODate New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XSCI,FISC, XDWC, XION,SCAL 2005FESACesar adaptations Dry r.1 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XCET 4Q05FESANew GUIDry r.2 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XEMC 1Q06FESANew GUI start-up VME-based CEDAR XCED mid-06FESANew GUI3Q06 MAGEA *) Power supplies OKFESA?Cesar Adapt Dry r.2 VME EQ-bus master Continue till 2007 with existing SL-Equip/Nodal software Eqpt Bus based HW port to FESA XWCA, Position contr (colls, tax, …) as nowFESACesar adaptations 1Q07 In/out motorisations e.g. ABSMIO okFESA PLC FE softw, Upgr GUI Dry r.1 Other PLC-based items e.g. IGOR okFESA PLC FE softw, New GUI Dry r.1 Access control via PLCBetween CO and TSDry r.1 *) Decision in October 2005 For reference Lau’s Slide

6. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 6 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Equipment control affecting CO: ItemEqptsH/WFESWRole CODate New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XSCI,FISC, XDWC, XION,SCAL 2005FESACesar adaptations Dry r.1 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XCET 4Q05FESANew GUIDry r.2 New BDI eqpt-ortd HW XEMC 1Q06FESANew GUI start-up VME-based CEDAR XCED mid-06FESANew GUI3Q06 MAGEA *) Power supplies OKFESA?Cesar Adapt Dry r.2 VME EQ-bus master Continue till 2007 with existing SL-Equip/Nodal software Eqpt Bus based HW port to FESA XWCA, Position contr (colls, tax, …) as nowFESACesar adaptations 1Q07 In/out motorisations e.g. ABSMIO okFESA PLC FE softw, Upgr GUI Dry r.1 Other PLC-based items e.g. IGOR okFESA PLC FE softw, New GUI Dry r.1 Access control via PLCBetween CO and TSDry r.1 *) Decision in October 2005 For reference CO implication well-defined and agreed on: Equipment converted to FESA (or not yet supported by CESAR) –Add functionality or adapt CESAR system  CESAR team –FESA development  Equipment groups –Exception: PLCs: First FESA implementation  CO/FC, (maintenance  BDI/SW) CO + CESAR do not implement specialist applications –To be done with standard controls solutions  Equipment Groups –Tools + Support  CO/AP –BUT: Minor changes in CESAR GUIs where useful  CESAR

7. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 7 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Lau’s Slide

8. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 8 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Agreed on.

9. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 9 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP  Nodal Support  CO/IN will support Nodal language on HP-UX 10.20 through 2006 (But no piquet-style support can be provided)  Compatibility with new timing needs to be confirmed  CMW-to-SL_Equip Gateway  CMW gateway now deployed on each VME FE, “reliability should be OK”.  If MAGEA is not ported to VME/FESA, CO/FC needs to invest work on GW. (CMW gateway cannot be deployed on old PC-486 front-ends)

10. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 10 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO BDI expert and diagnostics software Has been discussed extensively in two meetings between CO, BDI, EA, PO and OP, organised by H.Schmickler (01/03 and 17/05). This software will be based on 5 approaches, 3 of which involve CO: FESA navigator (simple get/set/sub)  BDI FESA expert programs (incl. sequences of commands)  BDI/SW No expert GUIs requested for PLC’s! Minor additions to CESAR GUIs  Cesar team Working sets & knobs(for PLC)  CO configuration of WS & knobs by BDI/EA Integration of Jython scripts into Cesar GUI  CO The VME equipment bus (and MAGEA?) will still use SL-equip and nodal in 2006, but will be moved to FESA navigator and expert GUIS a.s.a.p. (for 2007?)  Nodal is still required at least in 2006, CMW gateway to be stabilised !! The FESA PLC software will be provided by CO/FC by October Integration in common platform coordinated by BDI/EA with help from CO/AP Agreed on. (StdCtrls)

11. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 11 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  Access control application program  Reading of Radiation monitors  Settings management  Surveillance, alarms, fixed displays, teletext  Logging (surveillance, measurements, set-actions)  Printing of GUIs  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Lau’s Slide

12. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 12 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  new StdCtrls (CESAR, CO/AP, CO/IN )  Access control application program  adaptations (CESAR)  Reading of Radiation monitors  CESAR (StdCtrls, CO/AP)  Settings management CESAR (functionality as in old Nodal System), (additional requirements under discussion)  CESAR  Surveillance  CESAR (StdCtrls, CO/AP), alarms  LASER, fixed displays  CESAR, (StdCtrls, CO/AP), teletext old system (CO/IN)  Logging (surveillance, measurements  LHC logging (StdCtrls, CO/DM), set-actions CESAR )  Printing of GUIs  StdCtrls ( CO/IN) (OK for experimental physicists?)  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  CESAR  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential

13. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 13 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Applications for beam line operators,users:  Jython integration  Access control application program  Reading of Radiation monitors  Settings management  Surveillance, alarms, fixed displays, teletext  Logging (surveillance, measurements, actions)  Printing of GUIs  User documentation & Training for operators and EA+BDI experts  Long term maintenance and adaptation to new requirements (apart from configuration – done by ATB-EA) Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Very active participation of CO experts in commissioning, tests and dry runs is essential Long term maintenance responsibility CESAR Control System Core  maintained and extended by CO/AP Technology upgrades  mostly CO (some details to be discussed) GUIs  maintained and extended by OP/SPS, ATB/EA Configuration data (XML, Databases)  ATB/EA

14. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 14 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Other CO responsibilities:  Long term maintenance & support for all software under CO responsibility  Timing with 5 events, that should ‘always’ be present (also for dry runs), including VME hardware, software and support  Tools to populate & maintain configuration database (AB/CO/DM)  Transmission of beam line status to the users (“STDBLK, NSTDBLK”)  Provides and supports PC’s for CCC and areas  Console manager Lau’s Slide

15. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 15 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Other CO responsibilities:  Long term maintenance & support for all software under CO responsibility  Timing with 5 events, that should ‘always’ be present (also for dry runs), including VME hardware, software and support  discussed & agreed (CO/HT)  Tools to populate & maintain configuration database (AB/CO/DM)  Now implemented with MS Access, to be ported to standard technology  Transmission of beam line status to the users (“STDBLK, NSTDBLK”)  online monitoring + SDDS (StdCtrls, CO/AP), small additions to CESAR  Provides and supports PC’s for CCC and areas  StdCtrls, CO/IN  Console manager  StdCtrls, CO/AP

16. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 16 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO EAST Area: Needs for 2006 and beyond: All the needs we have for the North Area, apart from the upgrade related items. This includes:  Maintenance of existing software  Timing  PC configuration and maintenance in EBCR  Control consoles in CCC However, the CCC is far from the East Area, the lack of remote control becomes serious handicap. Instrumentation is very limited At the EA day a controls upgrade project will be presented for 2007 To be evaluated when the request comes.  CO priorities? Lau’s Slide

17. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 17 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CNGS Equipment Control: Equipment#Responsibility of CO TBID1Read, log & display, fit, orthogonal scans with magnets upstream the target ‘BLM’ (used as ion chambers) 2-4Read, log & display Horn/Reflector1/1On, Off, Reset, change current by max. 10%, change polarity, grounding; switch valve (water cooling); Read, log & display water cooling system parameters Helium Tube2Read, log & display of Oxymeter Shutter1Read, log & display position, move shutter for Access Decay Tube1Read, log & display pressure Muon Monitors 2 x ( 17-34 fixed +1 motorized ) 36-70 Read, log & display intensity in each monitor, display profiles; set or scan position of motorized monitor Temp. Probes 40-56 Read, log & display Timing + data interchangeGPS time stamp for every extraction, data interchange between CERN and Gran Sasso Alarms, Interlocks, ACCESS For reference Lau’s Slide

18. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 18 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO CNGS Equipment Control: Equipment#Responsibility of CO TBID1Read, log & display, fit, orthogonal scans with magnets upstream the target ‘BLM’ (used as ion chambers) 2-4Read, log & display Horn/Reflector1/1On, Off, Reset, change current by max. 10%, change polarity, grounding; switch valve (water cooling); Read, log & display water cooling system parameters Helium Tube2Read, log & display of Oxymeter Shutter1Read, log & display position, move shutter for Access Decay Tube1Read, log & display pressure Muon Monitors 2 x ( 17-34 fixed +1 motorized ) 36-70 Read, log & display intensity in each monitor, display profiles; set or scan position of motorized monitor Temp. Probes 40-56 Read, log & display Timing + data interchangeGPS time stamp for every extraction, data interchange between CERN and Gran Sasso Alarms, Interlocks, ACCESS For reference [Detailed analysis of requirements still ongoing] Standard Controls Requirements Read/Control  WorkingSets/Knobs (StdCtrls, CO/AP) Display  Fixed Displays (StdCtrls, CO/AP) Logging  Monitoring Service (StdCtrls, CO/AP), LHC Logging (StdCtrls, CO/DM) Profile display  Emittance/Profiles project (OP/SPS)? Scan  CESAR Alarms  LASER, Interlocks  SPS/LHC interlocks, Access  SPS/LHC access Horn/Reflector expert control with UNICOS Special Requirements Data exchange between CERN and Gran Sasso  LHC Logging? (To be analyzed)

19. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 19 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO Conclusions Requirements for SPS-EA clear and well managed –Good and solid collaboration –No worries for Control System Core –We need “our” CESAR GUI developers (from OP/SPS) in 1 st half 2006 for new equipment and missing functionality + CNGS work –Long-term maintenance clear, details to be defined East Area for 2007 not yet taken into account CNGS (secondary beamline) –Good and promising collaboration –Overall requirements understood (detailed analysis ongoing) –No problems anticipated, mostly standard controls If we get “our” GUI developers and if LEIR work stops end of 2005, we can handle Dry Runs, CNGS and SPS Operations in 2006.

20. AB/CO Review 19.09.2005 20 Vito Baggiolini AB/CO