1. DINO Communications Considerations 3 antenna ideas Timeline
Bent dipole
Monopole
Helix
Timeline

2. Considerations
We only have a certain diameter surface to work with which rules out certain antennas (parabolic, etc.)
We will not be able to encase an antenna in the internal structure of the satellite (horn, etc.)
Deployment of antennas
Budget

3. Bent Dipole Antenna Characteristics
1.22dB (for this bent dipole simulation), however gain can improve to approximately 7dB.
60 deg x 60 deg (typical half-power beam width, will vary with angle of dipole)
Frequency limits (3MHz to 500MHz)
Linear Polarization

4. Bent Dipole Antenna
Bent Dipole with increased angle from wave propagation axis (z)
Provided a gain of 4.9dB
As angle was increased from z axis, worked up to a gain of approximately 7dB. However a certain point the dB gain decreased as bent dipole looked more like a dipole

5. Monopole Antenna Characteristics
-18dB gain along z axis and 2.3dB gain along y axis (for this monopole antenna)
45 deg x 360 deg (typical half-power beam width)
No frequency limits
Linear polarization

6. Helix Antenna Characteristics 10dB (typical gain)
50 deg x 50 deg (typical half-power beam width)
100 MHz to 3GHz (frequency limit)
Circular polarization
If used, special attention will need to be made as to the angle and position of a helix antenna on the satellite.

7. Timeline
Rough link power budget by Will help find required gain for our satellite antennas.
With gains approximated for satellite antennas, work on design of antennas by 12-6.
Write up of full antenna plan containing link power budget and 1st prototype antennas. (?)