1. Using Moodle Assignment as a comprehensive, integrated solution @ USQ Fiona Myatt Michael Sankey Learning environments and Media

2. Enrolled students USQ All students28,100+ On-campus 7,600 External/online20,500 (73%) International 6,000 (1,100 ONC) The vast majority of USQ students access information services online Most Students and Staff know what they’re getting themselves in for when they come to USQ

3. The context – our VLE USQStudyDesk Student facing USQStaffDesk Staff training and playground USQOpenDesk OERs and Community based courses Repository Equella – LOR and other collections ePortfolio USQ Website and Portal

4. This time last year versus now Moodle EASE CMA/EMS Turnitin Moodle Turnitin 2 We are all on a journey

5. Integrated StudyDesk project New look-n-feel for Moodle Develop new communications/notifications bar Develop new tabular functionality Develop a fork of Moodle assignment (temp) Integrate assignment + with PeopleSoft Fully implement Equella under Moodle Semi-automate processes for migrations Further Moodle-Mahara integration

6. Standardised look and feel

8. Context

9. Staff eLE

12. Moodle Assignment The new features include: – Creating/linking activities to PeopleSoft – Marker quota management – Assignment quotas – Marker auto-allocation – Submission file type limiting – Enhanced verification of student submissions – Draft filtering, and flagging for attention – Administrative comments – Staff development resources

13. Create and link activities to PeopleSoft

16. Marker quota management

17. Assignment quotas

19. Assignment quotas Marker auto-allocation

20. Submission file type limiting

21. Enhanced verification of student submissions

22. Draft filtering

23. Flagging for attention

24. Administrative comments

25. Training

27. USQStaffDesk

28. Pedagogy

29. Issues we have faced A bigger change for staff than we anticipated Overwhelmed them with a 50 page document We got caned Conflated with Turnitin issues But, staff were not engaging in PD Had to offer more personalised training But, we have a plan to make further improvements Identified future development: – Moderation – More filtering options – extensions, late submissions, not yet released – Identification of downloaded assignments – Configure downloaded submissions into directories

30. Conclusions Hoping that some of these innovations may be deemed worthy for inclusion into core Most of the issues we faced were not due to bad functionality Different way of supporting staff and students Need to be conscious that most teachers are really busy