Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing"— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing
January 30, 2014

2

3 Definitions QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST (QPL): A listing of products from manufacturers who have received a PRI product qualification to a specific aerospace standard for specific product designations and plant locations. QUALIFIED PRODUCT GROUP (QPG): A committee mandated by the QPMC responsible for assessing whether manufacturer's products comply with the relevant aerospace standard. The committee is composed of members from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Government Agencies. QUALIFIED PRODUCT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (QPMC): The committee that manages the Qualified Product Process/Program. 2

4 PRI QPL Program Background
QPL - A document which lists qualified manufacturers who have met the product qualification test requirements to a specified industry standard for specific part numbers and plant locations 1998 1996 2014 Pilot program Industry Managed PRI QPL Program PRI championed pilot program, with organizational concept SAE committee volunteers Pilot program success PRI QPL program formally established Standard Development Organization (SDO) guidelines created and approved by SAE Aerospace Council TODAY. . . DoD Acquisition Reform Military specifications with QPL’s posed a problem for non-government standards to convert Preserve value-added aerospace specification requirements More than 30,000 products/parts 8 active Qualified Product Groups 3

5 Purpose of the Aerospace QPL Program
Maintain a list of manufacturer’s critical products where those products have been qualified as meeting specific industry standards. To manage the review process of submitted data and other materials reviewed by the QPG. 4

6 Motivation Users (OEMs/Government/Airlines)
Collaboration with other OEMs/Government/Airlines Reduce costs by reduced need for in-house/outside lab testing Uses consistent qualification procedures/standards Maximize competition without the loss of quality Avoid cost associated with maintaining User QPLs (testing, qualification, administration) Suppliers Typically lower costs than when qualifying products to User standards/specifications Utilize initial qualification data to a wider industry base Eliminate redundant testing and qualification processes Ensure fairness among suppliers Utilize consistent approach to qualification of product 5

7 Industry-Managed QPL Structure
Policy PRI Board of Directors Standards Developing Organization (SDO) Executive Leaders Legal Entity Set Policy Provide the Vision Qualified Product Management Council (QPMC) Senior Leaders & Managers Oversee Operation of QPL Program Establish & Implement Policy & Procedures QPG Coordination & Development Identify, Develop and Deploy Improvement Strategic/ Tactical QPGs Fluid Distribution Systems (G-3) Elastomer Seals (AMS CE) Sealants (G-9) Organic Coatings (G-8) Propulsion Lubricants (E-34) Propulsion Standards (E25) CACRC Advanced Composites (P-17) Technical Experts Determine Requirements Develop Documents Accepts Test Plan and Report Final Decision on QPL Listing Standard Technical Committees Technical Knowledgeable Parties With Interest Maintain Technical Standards, Recommended Practices, etc. Process responsibilities clearly defined 6

8 Administrator of the QPL program
Role of PRI Coordinate operations/procedures of the QPMC and QPGs Coordinate activities throughout the QPG review and report processing Maintain and Control QPLs Maintain customer records during and after review Maintain confidentiality Administrator of the QPL program 7

9 2014 Board of Directors Ron Meester Stan Adachi Anna “Graham” Morast
The Boeing Company Richard A. Amato GE Aviation Etienne Galen Snecma (Safran Group) Michael J. Hayward Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Mario Langlois (Chairman) Bombardier Aerospace Tony Maguire BAE Systems PLC Ron Meester Honeywell Aerospace Anna “Graham” Morast Pratt & Whitney, UTC Andy Page Rolls-Royce plc David L. Schutt SAE International Junji Tsuji Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Li Wei Aviation Industry Corporation of China Jianqiang Xu COMAC Relatively small group of executives from major OEMs and Primes who have ultimate responsibility for supplier quality. January 2014 8 5

10 Role of QPMC Provide direction for the administration of the PRI-QPL qualification program Provide an effective administrative structure to manage QPLs utilizing existing task groups, committee’s, etc. and provide feedback to industry in the form of guides or advisories Coordinate and communicate major QPL activities throughout the industry Ensure consistency in QPG operating procedures Resolve appeals of QPG decisions 9

11 Qualified Product Management Council
Manuel Koucouthakis Principal Engineer Honeywell Gary Landry Program Manager, Design Systems Pratt & Whitney Carl Levandusky General Engineer Naval Air Warfare Center James Lewis (Secretariat) Program Manager Performance Review Institute Paul Wittman Certification Manager Middle River Aircraft Systems Jerry Brown Materials & Processes Engineer Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. Kent DeFranco (Chairman) Materials Engineer, Sr. Staff Ross Downing (Vice Chairman) Principal Engineer The Boeing Company Alan Fletcher Materials Engineer, Systems Support Div. US Air Force Robert Hainline Mechanical & Structural Engineer Tim Koczanski Defense Standardization Program Office Membership to include expertise in the following disciplines: Engineering, Quality Assurance and Standardization Accurate as of January 2014 10

12 Policy and Procedures PROGRAM PD2000 DOCUMENT PROGRAM PD2001 DOCUMENT
GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF AN INDUSTRY MANAGED PRODUCT QUALIFICATION PROGRAM MANUFACTURER REQUEST FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND QUALIFICATION PROCESS 11

13 Role of Qualified Product Group
Meet and review data in a timely manner as required by procedure Establish procedures for the review Review data for conformance to requirements Define and approve data sources Disposition each qualification submittal Forward evaluation reports to PRI 12

14 Current Qualified Product Groups
Sealants * (SAE G-9) Polysulfide, Polythioether and Adhesion Promoters Commercial Aircraft Composite Repair (SAE CACRC) Composite Repair Materials, Processes and Methods Elastomer Seals * (SAE AMS-CE) O-Rings, Plate Seals, Gaskets and other Compression Seals Fluid Distribution Systems Components * (SAE G-3) Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing and Installation Procedures Organic Coatings (SAE G-8) Primers, Topcoats, Specialty Coatings e.g. Fuel Tank Coatings, Rain Erosion Coatings Propulsion Lubricants (SAE E-34) Synthetic Turbine Engine Lubricants General Standards for Aerospace and Propulsion Systems (SAE E-25) Solid Film Lubricant Polymeric Advanced Composite* (SAE P-17) * Require a Nadcap Audit Note the associated SAE Committees in parenthesis. 13

15 The QPL Process 14

16 QPL Approval Process – Initial
PRI Communicates Request for Additional Information To Supplier Yes Additional Information Requested Supplier Submits Application And Applicable Data to PRI PRI forwards Submission to QPG QPG Reviews Data No Approval Granted 15

17 As to the Supplier…. Obtain a copy of the applicable standard at Obtain a copy of the applicable Program Document at / Resources / Documents / Public Documents / QPL Programs Pay special attention to requirements, such as: AS/EN/JISQ9100 ISO/IEC Lab QPG witness Test plan requirements per the specification/PD document 16

18 And then…. Go to www.eAuditNet.com to initiate a “Project”.
Instructional PowerPoint Document Resources / Documents / Public Documents / QPL Programs / “QPL User Guide – Supplier” Documents to be marked as Proprietary. 17

19 The Nadcap Audit Process
18

20 Nadcap Nadcap – The leading worldwide cooperative program of major companies designed to manage a cost effective consensus approach to special processes and products and provide continuous improvement within the aerospace and automotive industries. 19

21 Require a Nadcap Audit Is a Nadcap Audit required?
SAE Committee determines if the Nadcap Audit is required The Nadcap Audit requirement is documented in the specification. 20

22 Information to Request
the Establishment of a PRI QPG 21

23 Primes Involved in the QPG
Determine the structure and relationship between SAE Committee and the yet to be established QPG [Minimum of 3 primes required] 22

24 Key Players SAE Committee Members Planning to Participate in the QPL Project Reviews Contact & Company Name 23

25 Program Information Number of Suppliers Impacted
Applicable Current Specification Numbers and List of Potential Specifications Potential QPL Projects (workload) Timeline for Completion/Publication of the Specification 24

26 Program Information (continued)
Is an AS/EN/JISQ9100 approved quality system required? Is it required to conduct the testing at an ISO/IEC accredited laboratory with applicable scope? 25

27 Program Information (continued)
What information is required on the on-line QPL listing? Is a Nadcap Audit required for the qualification? What are the requalification/recertification/ periodic testing/sampling requirements? Will grandfathering of materials be applicable? Per PD2001 Rev B – For a Grandfathered qualification in which the product is adopted from an existing OEM, government or military QPL, the manufacturer must submit official correspondence or approval letters relating to the qualification, a copy of the existing QPL and the associated qualification test reports and product drawings, if available. The QPG may request additional information as required, including the OEM verification of qualification if the QPL document is proprietary to the OEM. 26

28 Request for Development of a QPG
Formal Letter to the QPMC Formal Presentation at the QPMC Spring or Fall Meeting Time for approval Time for implementation Previously QPMC approval was obtained immediately after the presentation was made. However, we are not sure of the time required for approval based on the preferences of a new QPMC Chairman. Regarding implementation, that is also difficult to calculate. Implementation is based on everything coming together. i.e., Specification, Nadcap Audit, does it meet grandfathering criteria, development of QPG members, etc. On the PRI Administrative side of it, there are no time constraints, 2 to 3 months. 27

29 -On-line QPL -Program Documents 28

30 eAuditNet.com Register in eAuditNet
eAuditNet Support 29

31 On-Line QPL Under “Resources” select, “Online QPL”. 30

32 Select a Specific Manufacturer or SAE Standard
Select Specific QPG On-Line PRI-QPL OR Select a Specific Manufacturer or SAE Standard Click “Search” 31

33 Download to an Excel Spreadsheet
Download Search Data Download to an Excel Spreadsheet 32

34 QPL Documents in eAuditNet
Click as follows: Resources Documents Public Documents QPL Programs 33

35 PRI eAuditNet Website Link
Link PRI On-Line QPL Search to SAE Standards Website Button would indicate “click here to purchase the SAE specification” Link to SAE to Purchase the Standard 34

36 SAE Website Link Link SAE Standards website to PRI QPL
Button would indicate “PRI-QPL” Link to eAuditNet 35

37 CACRC QPL Search Results
36

38 Questions???? 37


Download ppt "Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google