1. Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010

2. AYP Requirements Meet annual targets for performance in Reading and Mathematics 2010 Reading Target Grades 3-8 83.7% of subgroups must be at “Meets Standard” or Higher Grades 9-12 and School Districts 81.3% of subgroups must be at “Meets Standard” or Higher 2010 Mathematics Target Grades 3-8 82.3% of subgroups must be at “Meets Standard” or Higher Grades 9-12 and School Districts 76.4% of subgroups must be at “Meets Standard” or Higher

3. Other Measures Test Participation Rate must be 95% of all identifiable subgroups (30 students or more) Attendance Rate must be 90% or greater Graduation Rate (senior high schools) must be 80% or greater (starting 2010)

4. Schools Meeting AYP Criteria for 2010 Elementary Schools: Broken Arrow, Deerfield, Hillcrest, Langston Hughes, New York, Prairie Park, Quail Run, Sunflower, Sunset Hill, Wakarusa Valley, Woodlawn Secondary Schools: Southwest Junior High, West Junior High, Free State High School

5. Good News 17 of our 22 schools maintained or improved the percentage of students scoring at “Meets” or above in both reading and mathematics 11 Elementary Schools have more than 90% of the students scoring at “Meets” or higher 7 Elementary Schools have more than 90% of the students scoring at “Meets” or higher

6. And more! More than 95% of Southwest Junior High students scored at “Meets” or higher in both reading and mathematics Central and West Junior Highs made significant gains in both reading and mathematics Over the past two years, Free State High School made significant gains in both reading and mathematics The district made significant gains in reading in 7 of 10 reported subgroups The district made significant gains in mathematics in 8 reported subgroups

7. Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence US Department of Education named Broken Arrow Elementary as a Blue Ribbon School of Excellence in 2009-10 The Kansas Department of Education has nominated Woodlawn Elementary for the Blue Ribbon School of Excellence award

8. Challenges Eight Lawrence schools did not make AYP in 2010 with at least one subgroup Cordley: Reading and Mathematics (Free/Reduced Lunch Students) Kennedy: Reading (All Students, Free/Reduced Lunch Students, Students with Disabilities, White Students) Pinckney: Reading (Students with Disabilities) Schwegler: Reading (Free/Reduced Lunch Students) and Mathematics (All Students, Free/Reduced Lunch Students)

9. - Central Junior High: Reading and Mathematics (Students with Disabilities) - South Junior High: Reading (Students with Disabilities, African-American Students) and Mathematics (All Students, Free/Reduced Lunch Students, Students with Disabilities, African-American Students) - Lawrence High School: Reading (All Students, Free/Reduced Lunch Students, Students with Disabilities, African-American Students) and Mathematics (African-American Students) - Lawrence Virtual School: Reading (Free/Reduced Lunch Students) and Mathematics (All Students, Free/Reduced Lunch Students, Students with Disabilities)

10. District AYP The district did not reach 2010 AYP Targets in the following areas/subgroups: Reading Free/Reduced Lunch Students; Students with Disabilities; African-American Students Mathematics Students with Disabilities; African-American Students In 2010 – 11, the District will be designated as “On Improvement” for Title I 10% of District Title I funding allocation must be withheld for professional development A comprehensive improvement plan will be required by Kansas State Department of Education

11. Continuous Improvement Completed a district-wide review of K-5 mathematics curriculum, instruction and assessment, resulting in the purchase of new instructional materials and the implementation of a comprehensive professional development plan to improve mathematics instruction. Implementation of systematic classroom-level assessments in K-7 mathematics. District-wide review of 6-12 mathematics curriculum, instruction and assessment. Training of teaching staff to incorporate a new district instructional framework and effective instructional strategies in daily classroom practices. Continuation of a reduced instructional coaching model, using master teachers to provide in-the-classroom professional development, instructional support and consultation. (During last year’s budget cuts, 10 of 15 district coaching positions were eliminated.)

12. Continuous Improvement Continuation of professional development for administrators, board members and teacher leaders regarding the achievement gaps among various student subgroups. Development of district and school-level equity leadership plans designed to address specific issues related to racial equity in achievement. Collaboration with institutions of higher education to identify and implement effective practices to address some of the specific gaps in reading and mathematics for students with disabilities. Continue to improve collaboration among general education, special education and English as a Second Language staff to meet the needs of students with specific learning differences. Reorganization of responsibilities assigned to district-level specialists in curriculum and instruction to provide better aligned support from pre-kindergarten through high school.

13. Continuous Improvement Continued implementation of a “Pyramid of Interventions,” including research-based programs/services at each school with greater focus on monitoring student performance as a result of targeted interventions. Continuation of elementary, junior and senior high intervention programs for students struggling with reading/math. Expand programs that have proven effective at one school to other schools. Continuation of elementary, junior and senior high school after-school tutoring programs at targeted schools. Continuation of a senior high credit recovery program. Review and revise our transition planning and communication practices to ensure the continuation of academic interventions for students moving from early childhood to kindergarten, elementary to middle school, and middle school to senior high school.

14. Continuous Improvement Use of some Wednesday early-release time to plan for the 2011-12 implementation of effective, research-based practices in 6-8 middle schools Use of some Wednesday late-start time to plan for the 2011-12 implementation of effective four-year high schools. Ongoing communications with parents and community members about “Re-designing for student success:” 6-8 middle schools and four- year high schools”. Continued use of Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) testing, Kansas Computerized Assessment (KCA) and locally-developed formative assessments to monitor student learning and guide teacher planning for classroom instruction. Consideration of the purchase of a data warehousing software system to allow administrators and teachers to more effectively manage, analyze and utilize the volume of student learning and achievement data. Use of the Skyward Family Access system to communicate with parents about student progress.