1. The U.S. Census Bureau’s Postcensal and Intercensal Population Estimates Alexa Jones-Puthoff Population Division National Conference on Health Statistics August 7, 2012 1

2. Overview Postcensal Population Estimates Postcensal vs. Intercensal Estimates Intercensal Estimates Methods Race in the Population Estimates 2

3. 3 Postcensal Estimates, Produced Annually Population –Nation by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –Counties by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –Cities and towns (incorporated places and minor civil divisions / a.k.a. subcounty areas), total population only –Puerto Rico Commonwealth and municipios by age and sex Housing units –States –Counties 3

4. 4 Uses of Population Estimates Distribution of federal funds Population controls for major surveys –American Community Survey –Current Population Survey –Survey of Income and Program Participation –American Housing Survey Denominators for statistical rates Program planning 4

5. 5 Postcensal Population Estimates Methods Estimates base is most recent Census From the last Census forward, population is estimated using a cohort-component method (also called the administrative record method) at the national, state, and county levels –Nation: Population 2 = Population 1 + Births - Deaths + NIM NIM = Net international migration –States and counties: Population 2 = Population 1 + Births - Deaths + NIM + DM DM = Domestic Migration 5

6. 6 Base population –The most recent census Births and deaths –National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) –Federal-State Cooperative for Population Estimates (FSCPE) Net international migration –American Community Survey (ACS) –Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS) –Census Bureau estimates of foreign-born emigration and native migration –Defense Manpower Data Center Domestic migration –Federal tax data –Medicare National, State, and County Data Sources 6

7. Historical Comparison, National Total Population Estimates and Census Counts: 1980 - 2010 Year Postcensal Population Estimate Census Count Percent Difference 1980221,672226,546-2.15 1990250,172248,7100.59 2000274,520281,422-2.45 2010308,450308,746-0.10 Note: Percent difference = (Estimate – Census)/Census*100. Numbers are shown in thousands. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Population Estimates Program. 7

8. 8 Postcensal versus Intercensal Estimates Postcensal estimates –Every year –July 1 estimates, full series from last Census date forward (for 2009, series was April 1, 2000-July 1, 2009) –“Vintage” identified by terminal year in the series For example, series of estimates released beginning in December 2009 were the “Vintage 2009” estimates Intercensal estimates –Once a decade –July 1 estimates, full series between two most recent Census dates –Most recent intercensals begin with Census 2000 and end with Census 2010 8

9. Intercensal Method for April 1, 2000 to April 1, 2010: County and Above Interpolation methodology Postcensal estimates served as the base Difference between the 2010 Census and the postcensal estimates– or “error of closure”– was calculated by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin That difference was then smoothed back over the time period Methodological exceptions for small cells, but with controls to higher-level totals Patterns in postcensal estimates are preserved even when the level changes 9

11. 2000 Census *

13. 13 † without challenges or Special Censuses

14. 14 † without challenges or Special Censuses

15. 15 † without challenges or Special Censuses

16. 16 Intercensal Estimates and Vintage 2010 Postcensal Estimates † for the Total Resident Population: District of Columbia † without challenges or Special Censuses

17. Intercensal Method for April 1, 2000 to April 1, 2010: Cities and Towns (Subcounty) Totals only; no demographic detail Intercensal estimates were calculated separately for the household and group quarters populations, then summed to create resident population At primitive geographic level (lowest level of mutually exclusive geographies): –Straight line interpolation between Census 2000 and Census 2010 –Controlled to county intercensal totals 17

18. “Intercensal Series” Estimates Method for April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2010 Many users needed an early (pre-Vintage- 2011) July 1, 2010 estimate consistent with the 2010 Census July 1, 2010 was estimated for the household population and the group quarters population (which, when summed, give the resident population) and housing units Numeric and percent change between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2010 in the Vintage 2010 estimates were used to move the estimates forward from April 1, 2010 (Census)

19. Race in the Population Estimates

20. Modification of Race Responses Race groups differ across products/needs –Census (2000, 2010) data include “Some Other Race” as a valid race response –Population estimates data include five races “alone” and “in combination” with other races, but no “Some Other Race” –Bridged race estimates include only four single- race groups (no “Some Other Race” and no possibility of combinations) Stepwise process to accommodate these three different constructs 20

21. Census Race to Population Estimates Race Groups Responses of one or more of the five specified OMB races (White, Black, AIAN, Asian, NHPI) are not modified Responses that include Some Other Race (SOR) are modified as follows: –If SOR and one or more OMB races, SOR is dropped –If SOR alone, race is allocated either from within the household or from a hot deck, in both cases matched on specific Hispanic origin response In 2010, 97% of SOR alone population was Hispanic; modification does not affect Hispanic origin 21 Note: AIAN = American Indian and Alaska Native; NHPI = Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.

22. Population Estimates Race Groups to Bridged Race Groups Responses of one or more of the four “bridged race” categories (White, Black, AIEA, API) are not modified Responses that include two or more races are modified to become single-race responses Modification done on the basis of specifications from NCHS 22 Note: AIEA = American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut; API = Asian and Pacific Islander.

23. Race Modification Results Race Census 2010Modified RaceBridged Race NumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent One Race 299,736,46597.1301,761,34397.7308,745,538100.0 White 223,553,26572.4241,937,06178.4245,423,23079.5 Black 38,929,31912.640,250,63513.042,065,39513.6 AIAN 2,932,2480.93,739,5061.24,263,5391.4 Asian 14,674,2524.815,159,5164.9 16,993,3745.5 NHPI 540,0130.2674,6250.2 Some Other Race 19,107,3686.2(X) Two or More Races 9,009,0732.96,984,1952.3(X) 23 (X) Not applicable Note: AIAN = American Indian and Alaska Native (American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut in bridged race); NHPI = Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. Asian and NHPI combine to form Asian and Pacific Islander (API) in bridged race. Sources: Census 2010 data available via http://factfinder2.census.gov/. Modified Race data are from the intercensal estimates produced by the Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, available via http://www.census.gov/popest/intercensal/. Bridged race data are from a special tabulation.http://factfinder2.census.gov/http://www.census.gov/popest/intercensal/

24. Products of Interest Intercensal Estimates http://www.census.gov/popest/data/intercensal/index.html Postcensal Estimates (Vintage 2011) http://www.census.gov/popest/data/index.html Modified Race File http://www.census.gov/popest/research/modified.html Estimates Evaluation http://www.census.gov/popest/research/eval-estimates/eval-est.html

25. Contact Information Alexa Jones-Puthoff Chief, Population Estimates Branch 301-763-2385 (branch) 301-763-6030 (direct) alexa.kennedy.jones-puthoff@census.gov www.census.gov/popest 25