Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Yellowhead Area Transmission System Development

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Yellowhead Area Transmission System Development"— Presentation transcript:

1 Yellowhead Area Transmission System Development
Ata Rehman, P.Eng Manager, South/North System Planning February / March 2009

2 Transmission system planning process
Outline Overview of the AESO Transmission system planning process Transmission Development in the Yellowhead area Overview of existing system Need for development Development Alternatives Comparison and Preliminary Recommendation Next steps

3 AESO: Our role and context
Plan the Transmission System Arrange Access for Load and Generation Operate the Wholesale Electric Market Direct the Day to Day Operation of the Transmission System At the AESO, our job is to ensure all Albertans receive safe, economic and reliable power, today and in the future. As a foundation, let’s look at the 4 slabs on the bottom of this picture We exist under the Electric Utilities Act, created with a public interest mandate We don’t own or operate any power facilities nor do we have a financial interest in the industry We take a collaborative and consultative approach to planning And the transmission projects put forward by the AESO are currently regulated by the EUB This leads to the 4 blocks on the top We manage the coordinated operation of the power grid and make sure the supply of power is in constant balance with the demand across the province We plan the provincial transmission system, including interties with neighboring systems We strive to ensure this infrastructure keeps pace with the growing demand for power and arrange access to the grid for load and generation We operate Alberta’s wholesale electricity market with over 200 participants and over $7 billion in annual energy transactions, ensuring a fair, efficient and openly competitive wholesale market for all participants Created by Legislation: Public Interest Mandate Independent: No Commercial Interests Collaborative and Consultative Approach Transmission Regulated by AUC

4 The Flow of Power AESO Role and Responsibilities (more detail to come in presentation) GFO Role and Responsibilities (high-level overview) TFO Role and Responsibilities (more detail to come in our and AML presentation) DFO Role and Responsibilities (high-level overview of role and responsibility)

5 Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO)
Roles of AESO & TFO Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) - Preparation and submission of Needs Identification Document to Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) Transmission Facility Owner (TFO) - Responsible for design, route selection and building the facilities

6 Transmission Planning Process: Role of AESO
- Reviews Load/Generator interconnection request - Determines the need for transmission development - Develops alternatives - Conducts necessary studies - Undertakes Participant Involvement Program (stakeholder engagement)

7 Transmission Planning Process: Role of AESO (cont.)
Planning Considerations Social Technical Economic

8 Transmission 2- Stage Process
Transmission Facility Owner (TFO) - Detailed routing and specific siting - Detailed engineering - Stakeholder engagement process (can be separate from AESO process or combined) - Submits a Facilities Application to the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) for approval

9 Need for System Reinforcement
The project area covers the following AESO planning Areas: - Wabamun - Drayton Valley; and - Edson/Hinton Need is driven by the following factors: - Transmission Facilities reaching the end of their service life Half century old (49-54 years) - The system is not adequate to serve projected demand Load is projected to grow from 564 MW to 633 MW in 10 years Loading and voltage issues

10 Project Area Location

11 Existing Transmission System Map

12 Existing System Simplified Electrical Diagram

13 Wabamun Area – 104L Upgrade
104L is a 67 km 69 kV line from Onoway substation to Barrhead Substation Supplies Onoway, Glenevis, and Lac La Nonne substations Issues: Line has reached the end of its service life. Constructed in 1955 (54 years old) Line and substations are not adequate to serve growing load Poor voltage performance Below average reliability

14 Wabamun Area – 104L Upgrade
Alternatives: Alternative 1 - Rebuild 104L and upgrade substations Rebuilding 67 km of 104L Upgrading 138/69 kV capacity at Barrhead 69S Addition of capacitor banks at Onoway Alternative 2 - Build a new 240 kV supply substation (Cherhill) New 240/25 kV substation somewhere north of the Alberta Beach area Lac La Nonne and Glenevis substations will be supplied through the distribution system Decommission 104L and associated substations

15 Wabamun Area – 104L Upgrade
Comparison of Alternatives Alternative 2 appears more favourable More robust Addresses supply substation capacity issues (Onoway, Lac La Nonne) Lower cost Lower land impact

16 Drayton Valley Area – 129L/537L/544L Upgrade and reconfiguration
129L, 537L and 544L are 69 kV lines between Entwistle and Lodgepole substations System supplies Drayton Valley, Easyford, Pembina Pipelines and Entwistle substations Issues: Lines and associated substation facilities are reaching the end of their service life (49 to 54 years old) Line and substations are not adequate to serve growing load Below average reliability Lack of adequate voltage support

17 Drayton Valley Area – 129L/537L/544L Upgrade and reconfiguration
Alternatives: Alternative 1 - Rebuild lines and upgrade substations (like-for-like) Rebuilding a total of up to 93 km of 69 kV line Upgrade a number of substation facilities Addition of three capacitor banks Alternative 2 – Upgrade 129L to 138 kV and reconfigure system Rebuilding 129L to 138 kV standards (47 km) Easyford and Pembina Pipeline substations will be supplied through the distribution system Decommission 537L, 544L and associated substations

18 Drayton Valley Area – 129L/537L/544L Upgrade and reconfiguration
Comparison of Alternatives Alternative 2 appears more favourable Higher capacity for long term growth Improved system performance Lower cost Lower land impact

19 Hinton/Edson Area – 138 kV Capacity Upgrade
Issues: 745L does not have adequate capacity to serve area load during outages Area lacks adequate voltage support 745L is 54 years old and approaching end of service life Uses a sub-standard, low capacity conductor (3/0)

20 Hinton/Edson Area – 138 kV Capacity Upgrade
Alternatives: Alternative 1 - Rebuild and reconfigure 745L Rebuild 745L (80 km) with higher capacity conductors (477 kcmil) Construct 8 km new double circuit 138 kV line from Bikerdike substation into 745L Add one capacitor bank at Cold Creek Substation Alternative 2 – Build a new 138 kV line and decommission 745L Build a new single circuit 138 kV line from 740L near Gulf Robb tap to Cold Creek Substation (45 km) Build a new switching station near the Gulf Robb tap Construct 8 km new single circuit 138 kV line between Bikerdike to Edson substations Upgrade 745L from Cold Creek to Dalehurst tap and decommission the rest

21 Hinton/Edson Area – 138 kV Capacity Upgrade
Comparison of Alternatives Alternative 1 appears more favourable: Better access for maintenance and quick restoration Lower cost No new right of way Less land impact

22 Summary of Potential Developments & Cost Estimates

23 Potential Developments – Simplified Electrical Diagram

24 Stakeholder Engagement Process
AESO meeting with and/or sending information to: - 47,018 residents and occupants by postal code - Municipalities in the study area - Provincial representatives - First Nations and Métis Settlements Letter with background information requesting feedback delivered to residences in the area via a postal code mail out Newspaper advertisements requesting feedback in: - Stony Plain Reporter - Spruce Grove Examiner - Barrhead Leader - Onoway Community Voice - Wabamun Community Voice - Edson Leader - Hinton Parklander - Drayton Valley Western Review Project information on AESO website requesting feedback

25 Transmission Facility Owner (TFO)
Next Steps AESO - Prepares Needs Identification Document (NID) - AESO to file NID with the Alberta Utilities Commission (AUC) for approval (early Q2/2009) Transmission Facility Owner (TFO) - ATCO directed by the AESO to develop a Facilities Application for detailed engineering, siting, and routing for facilities - Facilities Application to be developed with further stakeholder engagement and submitted to the AUC for approval

26 Contact us General AESO Enquiries
- On our web site, - Via to Yellowhead Area Transmission Development enquiries: - Via telephone at - At our web site,


Download ppt "Yellowhead Area Transmission System Development"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google