Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 1 PEP-II IR2 alignment S.Ecklund, C.LeCocq, R.Pushor, R.Ruland, A.Seryi, Z.Wolf With big help from A.Acosta, F.Brown,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 1 PEP-II IR2 alignment S.Ecklund, C.LeCocq, R.Pushor, R.Ruland, A.Seryi, Z.Wolf With big help from A.Acosta, F.Brown,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 1 PEP-II IR2 alignment S.Ecklund, C.LeCocq, R.Pushor, R.Ruland, A.Seryi, Z.Wolf With big help from A.Acosta, F.Brown, R.Chestnut, A.Chupyra 1, B.Dix, C.Dudley, T.Himel, D.Jensen, M.Kondaurov 1, T.Lahey, B.Myers, M.Petree, J.Seeman, U.Wienands, M.Zurawel, et al. ( 1 BINP) PEP-II MAC meeting, October 2003

2 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 2 Event flow Motivations –IR orbit correctors show correlation with current – IR magnets move? –Spring 2003 => tiltmeters installed on IR quads observe motion correlated with current SR heating vacuum chamber => expansion => push magnets August 2003 : decided to install new systems in IR –Hydrostatic level system –Stretched wire system –Laser tracker system This talk: –Data from 3 systems => reconstruction of IR magnet motion Next: –Orbit motion modeling, optimization of orbit correction or feedforward. Possibly, cure the cause of motion Consider only vertical motion. Horizontal data, and data from laser tracker are being analyzed and are not discussed in this talk.

3 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 3 Hydrostatic sensors Stretched wire. Sensors. Tiltmeters Left A Backward <= e+

4 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 4 Hydrostatic sensors Tiltmeters Laser tracker Right B Forward <= e+

5 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 5 Left side. Stretched wire system. Hydro sensors Q5Q4

6 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 6 Right side. Hydro sensors on the raft. TargetsLaser tracker Tiltmeters Q5 Q4

7 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 7 IR magnet motion – “hydro” data The left raft motion is correlated with current(s), but not much the right raft. Slope is changing more significantly than the center of Q5 position. IR Motion expressed as a vertical slope (pitch) and position of the raft Slope: positive slope = end of raft closer to IP lifts up. Raft position is recalculated to the center of Q5 quad (positive position means the raft is higher). Horizontal axis => day of 2003.

8 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 8 Left side moves significantly more than the right one, the motion is correlated with current (mostly LER), is observed by hydro, wire and tiltmeter systems, and correlates with IR orbit feedback signals

9 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 9 Left side motion is caused primarily by LER– whose SR shines onto the left side Left Right Raw data Correlation with LER current easier to see in the moments of different behavior of LER and HER currents Left Right

10 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 10 Reconstruction of IR motion Left side moves most Were lucky to install wire on the left side! Hydro system on the raft, wire and titmeters on magnets allow to reconstruct motion of magnets –Is there only common pitch of the raft and no magnet motion relative to the raft? Considered and rejected as unsupported by data –Is there transverse flexibility between Q2 and Q1 that would affect wire data? Considered and rejected. Q2-Q1 is rigid transversely Shown below is a preliminary but consistent model of IR magnet motion

11 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 11 Left raft IR magnet motion model Example of magnet position for two extremes. The raft pitch change by about 30  rad, the magnet position change by about 120  m. Model: on top of hydro data (motion of raft as a whole) add relative motion to be consistent with wire and tiltmeters. Most of deformation occur near Q2.

12 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 12 Left raft motion model details of the fit to wire data Model: use common pitch of the left raft, + relative on raft motion, dependent on the common pitch, to predict and make best fit to the stretched wire data. Measured wire dataModeled wire data

13 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 13 Left raft motion model details of the fit to tiltmeter data Model: use common pitch of the left raft, + relative on raft motion, dependent on the common pitch, to predict and make best fit to the tiltmeters data. Measured tiltmeter dataModeled tiltmeter data

14 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 14 Left IR magnet motion model AVI GIF

15 Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 15 Summary and next steps Installation of new alignment monitoring systems in IR-2 allowed to determine details of IR magnet motion Most of the fast (current-correlated) motion is on the left raft, due to LER SR, supposedly heating chamber near Q2 Next step is orbit modeling and optimization of orbit correction and location of correctors. Possibly, with use of feedforward from alignment systems. Can this motion be cured? –Re-steer orbit? (but there are many restrictions on orbit position…) –Mechanical design modification? –…


Download ppt "Andrei Seryi, 10/10/03, PEP-II MAC mtg. 1 PEP-II IR2 alignment S.Ecklund, C.LeCocq, R.Pushor, R.Ruland, A.Seryi, Z.Wolf With big help from A.Acosta, F.Brown,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google