Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory."— Presentation transcript:

1 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0229 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD. 2011.12.0229JSP Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users Sandra I. Oba, MS; John J. Gavin III, BA; Qian-Jie Fu, PhD

2 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0229 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD. 2011.12.0229JSP Aim – Use nonauditory training task to engage attention and improve memory of cochlear implant subjects. Relevance – Auditory training significantly improves cochlear implant users’ speech and music perception. – However, it is unclear whether performance gains are due to improved auditory perception or to generally improved attention, memory, and/or cognitive processing.

3 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0229 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD. 2011.12.0229JSP Method Assessed speech and music perception and auditory and visual memory in 10 cochlear implant users before, during, and after training with nonauditory visual digit span (VDS) task.

4 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0229 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD. 2011.12.0229JSP Results VDS performance: – Significantly improved after VDS training. Auditory outcome measures: – Most did not significantly improve. – However, small (but significant) improvements in vocal emotion recognition and melodic contour identification. Posttraining gains much smaller with nonauditory VDS training than in previous auditory training studies with cochlear implant users.

5 This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory performance of adult cochlear implant users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(1):99–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.12.0229 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/JRRD. 2011.12.0229JSP Conclusion Results suggest that: – Posttraining gains in previous studies were not solely attributable to improved attention or memory. More likely due to improved auditory perception. – Cochlear implant users may require targeted auditory training to improve speech and music perception.


Download ppt "This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Oba SI, Galvin JJ 3rd, Fu QJ. Minimal effects of visual memory training on auditory."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google