Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming."— Presentation transcript:

1 Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming

2 Conclusions  Ultimately CCS is viable only if legislation (international and national) produces a carbon-constrained world.  Legal/Regulatory framework under construction.  CCS industry will be on scale of oil and gas industry (largest in human history).  Expense is uncertain until large scale project completed, but on order of $1 trillion/year to build CCS industry.  Possible with current science and technologies.  Future technological advances will reduce cost, improve efficiency and enhance safety.  More scientific work needs to be done.  There is technical knowledge and experience within petroleum industry.

3 Carbon (Dioxide) Emissions and Climate Change  Increase in atmosphere is “linked” to climate changes.  There is still no proof of the link.

4 Carbon Capture and Sequestration  First step is capture of carbon applied to large point sources that currently emit 10,500MtCO 2 /year (e.g. power stations).  CO 2 would be compressed and transported for storage and use.

5 Large Stationary CO 2 Sources carbon dioxide sources >0.1 MtCO 2 /yr most (75 %) CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion/processing (coal-fired power plants are almost 3 wedges)

6 Four basic systems  Post combustion  Pre combustion  Oxyfuel  Industrial All gas is mostly CO 2 plus N 2, CO, SO 2, etc. All Methods capture 80-95% of CO 2 Carbon Dioxide Capture

7 Four basic systems  Pre combustion  Post combustion  Oxyfuel  Industrial Separation stage CO2

8 Sequestration Targets  Terrestrial  Release into the atmosphere for incorporation into biomass (short term - 10-100’s years)  Oceanic  Release into ocean for dissolution and dispersion (medium term – 100-1000’s years)  Geologic  Injection into subsurface (long term – 10,000-1,000,000’s years)

9 Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic

10 Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal into deep ocean locations Much of the ocean is deep enough for CO 2 to remain liquid phase (average ocean depth is 12,460 feet) Largest potential storage capacity (2,000 - 12,000GtCO 2 – worldwide) Storage time 100’s – 1000’s years Potential ecological damage (pH change) Models and small scale projects only Characteristics

11 Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal costs are fairly well known Distance and volume are primary considerations (inverse relationship)

12 Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic

13 Sequestration Targets  Atmospheric  Oceanic  Geologic Disposal into subsurface locations Deep enough to remain supercritical (greater than 2500 feet depth) Large potential storage capacity (200 - 2,000GtCO 2 worldwide) Storage time 10,000’s – 1,000,000’s years Potential ecological damage (point source leaks) 40+ years experience in petroleum EOR operations and sour gas disposal Characteristics

14 Carbon Dioxide Phase Behavior  Supercritical Fluid is a liquid-like gas  Gas-like viscosity, fluid-like compressibility and solvent behavior  CO 2 above critical T and P (31°C and 73.8 bar or 1085 psi)  Density about 50% of water  Combustion product from fossil fuel  GHG  Four phases of interest

15 Carbon Storage Geological Sequestration  want to inject to greater than 800 m depth  CO 2 in supercritical state  behaves like a fluid with properties that are mixture of liquid and gas  also stores more in given volume  price to pay in compressing gas

16  Terrestrial, Oceanic and Geologic P and T conditions.  Ocean conditions allow disposal of liquid CO 2  Geologic conditions allow disposal of supercritical CO 2 Carbon Dioxide Phase Behavior and Sequestration

17  need geologic site that will hold CO 2 safely for 1000s of years – natural analogs  four possible geologic targets  enhanced oil and gas recovery  depleted oil and gas fields  saline aquifers  enhanced CBM recovery Geological Carbon Sequestration

18 Geological Carbon Sequestration Leakage Paths

19 CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization  Cost data from IGPCC 2005  Includes cost of compression to pipeline pressure (1500 psi) Separation stage CO2 45% difference

20 CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport  Price highly dependent on volume per year.  Includes construction, O&M, design, insurance, right of ways.  for capacities of >5 MtCO2 yr-1 the cost is between 2 and 4 2002US$/tCO2 per 250km for an onshore pipe Separation stage CO2 37% difference

21 CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport + Storage (Oceanic and Geologic)  Oceanic - For transport (ship) distance of 100- 500km and injection depths of 3000m  Geologic - For storage in onshore, shallow, highly permeable reservoir with pre- existing infrastructure Separation stage CO2 31% difference 23% difference

22 CCS relative cost Capture + Pressurization + Transport + Storage (Oceanic and Geologic) – EOR Offset  Assuming oil price of $50 bbl.  Without Sequestration Credit (Carbon Tax) Separation stage CO2

23 Pilot Projects  Sleipner, Norway (North Sea)  Weyburn Project, Saskatchewan (Canada)

24 Pilot Projects: Sleipner  Sleipner is a North Sea gas field  operated by Statoil, Norway’s largest oil company  produces natural gas for European market  in North Sea, hydrocarbons are produced from platforms

25 Pilot Projects: Sleipner  special platform, Sleipner T, built to separate CO 2 from natural gas  supports 20 m (65 ft) tall, 8,000 ton treatment plant  plant produces 1 million tons of CO 2  also handles gas piped from Sleipner West  Norway has a carbon tax of about $50/ton for any CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere  to avoid the tax, Statoil has re-injected CO 2 underground since production began in 1996

26  production is from Heimdal Formation  2,500 m (8,200 ft) below sea level  produces natural gas - mixture of hydrocarbons (methane (CH 4 ), ethane (C 2 H 6 ), butane (C 4 H 10 )), gases (N 2, O 2, CO 2, sulfur compounds, water)  the natural gas at Sleipner has 9 % CO 2 Pilot Projects: Sleipner

27  CO 2 injected into Utsira Formation  high porosity & permeability sandstone layer  250 m thick and 800 m (2,600 ft) below sea bed  filled with saline water, not oil or gas  CO 2 storage capacity estimated at 600 billion tons (20 years of world CO 2 emissions)  millions tons CO 2 stored since 1996  first commercial storage of CO 2 in deep, saline aquifer Pilot Projects: Sleipner

28  seismic surveys conducted to determine location of CO 2  results shown in diagram to left  Optimum conditions for geophysical imaging Pilot Projects: Sleipner

29 Conclusions  Ultimately CCS is viable only if legislation (international and national) produces a carbon-constrained world.  Legal/Regulatory framework under construction.  CCS industry will be on scale of oil and gas industry (largest in human history).  Expense is uncertain until large scale project completed, but on order of $1 trillion/year to build CCS industry.  Possible with current science and technologies.  Future technological advances will reduce cost, improve efficiency and enhance safety.  More scientific work needs to be done.  There is technical knowledge and experience within petroleum industry.


Download ppt "Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google