1. Simlandscape and The Cadastral Landuse Model (CLM) ROB DE WAARD, TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS (RSDEWAARD@NIEUWLAND.NL)

2. Participative local and regional planning and development is difficult and complex. How can one develop a scenario with many others? How can one collect, assemble and follow all the relevant information? How can scenarios be assessed? Simlandscape helps you to answer these questions.

3. WHAT IS SIMLANDSCAPE ? A kind of SimCity for spatial planning: It is a geographical model that can be used to explore the present and future developments through a kind of “simulation” which helps communication of ideas

4. WHAT IS SIMLANDSCAPE ? The difference with SimCity however is that Simlandscape: Is not a computer game but a toolbox for scenario research and design. Deals not with players but with the actors in the spatial planning process – researchers and designers of plans, landowners and other users. Works with all kind of real monitoring data, with research data and with design data. Can visualize scenarios and research and evaluate them also in a quantative way.

5. WHAT IS THE CADASTRAL LANDUSE MODEL? CLM is the ‘technology’ behind Simlandscape a descriptive transformation model about the cultural landscape and how it changes as a result of the interaction of actors, ‘translated’ into a method for scenario research and design and into a GIS research model.

6. PRESENTATION Conceptual basics Applications Examples

7. CONCEPTUAL TRANSFORMATION MODEL Cadastral properties are cells of change of cultural landscapes VIRTUAL CONCEPTS PHYSICAL CHANGE OF LANDSCAPES “Idea – artefact” transformation through cadastral property Physical transformation of culture areas occurs ultimately in the enabling framework of property

8. CONCEPTUAL TRANSFORMATION MODEL ALL KINDS OF INTERACTIONS INFLUENCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CADASTRAL PROPERTIES CADASTRAL OWNERS AND THEIR PROPERTIES NATUREADMINISTRATION CHANGE IN OCCUPATION = CHANGE IN LANDSCAPE MARKETS OTHER USERS

9. LANDSCAPE TX LANDSCAPES CONSIST OF CELLS OF CHANGE LANDSCAPE T0 CADASTRAL UNITS ARE CELLS OF CHANGE TRANSFORMATION IS A POLYCENTRIC PROCES

10. CADASTRAL UNITS SUBSTRATUS UNITS CADASTRAL ASSEMBLAGE PLATE POLICY ZONES CLM LANDSCAPE TRANSFORMATION MODEL

11. LANDSCAPE MODELLING IN SIMLANDSCAPE CADASTRAL SPACEUSEFORMS FOREST RESERVE CLUSTER OF RESIDENTIAL FORMS CAR DEALER TREE NURSERYCAMPING C GLASSHOUSE CANAL DIARY FARM MILL (MONUMENT) DIARY FARM CADASTRAL ASSEMBLAGE LAYER SOIL & WATER LANDSCAPE SCENARIO ASSEMBLAGE

12. APPLICATIONS CONCEPTUAL MODEL DATA HANDLING FOR SCENARIO METHOD INFORMATION SYSTEM CADASTRAL TYPOLOGY METHOD (PARTICIPATIVE) WORKING PROCEDURE FOR SCENARIO METHOD GAME SIMULATION QUANTATIVE OUTPUT ASSESMENT PROJECTS AND SCENARIOS GLOBAL DATA MODEL

13. SCENARIO COMMUNICATION TOOL LANDOWNERS DEVELOPERS ADMINISTRATION OTHER USERS PROPERTIES PROJECTS POLICYZONES STAKEHOLDER VALUES PARTICIPATIVE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT EACH SCENARIO CAN BE EXPRESSED IN EACH ‘ACTOR LANGUAGE’ (PERSPECTIVE) CLM OPERATIONALIZES THE IDEA THAT TRANSFORMATION IS A POLYCENTRIC PROCES

14. GIS TOOL FOR MONITORING AND SCENARIO RESEARCH TOPOGRAPHICAL DATA ECONOMICAL DATA ET CETERA WATER DATA CADASTRAL DATA SOIL DATA REGIONALE CLM DATASET (GIS) OUPUT EVALUATION MODELS OF PROPOSED SITUATIONS MODELS OF EXPECTED SITUATIONS CONSTRUCTION OF SCENARIOS USING CLM TYPOLOGY METHOD SOLUTION FOR COMPATIBILITY PROBLEM BY (DES)AGGREGATION OF REALITY AND IDEA DATA MODEL OF PRESENT SITUATION QUERIES ON PRESENT SITUATION

15. SCENARIO CLASSIFICATION PRESENT SITUATION OR 0-SCENARIO PROPOSED SITUATIONS (PLANS) OR PROPOSITIONAL SCENARIOS EXPECTED SITUATIONS OR PROGNOSTIC SCENARIOS

16. SCENARIO CLASSIFICATION PRESENT SITUATION OR 0-SCENARIO PROPOSITIONAL SCENARIOS PROGNOSTIC SCENARIOS TREND SCENRIOS (GAME) SIMULATION SCENARIOS POLICY/PLAN SCENARIOS SPECULATIVE SCENARIOS OWNER SCENARIOS POLICY REALISATION SCENARIOS OWNER SCENARIOS

17. 0-SCENARIO MONITORING DATA ON PRESENT SITUATION

18. ELEMENTARY TYPOLOGY cadastral units ECONOMICAL FUNCTIONS classification after economical use SPATIAL TYPOLOGY classification after presence and weight of physical landuse components SPACEUSEFORMS Metatypology of economical use and outlay of physical landuse components.

19. URBAN ECONOMIC FUNCTIONS 0-SCENARIO Vertalen aub Nature reserve Building industry Services Trade Infrastructure Mixed industry Agro business Residential Residential + building industry Residential + trade Residential + mixed industry

20. BASIC SPATIAL TYPOLOGY 0-SCENARIO Country estates Fields Pastorales (rustic) Yards Larger estates Infrastructure(pm)

21. USER VALUE FOR ANIMALS OF HALF-OPEN LANDSCAPE Dataset t 0 X demand program animals of halfopen landscapes 0-SCENARIO ANALYSIS Not included in calculations High value Low value

22. OWNER SCENARIOS TRANSFORMATION CHARATERISTICS FOR ENQUIERY AND DATA RED SHIFT Nature, forest, green, grasland, field, orchard, pavement, building GREEN SHIFT AREA SPEED UP SLOW DOWN USE NETWORK RELATEDEARTH RELATED LAND USE COMPONENTS EXPECTED ?WISHED ? TRANSFORMATIONS IN EnlargeShrink

23. OWNERS WHO WISH TO REALIZE NEW LANDUSE COMPONENTS 0WNER SCENARIOS Industrial building hard surface green Residential building hard surface green Industrial building, hard & green surface Residential idem Mixed, green hard surface green + hard

24. EXPECTED FUNCTION CHANGE DIAGRAM OWNER SCENARIOS Expected agricultural development Expected development natural reserves Expected urban development

25. PLANSCENARIO “MIX” (RE)DEVELOPMENT ZONES Estates Industrial farming Country houses Small farming and recreation GREEN AND BLUE STRUCTURES Eco zone Brooks (existing) Lakes and dams

26. 1. NULSCENARIO2. OWNER SCENARIO 3. PORTFOLIO DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 4. PLAN SCENARIO 5. PLAN REALIZATION SCENARIO’S PLANREALIZATIONSCENARIOS

27. c 6 Designmodel: advanced intensive pilot industrial area intensive landuse industrial areas geavanceerd 43% 13% 44% 1,48 PROJECT PORTFOLIO (database) PROJECT X

28. d 75% Traditional intensive 6 50% futuristic advanced 43% traditional 60% PROJECT ANALYSIS: DESIGN ALTERNATIVES SSI HSI BSI 25% 20% 13% 15% 5% 44% FSI 1,00 1,25 0,75 0,00 0,80 1,48 2,00 50% 1,00 INTENSIVE LANDUSE INDUSTRIAL AREAS

29. PLANREALIZATIONSCENARIO Landmobility (planscenario X expected owner behaviour) Mix Variant 1 Available land Non available land Demand for land

30. PLANREALIZATIONSCENARIO Development profile (landmobility X planscenario rules) Mix Variant 1 development space for … Pastorales (rustic) Park Larger estates Country estates Agriculture