1. Module 5 Collecting evidence, raising awareness and building partnerships Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials developed with the support of the European Commission

2. Tools supporting awareness raising and partnership building 2 Assessing evidence Climate Change Vulnerability and adaptation assessments Macro and meso economic analysis Demonstration or pilot projects Engaging key actors Communication & advocacy strategy National consensus on and commitment environmental and climate change mainstreaming Awareness raising & partnership building Adapted from: UNDP-UNEP (2009, 2011) Preliminary assessments Development- environment- climate change linkages Governmental, institutional and political contexts Integrated Ecosystems Assessments Understanding environmental challenges and cc science

3. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment Bridge between science and policy Uses of an Integrated Ecosystem Assessment: –Identify priorities of action and analyse trade-offs –Provide foresight in relation to the likely consequences of decisions affecting ecosystems –Identify response options to achieve human development and sustainability goals –Provide a framework and source of tools for assessment, planning and management –Act as a benchmark for future assessments and guide future research Source: UNDP-UNEP (2009) 3

4. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment 4 Endogenous and exogenous drivers Changes in ecosystem condition: Biophysical Chemical Biodiversity Changes in ecosystem services: Provisioning Regulating Supporting Cultural Human well- being: Income Health Poverty Intrinsic value Evaluating trade-offs Adapted from: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005)

5. Approach to Integrated Ecosystem Assessment 1.Assessment of conditions and trends in ecosystems and their services 2.Development of future scenarios 3.Consideration of response options 5

6. Pilot integrated ecosystem assessment – Bugesera, Rwanda 6 Human well-being & poverty reduction Material well-being: Agricultural productivity decreases and impacts on human well-being and poverty. Health: Poor water & sanitation and water quality, limited access to IRVs Security: Deteriorates / fewer resources. Freedom of choice and action: Diminishes/limited capacity and access to resources Indirect drivers Demographic: If conditions get very bad (drought, famine, etc) might be migration; if rains good then population growth. Economic: As result of poor health and productivity, economy weakens Socio-political: Could become unstable due to conflict over resources Cultural: Could increase tensions depending on availability or resources Ecosystems & their services Water: Increase in water stress/ drying up of lakes, wetlands cultivated, access to main water supply is limited Food: Lowered productivity and overall decrease in food production Fuel wood: Lack of fuel wood; limited access to alternative energy sources Biodiversity: Decline, indigenous species disappearing, wildlife habitat lost Direct drivers Land use: Encroaching and cultivation of marginal and protected areas. Water use: Dependency on lakes unreliable and poor water quality. Exploitation of wetlands and irrigation schemes not sustainable. Pollution: Prevalence of water-borne diseases bound to increase due to poor sanitation standards and poor quality. Adapted from: UNEP/UNDP/GOR (2007)

7. Climate Change vulnerability and adaptation assessment A vulnerability and adaptation assessment would typically focus on 3 units of analysis: –Places: land, water, ecosystems, ‘natural capital’ and ‘built infrastructure’ –People: individuals, communities, ‘human capital’, livelihoods –Institutions: sectors, organisations, how they relate to each other, ‘social capital’ It should assess both current & future vulnerability to determine possible adaptation measures Source: Downing & Patwardhan (2004) 7

8. Steps in community vulnerability & adaptation assessment Source: IPCC (2007c) 4 th Assessment Report, WG II - Fig. 16.3 8

9. Mapping vulnerability 9 Source: Economics of Climate Adaptation (2009) Test case on Samoa – Focus on risks caused by sea level rise, Fig. 03, p. 122

10. Macro- and meso-economic analysis (environment and climate change) Economic analysis may be a powerful tool for motivating policy makers to take action –Macro level: analysis of the impact environmental degradation and/or climate change may have on the national economy –Meso level: analysis at the level of key sectors or sub- sectors of the national economy The costs of inaction (environmental degradation and/or climate-related losses) are compared with the net benefits of taking action (avoided losses minus costs) The analysis should also consider the distribution of losses and benefits (among social groups, regions...) 10

11. Demonstration projects Demonstration/ pilot projects Test what works and does not work (relevance, effectiveness) Support lesson drawing for adaptive management Mobilise communities, local/regional authorities & other stakeholders Help foster interest and commitment of national authorities & other stakeholders Create motivation and knowledge for replication/ scaling-up 11 Source: UNDP-UNEP (2011)

12. Who might be good champions? Are there already champions? Raising awareness and building partnerships (1) Assessing available evidence: –using the findings of relevant studies and demonstration/pilot projects Engaging key actors: –identifying and mobilising key organisations involved in development at the national and sector levels –identifying and mobilising ‘champions’ 12

13. Raising awareness and building partnerships (2) Developing and implementing a communication and advocacy strategy in support of mainstreaming: –Define the target audience to be informed or influenced –Develop policy-relevant messages and materials based on evidence collected (e.g. policy briefs, radio programmes) –Select and use appropriate communication channels for the various target groups (e.g. media, sector working groups) 13

14. Discussion and action planning 14

15. Turning words into action Understanding the global environmental challenges and climate change science Collecting evidence, raising awareness and building partnerships 15 What can be done and what are the institutional and capacity needs in your country / sector of work?

16. Recap – Key messages Awareness raising and partnership building help build consensus and commitment to mainstreaming Assess evidence about the state of the environment, climate change and their impacts as a starting point –evidence may be available, inter alia, from ecosystem assessments, vulnerability and adaptation assessments, economic analysis and demonstration projects –new evidence may need to be generated Strategic approach needed for knowledge management, communication and advocacy – ‘champions’ play an important role Evidence supports engagement of key actors and the development of a communication and advocacy strategy 16

17. Key references UNEP (2005) Communicating Sustainability: How to produce effective public campaigns. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi Adaptation Learning Mechanism knowledge-sharing platform: http://www.adaptationlearning.net/http://www.adaptationlearning.net/ Hassan, R; Scholes, E and Ash, N (Eds.) (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: findings of the condition and trends Working Group v.1: Current State and Trends (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Island Press: World Bank – Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change web pages: http://climatechange.worldbank.org/content/economics- adaptation-climate-change-study-homepage http://climatechange.worldbank.org/content/economics- adaptation-climate-change-study-homepage 17

18. References Downing T. & Patwardhan A. (2004) Assessing Vulnerability for Climate Adaptation. In: Lim B. & Spanger-Siegfried E. (eds.) (2004) Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures. United Nations Development Programme/Cambridge University Press, New York. Available from: http://www.undp.org/climatechange/adapt/apf.htmlhttp://www.undp.org/climatechange/adapt/apf.html Economics of Climate Adaptation Working Group (2009) Shaping climate-resilient development: a framework for decision-making. Climate Works Foundation, Global Environment Facility, European Commission, McKinsey & Company, The Rockfeller Foundation, Standard Chartered Bank & Swiss Re. Available from: http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/Social_Sector/our_practices/Economic_Development/Knowl edge_Highlights/Economics_of_climate_adaptation.aspx http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/Social_Sector/our_practices/Economic_Development/Knowl edge_Highlights/Economics_of_climate_adaptation.aspx IPCC (2007c) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Parry M.L., Canziani O.F., Palutikof J.P., van der Linden P.J. & Hanson C.E. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA. Available from: www.ipcc.chwww.ipcc.ch UNDP-UNEP (2009) Mainstreaming Poverty-Environment Linkages into Development Planning: A Handbook for Practitioners. UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment Initiative. Available from: http://www.unpei.org/PDF/PEI-full-handbook.pdf http://www.unpei.org/PDF/PEI-full-handbook.pdf UNDP-UNEP (2011) Mainstreaming Adaptation to Climate Change into Development Planning: A Guide for Practitioners. UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment Initiative. Available from: http://www.unpei.org/knowledge-resources/publications.html http://www.unpei.org/knowledge-resources/publications.html UNEP (2005) Communicating Sustainability: How to produce effective public campaigns. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. Available from: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0679xPA-CommunicatingEN.pdf http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0679xPA-CommunicatingEN.pdf UNEP, UNDP, GOR (Government of Rwanda) (2007) Pilot Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of Bugesera. 18