Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCaitlin Montgomery Modified over 8 years ago
1
rBGH, Hormones, Breast Cancer, and Pink Ribbons
Martin Donohoe
2
Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH)
aka recombinant Bovine Somatotropin (rBST), brand name Posilac© 10-15% of U.S. dairy cows injected with rBGH Used to increase milk production by cattle
3
rBGH Marketed primarily to large dairy farms (LDFs), which are supplanting small dairy farms LDFs have Worse environmental impact records Higher rates of workplace injuries Contribute to decreasing agricultural diversity
4
Effects of rBGH on Humans
Serum IGF-1 levels increase 13% above baseline in individuals drinking milk from rBGH-treated cattle IGF-1 interacts with estrogens, androgens, and other growth promoters Milk is the food most associated with high IGF-1 levels IGF-1 not important in yogurt, since it is used as a food source by some of the bacteria responsible for yogurt production
5
Risks of rBGH IGF-1 is a suspected contributor to breast, prostate and GI cancers Promotes cell division and reduces apoptosis (preprogrammed cell death) in animals Inhibits the ability of various anti-cancer drugs to kill cultured human breast cancer cells
6
Risks of rBGH Along with pesticides, other endocrine disruptors, and obesity, IGF-1 may be partly responsible for earlier onset of puberty (9.9 yrs in 2006, compared with 10.9 years in 1991) Women who eat dairy products deliver twins at five times the rate of vegans
7
Risks of rBGH Children, who have more years of life to live and drink more milk (and more milk per body weight) than adults, are disproportionately affected Some evidence suggests rBGH milk being funneled to U.S. children through school lunch programs Many school systems have gone rBGH-free
8
Harmful Effects of rBGH
FDA: rBGH causes 16 different harmful conditions in cattle, including heat stress, hoof disorders, GI disturbances, birth disorders, ovarian and uterine problems, and mastitis Antibiotic treatment of mastitis leads to increased antibiotic resistance in cattle and humans
9
rBGH (Posilac©) Originally developed and marketed by Monsanto
Sold to Elanco, a division of Eli Lilly, in 2008
10
Monsanto Agent Orange, PCBs, dioxins DDT
Largest producer of genetically-modified seeds Contamination events Unethical experiments Harassment of scientists
11
Monsanto Pesticide Roundup used in “War on Drugs” in Colombia
Profitable Member of corporate front groups fighting food safety legislation/organizations
12
Monsanto Roger Beachy (long-time president of the Danforth Plant, Monsanto’s nonprofit arm) now chief of USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture, overseeing almost $500 million in grants and research funding
13
Monsanto Islam Siddiqui, VP at CropLife America (US branch of CropLife International, an agribusiness front group led by Monsanto and others) Obama’s Chief Agricultural Negotiator for the US Trade Representative’s Office
14
Eli Lilly Paid record-setting settlement of $1.42 billion to US Justice Department for illegally marketing Zyprexa to children and elderly for non-FDA approved indications Multiple other instances o illegal and unethical marketing
15
Eli Lilly Manufactures antibiotics used to treat mastitis
Produces Gemzar (used to treat breast cancer)
16
Elanco Marketed diethylstilbestrol (DES) for almost 2 decades despite data showing link between DES exposure in mothers and clear cell vaginal cancers in offspring Outlawed for human use in 1971 Banned for use in cattle in 1979
17
Elanco Manufactures ractopamine (Paylean), a beta agonist given to livestock for last 7-28 days of life to increase protein synthesis OK’d by FDA, but banned in 160 nations Can cause hyperactivity and muscle breakdown Dangerous for human consumption
18
Elanco 2009: Elanco paper, commissioned through PR company Porter-Novelli, authors paid by Elacno Loaded with misinformation (see report and OR pSR rebuttal on phsj website) Authors admit falsely claiming AMA and AAP endorsements for rBGH, misstate ACS’s neutral position
19
FDA Approval of rBGH OK’d for use by FDA in 1993; on market since 1994
FDA official (and former Monsanto attorney) Michael Taylor oversaw process – became Monsanto VP after leaving FDA; now senior advisor to FDA Commissioner
20
FDA Approval of rBGH FDA relied on industry summary of internal tests
GAO investigation: Found 3 FDA employees involved in decision had conflicts of interest and multiple ethics rules violations Criticized sloppy, manipulative science, lack of data on human health effects
21
rBGH Worldwide Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and the European Union have banned rBGH The Codex Alimentarius, the UN’s main food safety body, has refused to certify rBGH as safe
22
Opposition to rBGH APHA ANA Health Care Without Harm
AMA President Ron Davis (’07-’08) BMJ
23
Opposition to rBGH Humane Society Animal Protection Institute
Humane Farming Association Farm Sanctuary ACS – no formal position (2009); previously supported rBGH
24
rBGH Today All fluid milk products in Oregon now rBGH-free
55 of the top 100 U.S. dairies are now at least partially rBGH-free or have announced that they will be Starbucks’ (company-owned stores), Chipotle, 160 hospitals nationwide rBGH-free
25
Hormones in Beef Six steroid hormones routinely used in US beef production: estradiol, testosterone, progesterone, zeranol. melengestrol, trenbolone DES (linked to clear cell vaginal and cervical cancers used through 1979, even though banned for humans in 1971
26
Hormones in Beef Since 1988, use of steroids in cattle production illegal in Europe US government states hormone residues in beef from adult cattle pose no threat to human health Endocrine Society, APHA, others disagree
27
Other reproductive toxins/carcinogens
Phthalates, bis-phenol A (BPA), pesticides (persistent organic pollutants) Body burden high (EWG) Nursing infants at top of food chain
28
Hormone-Related Diseases on the Rise
Breast and prostate cancers Thyroid disease Obesity Diabetes Endometriosis Uterine fibroids Infertility
29
Hormones in the Food Supply
Earlier onset of breast development and puberty in young girls Altered sex ratio (more girls, fewer boys) Increasing cryptorchidism Risk factor for testicular cancer Micropenis, hypospadias increasing
30
Pink Ribbon Campaigns Positive aspects: Negative aspects: Pinkwashing
Community of survivors Fund raising Research Advocacy $30 million raised per year through pink ribbon campaigns Negative aspects: Pinkwashing
31
Pinkwashing Outgrowth of the transformation of corporate philanthropy in the 1980s and 1990s to "strategic philanthropy" and "cause-related marketing“ No one owns the pink ribbon image or oversees its use
32
Pinkwashing Pink ribbon packaging can mean donations to breast cancer research with or without cap with or without use of coupon ongoing or time-limited or simply to raise awareness of breast cancer
33
Pink Ribbons Avon Breast Cancer Crusade, Komen Foundation spend up to 25% of money raised on overhead Breast Cancer Awareness Month created by Astra Zeneca (manufacturer of tamoxifen) AZ was a leading manufacturer of pesticides until corporate reorganization in 2000
34
Pinkwashing "Consumption philanthropy" may dampen people's willingness to make direct charitable donations Pink ribbon products can be carcinogenic, production may involve labor and even human rights violations
35
Egregious Examples of Pinkwashing
Cosmetics teens use avg. 17 personal care products/d adults 12/d Yoplait – rBGH Jingle Jugs
36
Cosmetics ACS's "Look Good...Feel Better" program provides 30,000 women per year with a free makeover and bag of makeup donated by the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrance Assn Cosmetics contain a number of environmental toxins See Environmental Working Group website for database of toxins in cosmetics
37
Environmental Causes of Breast Cancer
Komen Foundation and American Cancer Society largely ignore environmental contributors to breast cancer ACS allocates less than 0.1% of its annual budget to environmental and occupational causes of cancer
38
Environmental Causes of Breast Cancer
ACS “Excalibur Donors” ($100,000+/yr) include big Pharma and petrochemical, industrial waste, auto, cosmetic, and junk food companies 2010: ACS rejects President’s Cancer Panel Report, “Reducing Environmental Cancer,” which concluded that “the true environmental burden of environmentally-induced cancers has been grossly underestimated”
39
What Can You Do? Read the fine print when you buy pink Avoid bottled water - use a refillable stainless steel bottle Avoid milk products from rBGH-treated cattle Eat organic, free-range beef if you are not vegetarian Do not microwave food in plastic containers
40
What Can You Do? Avoid cooking in non-stick pans and eating foods packaged with non-stick plastic Get recommended breast exams, mammograms Get angry at corporate malefactors for polluting the environment and food supply e.g., GE-NY Presbyterian agreement Spread the word
41
Further Information Campaign for Safe Food, Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility:
42
Public Health and Social Justice Website
Contact Information Public Health and Social Justice Website
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.