1. AEIS REPORT 2009-10 SAN FELIPE DEL RIO C.I.S.D.

2. OVERVIEW Academic Year: 2009-10 Academic Year: 2009-10 SFDRCISD Rating: Academically Acceptable SFDRCISD Rating: Academically Acceptable AEIS DATA SOURCES: AEIS DATA SOURCES: * Assessment Program * PEIMS Purpose of AEIS Report Purpose of AEIS Report

3. An Overview of the Academic Excellence Indicator System Report (AEIS) The AEIS Report pulls together a wide range of information on the performance of students in each school district in Texas every year. This information is put into the annual AEIS reports which are made available to schools districts and the public during the fall. The performance indicators are: State Administered Assessment Performance: by Special Groups, Grades, and Subjects, including Alternative Assessments Student Success Initiative Attendance Rates Completion and Drop Out Rates (4 Year Longitudinal) Percent of Graduates Completing the Recommended High School Program Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate (IB) Exam Results SAT and ACT Examination Participation and Results PEIMS Data: Budget, Financial, Staff, Demographics, Special Program Participation, Attendance, Retention, and “Leavers” (Graduates/Dropouts) State and District Performance Reports Campus Performance Reports

4. Points to Consider The information in AEIS provides factual foundation for dialogue about the performance of our district or campuses. The information in AEIS provides factual foundation for dialogue about the performance of our district or campuses. Do not rely on a single indicator, such as test scores, to draw absolute conclusions about student learning or school performance. Do not rely on a single indicator, such as test scores, to draw absolute conclusions about student learning or school performance. Student learning and school performance should be analyzed in the context of each school's unique environment and characteristics. Student learning and school performance should be analyzed in the context of each school's unique environment and characteristics. The opinions of parents, school staff, and students can be very helpful in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of schools. The opinions of parents, school staff, and students can be very helpful in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of schools. Remember to look at school performance over time. Remember to look at school performance over time. SSI-2005, 5th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2008, 8 th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2005, 5th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2008, 8 th graders must pass the Reading and Math TAKS to be promoted. SSI-2010, 3 rd graders no longer included in SSI SSI-2010, 3 rd graders no longer included in SSI Exemplary – For every subject, at least 90% of the tested students met standard or Exemplary – For every subject, at least 90% of the tested students met standard or met standard with TPM. met standard with TPM. Recognized – For every subject, at least 80% of the tested students met standard or Recognized – For every subject, at least 80% of the tested students met standard or met floor and required improvement or met standard with TPM. met floor and required improvement or met standard with TPM. Academically Acceptable – Varies by subject: Academically Acceptable – Varies by subject: Reading/ELA – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Reading/ELA – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Writing – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Writing – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Social Studies – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Social Studies – At least 70% of the tested students pass the test. Mathematics – At least 60% of the tested students pass the test. Mathematics – At least 60% of the tested students pass the test. Science – At least 55% of the tested students pass the test. Science – At least 55% of the tested students pass the test. or met Required Improvement or met standard with TPM or met Required Improvement or met standard with TPM

5. Reading / ELAMathWritingScienceSocial Studies 20092010 2009 (55%) 2010 (60%)20092010 2009 (50%) 2010 (55%) 2009 (65%) 2010 (70%) District 84857379949170759093 DRHS 88916878 64779295 DR 9th 88896672 DRMS 82837476969366648889 Garfield 8084 8596918280 N Heights 8184858390889184 SFMMS 79826879 E Side 9192898299957589 Lamar 8066787092727759 B. Vista 8990869190938794 Chavira 90959697 959394 Calderon 7675787691966170 L Green 8685818894838785 Yellow Highlight Indicates Increase TAKS MET STANDARD (SUM OF ALL GRADES)(ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATOR)

6. SAMPLE STUDY USING THE AEIS REPORTS 2006-2007 2007-20082008-20092009-2010 Staff 1,360.801,261.101,284.501,290.80 Professional 772.7778.4780.2793.8 Teacher 644.4648.9659.2665.2 Professional Support 86.788.57781.6 Campus Administration 30.6313534 Central Admin 1110913 Educational Aides 148.9146.5159.5157.3 Auxiliary Staff 439.1336.1344.8339.7 Turnover Rate for Teachers10.313.812.111.3 BUDGETED REVENUE INFORMATION Total Revenue $79,136,852$87,140,231$88,906,647$89,732,572 Total Revenue Per Pupil $5,699$6,413$6,522$6,564 BUDGETED EXPENDITURE INFORMATION Expenditures $79,219,566$82,102,322$94,378,525$97,134,476 Expenditures Per Pupil $5,448$5,876$6,201$6,241

7. SAMPLE STUDY USING THE AEIS REPORTS (cont) DRHS2006-20072007-20082008-20092009-2010 Total Students 1,9812,1012,0822,005 9th Grade 5038930 10th Grade 767800719703 11th Grade 641664686670 12th Grade 523599584632 StateRegionDistrict English Language Learners Progress Indicator 2009-2010797773 2008-2009767368

27. Analysis 3 rd Grade Math in 2006 the number tested was 205 students ( % met standard =67%) In 2010 the number was reduced to 18 students (% met standard=39%)

30. PSAT (Pretest for the SAT) October 2008: 269 October 2009: 342 October 2010: 529 PLAN (Pretest for ACT) October 2010: 549 PSAT (Pretest for the SAT) October 2008: 269 October 2009: 342 October 2010: 529 PLAN (Pretest for ACT) October 2010: 549

31. College Entrance Exams SAT/ACT (updated): June 2009- May 2010: 305 June 2010-December 2010: 278 College Entrance Exams SAT/ACT (updated): June 2009- May 2010: 305 June 2010-December 2010: 278 December 2010-June 2011 ENROLLING

32. 2010 Graduating class: Students attending (info is based on student admission letters and parent & student input): *4 yr university: 146 *2 yr *community/technical/ vocational college: 313 *Military: 49 2010 Graduating class: Students attending (info is based on student admission letters and parent & student input): *4 yr university: 146 *2 yr *community/technical/ vocational college: 313 *Military: 49

33. Class of 2010 Scholarship offers: Approximately 5 million dollars Applied for Financial Aid: Close to 400

34. National Hispanic Recognition Program Scholars: 2009: 4 students National Hispanic Recognition Program Scholars: 2009: 4 students Lauren Cardenas, Carlos Rubio, Carlos Garza, Julio Rivera 2010: 7 students 2010: 7 students Rhiannon Chavez, Lizandra Santillan, Michael Dozier, Michael Garza, Stephen Cantu, Antonio Martinez, Anthony Medellin

35. SAT SAT 2007 Seniors: 174 2007 Seniors: 174 2008 Seniors: 203 2008 Seniors: 203 2009 Seniors: 150 2009 Seniors: 150 2010 Seniors: 220 2010 Seniors: 220 2011 Seniors up to date: 204 with an additional 47 students to test on Jan. 22, 2011 2011 Seniors up to date: 204 with an additional 47 students to test on Jan. 22, 2011 ACT ACT 2007:71 2007:71 2008:69 2008:69 2009:49 2009:49 2010: 85 2010: 85 2011 up to date: 74 with an additional 31 students to test on Feb. 12, 2011 2011 up to date: 74 with an additional 31 students to test on Feb. 12, 2011

36. Attendance Rate (2008-09):