1. NYCOM Visibility Project March 2, 2011

2. The Context for the Conversation Raising the visibility of the osteopathic medical school in the context of NYIT will benefit the whole and each of its parts Branding NYIT and NYCOM separately is expensive and counterproductive We need to find a way to develop NYCOM as a highly visible sub-brand of NYIT

3. The Committee Why improve visibility?” Define audiences Develop, administer, analyze survey Brainstorm visibility initiatives Evaluate initiatives in view of the survey results Set priorities for action

4. From the committee

5. Improving visibility would improve… Student and faculty quality Donations Pride Prestige Research support

6. “Visibility” is not the whole story “Pride” is critical (students, alumni, faculty), as is “Reputation” (external audiences)

7. Survey Research

8. Goals Determine baseline awareness, image, and perception of NYCOM in the context of NYIT Establish key potential messages that reflect audience interests and institutional strengths

9. Key constituencies for the survey Current students Alumni Faculty (Old Westbury) Faculty (Clinical) Faculty (who are alumni as a sub-category)

10. Survey Sample n= 1,011 NumberResponse Rate Current Students43037% Alumni46920% Faculty (alumni)45n/a Faculty (clinical)298% Faculty (Old Westbury)3863%

11. Survey results

12. NYCOM’s Reputation

13. What is your overall opinion of NYCOM today? Would you recommend NYCOM to a friend or relative considering osteopathic medicine? Looking back, how would you rate your decision to attend (work at) NYCOM?

14. NYCOM Overall “Good/Very Good” Recommend to friend/relative Good decision/ place to work Current Students64%90%84% Alumni59%89%78% Faculty (alumni)71%93%98%/94% Faculty (clinical)83%100%85% Faculty (OW)92%61%92%

15. Observations Perceptions of NYCOM are generally favorable “Recommend” and “good decision” scores are very high

16. Elements in Medical School’s Reputation Student quality Name recognition Cutting-edge Pride Accomplishments of graduates Innovative curriculum Residencies at best hospitals Research/ other newsworthy output

17. NYCOM’s Reputational Strengths Use of technology in teaching and learning Attractive Long Island location Clinical experiences and residency placements

18. NYCOM’s Reputational Weaknesses Cost Availability of scholarships Large classes

19. NYCOM in the context of NYIT

20. Respondents feel separate from NYIT “I know NYCOM is part of NYIT but we function almost completely independently. We might as well be separate.”

21. There is a vocal, resentful minority “NYCOM is too much under NYIT’s thumb.”

22. But NYIT is better known in the wider community and some make use of the association “Nobody knows what you are talking about when you say NYCOM…I just say I go to medical school at NYIT.”

23. Committee Conclusions

24. We must build visibility and reputation to deal with high cost Students can’t keep paying higher tuition and NYCOM’s cost is its biggest weakness Visibility, pride, and reputation can help support establishment of new revenue sources

25. The high opinion about technology is an opportunity How can we make use of it?

26. Education isn’t sexy Medical school visibility is ordinarily linked to its hospital affiliation Can the high opinion of NYCOM’s clinical experiences and residencies work in a similar fashion?

27. Are these things enough to build a reputation?

28. What about the name?

29. Many constituents are neutral or negative about the name “NYCOM” Of total respondents, those who are positive are fewer but have stronger feelings (*p<.05) Attitude towards the name “NYCOM” PositiveNeutralNegative Current Students56%35%8% Alumni48%43%9% Faculty (alumni)62%38%0% Faculty (clinical)48% 3% Faculty (OW)68%32%0%

30. More than half of students and alumni are pro or neutral about a change (*p<.01) Campus-based faculty are most opposed Attitude toward name change In favorNeutralOpposed Current Students16%37%47% Alumni16%47%37% Faculty (alumni)0%44%56% Faculty (clinical)7%72%21% Faculty (OW)8%35%57%

31. The committee’s view Building quality and reputation are critical and are the most important things. If the name is going to change, just go ahead and do it. A name change should be part of something bigger that will build the visibility and reputation of the school

32. The consultant’s view There is much support for a more organized and effective brand strategy Care must be taken to develop a brand architecture that aligns the NYIT super brand and the NYCOM sub-brand This architecture must also include a graphic identity that clearly establishes the relationship between NYIT and NYCOM

33. Next Steps