1. ERT 445/2 FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1 SESI 2015/2016 WRITTEN PROPOSAL WRITTEN PROPOSAL

2. RECAP – MARKS DISTRIBUTION NoEvaluatorComponent% Total % 1Supervisor Problem statement & Research objective report 1040 Literature review report15 Methodology report15 2 Internal examiner Proposal report2550 Proposal presentation25 3CoordinatorLog book10 TOTAL100

3. WRITTEN PROPOSAL Title page Executive summary – max of 1 page Table of content Introduction – 2-3 pages Problem statement – max of 1 page Objective – at least 3 objectives,max of 4 objective – 1 page Literature review – 8-1 0 pages Methodology – 3- 5 pages Gantt chart – 1 page Milestones – 1 page Expected resulted – max 1 page Reference - min of 10 latest ref within 5 years (2010-2015) FULL PROPOSAL SHOULD NOT EXCEED 25 PAGES MUST HAVE:

4. EVALUATION

5. WRITTEN PROPOSAL - RUBRIC NOCRITERIAEXEMPLARY (4)PROFICIENT (3)ACCEPTABLE (2)UNACCEPTABLE (1) 1 Organization & Style  Excellent flow of information according to the UniMAP standard format and guidelines.  Good flow of information according to the UniMAP standard format and guidelines.  Moderate flow of information according to the UniMAP standard format and guidelines.  Poor flow of information according to the UniMAP standard format and guidelines. 2 Content & Knowledge  Fully meet the level of knowledge required by the course.  Sufficiently fulfil the level of knowledge required by the course.  Partially meet the level of knowledge required by the course.  Insufficient level of knowledge required by the course. 3 Executive Summary  The executive summary is professional and creates a curiosity in the reader to go further in the report.  The executive summary is just a correct compounding of the report content.  One of the important information about the project is missing (e.g. problem statement, solution procedure, deliverables)  The executive summary lacks a lot of relevant information about the project.

6. NOCRITERIAEXEMPLARY (4)PROFICIENT (3)ACCEPTABLE (2) UNACCEPTABLE (1) 4 Compose problem statement  Clearly defined and state concise the problem statement sentence to address the issue.  Adequately define and state problem statement to address the issue  Inadequate problem statement and not addressing the real issues  Fail to identify and state the problem statement 5 Rational of techniques used  All techniques used during the experiment very well explained.  All techniques used during the experiment were explained.  Some techniques used during the experiment were not explained clearly.  Some techniques used during the experiment were not explained. 6Findings /Result [Expected finding]  Thorough comparison and contrast of findings are provided and relate to the main discussion points in the order of their appearance in the purpose statement.  Focus is on research findings rather than research methods.  Comparison and contrast of findings are sufficiently provided thoroughness.  Discussion of findings sufficiently relates to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.  Comparison and contrast of findings are provided but lack thoroughness.  Discussion of findings could relate better to the main discussion points in the purpose statement.  Comparison and contrast of findings are lacking.  Discussion of findings does not relate well to main discussion points in the purpose statement.

7. NOCRITERIAEXEMPLARY (4)PROFICIENT (3)ACCEPTABLE (2) UNACCEPTABLE (1) 7Grammar & Spelling  Rare errors in grammar and spelling are observed in the report.  Seldom errors in grammar and spelling are observed in the report.  Frequent errors in grammar and spelling are observed in the report.  Abundance of errors in grammar and spelling are observed in the report. 8References  Optimum number current references citation.  APA format is used accurately and consistently in the paper and on the “References” page.  Sufficient number current references citation  APA format is used with minor errors.  Partially sufficient number current references citation  There are frequent errors in APA format.  Inadequate number current references citation  Format of the document is not recognizable as APA.