Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Technology Application Partners for NCRST-E NCRST-E Fall 2001 Advisory Board Meeting.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Technology Application Partners for NCRST-E NCRST-E Fall 2001 Advisory Board Meeting."— Presentation transcript:

1 Technology Application Partners for NCRST-E NCRST-E Fall 2001 Advisory Board Meeting

2 New Technology Application Projects There have been new TAP’s selected, three of which have been associated with the NCRST-E: Virginia DOT Washington DOT Veridian

3 TAP’s, NCRST-E, and RSPA Contacts Increased Coordination Roles New TAP linked to NCRST-E Virginia DOT; Dan Widner widner_dk@vdot.state.va.us 804 - 786 - 6762 Washington DOT; E. Lanzer LanzerE@WADOT.WA.GOV 360-705-7476 Veridian; John Albasini John.Albasini@veridian.com 228 - 688 - 1504 Designated RSPA contact Aviva Brecher Aviva.Brecher@volpe.dot.gov 617 - 494 - 3470 Chip Wood Chip.Wood@ost.dot.gov 202 - 366 - 5911 Aviva Brecher

4 Regional Database Development for Transportation Planning john.@ John Albasini VERIDIAN Building 1100, Room 11139 Stennis (228) 688-1504 albasiniveridian.com

5 Project Partners Gulf Regional Planning Commission (GRPC) >Largest MPO in south Mississippi covering six coastal counties Southern Rapid Rail Transit Commission (SRRTC) >Planning agency comprised of commissioners from Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi Mississippi State University > Hosting IMS web server > Providing additional data for project Additional Interested Parties Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Mississippi Department of Marine Resources

6 Project Location

7 Transportation/Environmental Concern Project will allow transportation planners and environmental scientists to rapidly evaluate a project area and determine alternative solutions without having to conduct multiple field investigations.

8 Proposed Remote Sensing/GIS Solution Paradigm 1. Change detection analysis for updating landcover/ landuse 2. Sharing of data across the Internet via an Internet Map Server (IMS) 3. GIS based planning tool for automatic calculation of environmental impacts, creation of impact matrices and development of alignment mapping.

9 Project Funding and Cost Sharing RSPA Funding Cost Share Milestone 1. Database updating and development $70,517 $81,200 $151,717 2. Development and Integration of IMS $30,000 $16,000$ 46,000 3. Development of GIS planning tool $41,500 $ 3,000$ 44,500 4. Training on planning tool $ 7,000 $ 6,500$ 13,500 Grand Total $149,017 $106,700$255,717 Total Cost

10 Project Deliverables 1. GIS Vector Database with Imagery on CD-ROM 2. Report detailing DEM Comparison 3. Universal Resource Listing (URL) address for active IMS web site 4. Decision Support Planning Tool. 5. Quarterly Reports 6. Final Report

11 PROJECT TITLE: Automating Wetlands Identification to meet Federal Reporting Requirements Integration with existing GIS architecture to streamline the process for planned road construction projects

12 “As is” Planning Process Wetland surveys are conducted using: – 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual Supplemental information from: – National Wetland Inventory – 1959 Soil Survey (USDA-SCS) – Aerial photography – Field Reconnaissance

13 Remote Sensing and the Planning Process Remotely sensed wetlands data can be introduced early in the planning process Benefits include: – Incorporation with other available GIS data layers – Good preliminary indication of potential impact – Provides an accurate guide to field reconnaissance and survey

14 Integration with VDOT’s GIS Architecture Derived wetland polygons will be made available through VDOT GIS – Thin client, web-enabled, enterprise wide Oracle, ESRI/SDE, and ArcIMS software – Data will be integrated with other enterprise GIS Data

15 Planned Investigative Approach Route 17, City of Chesapeake Virginia

16 Review VDOT wetland identification processes for projects Review completed processes for Route 17 Acquire Erdas Sub-pixel software Identify and acquire imagery Establish reflectance ranges for vegetation types Planned Investigative Approach

17 Unsupervised and supervised classification routine refinement Output polygons to compare with existing GIS data (soil types, NWI) Compare to existing field reconnaissance data Load polygons into enterprise GIS to make available to Environmental Analysts Environmental Analysts “redline” data Redlines available to others via internal web GIS Planned Investigative Approach


Download ppt "Technology Application Partners for NCRST-E NCRST-E Fall 2001 Advisory Board Meeting."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google