1. EURONS The EUROpean Integrated Infrastructure Initiative in Nuclear Structure within FP6 Present status..........and remarks to FINUPHY Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

2. Project Coordinator: Alex C. Mueller (Orsay) Managing Institution: GSI Darmstadt 83 participating institutions from 27 countries The Project comprises: - 13 JRAs (Joint Research Activities) - 11 TNAs (TransNational Access) - 9 Networks Requested Budget: 34,1 M€ Expected duration of the contract: 5 years All information is available from the GSI docu- ment server http://www-new.gsi.de -> Information -> EURONS EURONS: overview Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

3. Members of the Writing Committee Rafal Broda (Krakow, Poland) Graziano Fortuna (Legnaro, Italy) Brian Fulton (York, GB) Dominique Goutte (GANIL, France) Muhsin Harakeh (KVI, Netherlands) Walter Henning (GSI, Germany) Jean Vervier (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

4. Milestones May/June 2002: Information to the European nuclear structure community by FINUPHY FINUPHY Meeting at Trento (28 Oct.2002) Presentation of ideas for JRAs FINUPHY Meeting of the Writing Committee at Mainz (7 Dec.2002) Selection of JRAs, suggestion of fundings for JRAs, TNAs, and Networks FINUPHY Meeting of Writing Committee, Coordinator, and Managing Institution at the occasion of the NuPECC Town Meeting at Darmstadt (31 Jan. 2003) Status and follow-ups of former decisions FINUPHY Meeting at Catania (27/28 Feb.2003) Presentation of status, assignment of individual and overall budgets 14 April: submission to the EC August 2003: Evaluation Report NuPECC meeting at Frascati (5-6 December 2003) Reports on EURONS and I3HP by the coordinators Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

5. TNAs - Overview Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

6. JRAs - Overview Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

7. Networks - Overview Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

8. Management structure General Assembly One representative of each laboratory Feedback from and to community, monitor progress Project Coordination Committee All project leaders and the managing team Support of Coordinator in all management issues, surveys the overall coherence of the activities -> elects an executive board (6 members) for rapid interaction with the Coordinator on pressing issues Administrative Project Controlling Administrative persons Keep track of financial situation, control „cash flow“ Project Coordinator The sole contact person for the EC, responsible for all scientific and administrative coordination of the project Activity Coordinator One person of each activity Manages the activity and represents it in the PCC Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

9. Result of Evaluation Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

10. Evaluation Summary Report In general: Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004 Overall Ranking of EURONS: a note of 4.5 and a position 25 (of more than 150 proposals) funding up to position 24 !

11. Evaluation Summary Report (II) In detail: Alex C. Mueller, NuPECC, Frascati (Italy) 5.-6. December 2003 Catania Jülich Uppsala

12. "Adjusted budget" Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004

13. Situation / Conclusion Alex C. Mueller, FINUPHY, Louvain-la-Neuve, May 3-4, 2004 The Proposal had one major deficiency, putting it in a waiting position In General, Networks were not convincingly enough presented Specific strong recommendation for NEEN/SEEN fusion Some colleagues which helped the EURONS Management Team to save the proposal should be warmely thanked C. Leclercq-Vilain, J. Vervier, S. Gales, J. Äystö, M. Harakeh, P. Van Duppen, G. Ryckewaert, D. Guerreau, W. Henning Consecutive to April, 28 2004 programme committee meeting, EURONS, (as well as the other remaining note 4.5 proposals), can now be fundes Very formally, the start of contract negociations is from July, 15 on (the I3 call's budget needs to be modified) Budget negociations on the level of "Evaluation Committee – 20%" Rather Strict Respect of Evaluation Committee's Recommendation