1. Christoph F. Eick www.cs.uh.edu/~ceick/ceick.html University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and Brokering 4. Critical Problems with Respect to Shared Ontologies Shared Ontologies

2. “Ontologies are content theories about sorts of objects, properties of objects, and relationship between objects that are possible in a specified domain of knowledge” (Chandrasekaran) “We consider ontologies to be domain theories that specify a domain-specific vocabulary of entities, classes, properties, predicates, and functions, and a set of relationships that necessarily hold among those vocabulary items” (Fikes) “Shared ontologies form the basis for domain specific knowledge representation languages” (Chandrasekaran) “If we could develop ontologies that could be used as the basis of multiple systems, they would share a common terminology that would facilitate sharing and reuse” (W. Swartout) “Ontologies play an important role for the standardization of terminology in medicine (e.g. UMLS) and other domains” “Ontologies can serve as the glue between knowledge that is represented at different, usually heterogeneous information sources.” What are Ontologies?

3. As a shared conceptual model of a particular application domain that describes the semantics of the objects that are part of the domain, and captures knowledge that is inherent to the particular domain --- idea: knowledge base. Ontologies provide a vocabulary for representing knowledge about a domain and for describing specific situations in a domain (tool for defining and describing domain-specific vocabularies) --- idea: language for communication For data/knowledge translation and transformation (provide a solution to the translation problem between different terminologies); for fusion and refinement of existing knowledge --- idea: interoperation For matchmaking between users, agents, and information resources in agent-based systems --- idea: collaboration, brokering focus of next slides As reusable building blocks to build systems that solve particular problems in the application domain --- idea: model reuse Summary: “Ontologies can be used as building block components of knowledge bases, object schema for object-oriented systems, conceptual schema for data bases, structured glossaries for human collaborations, vocabularies for communication between agents, class definitions for conventional software system, etc.” (Fikes) What are Ontologies good for?

4. “Agents operate independently and anticipate user needs” (P. Maes) “Agent help users suffering from information overload” (O. Etzioni) rather to mimic human intelligence “Agents are important because the allow users to interoperate with modern applications such as electronic commerce and information retrieval. Most of these applications assume that components are added dynamically and that they will be autonomous (serve different users and providers to fill different goals) and heterogeneous.” (M. Singh) “Essentially, agent-based architectures are characterized by three key features: autonomy, adaptation, and cooperation. Agent-based systems are computational systems in which several agents interact for their own good and for the good of the overall system. “In an agent-based architecture services are provided in the context of a community of loosely coupled agents of various types in a distributed environment.” “Agents are aware of their environment and capable of communicating with other agents that belong to the same agent community”. Key Ideas Agent-based Technologies

5. Service providers describe their capabilities in terms of a domain (or task) ontology Agents that seek services describe their needs in terms of a domain (or task) ontology Broker agents server as matchmakers between service providers and service seekers by finding suitable agents and by evaluating the extent to which they can provide those services relying on a semantic brokering approach. Various languages have been advocated in the recent years to specify ontologies: OKBC, CKML/OML, ONTOLINGUA, XML, UMLS, SNOMED, GALEN... Ontologies and Brokering

6. Specify keywords with respect to the documents they are looking for End User Agents Clinical Trial Report Service Provider Agents Abstract Clinical Trial Report Search Engine Summary Specify subset of ontology End User Agents Clinical Trial Report Service Provider Agents Subset of an Ontology Semantic Brokering Summary A “Traditional” Approach Semantic Brokering Approach := matchmaking

7. Patient Intensive-Care- Patient Age>40 weight Hours-in-intensive-care Patient Intensive-Care- Patient Age<15 Patient Intensive-Care- Patient age weight Patient Intensive-Care- Patient Age>60 Weight>300 Data Analyst’s Information Requirement Data Collection1Data Collection2 Data Collection3 Hours-in-intensive-care Result Semantic Brokering: ((DataCollection1 nil ((missing slot weight) (contradictory ( age 40)) (DataCollection2 t) (DataCollection3 t ((> age 60)(> weight 300))) Example Semantic Brokering

8. Scientific communities have to agree on ontologies; otherwise, the whole approach is flawed. Development of ontologies for a particular domain is a difficult task (see Digital Anatomist project at UW, development of UMLS). The development of user friendly, and intelligent knowledge acquisition tools is very important for the successful development of shared ontologies. Expressiveness of languages that are used to define ontologies limits what can be done with domain ontologies. Reasoning capabilities are important for systems that use shared ontologies (we need a language to specify ontologies and an inference engine that can reason with the given ontologies) –finding inconsistencies in knowledge bases, for finding errors at data entry –semantic brokering –more intelligent mappings between terms –... Critical Problems with Respect to Shared Ontologies

9. References WWW-Links: –http://ksl-web.stanford.edu/Reusable-ontol/P001.html (Richard Fikes’ (Stanford University) Slide Show on “Reusable Ontologies” –http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~softagents/ (CMU Intelligent Software Agents Page) Papers: –Special Issue IEEE Intelligent Systems on “Coming to Terms with Ontologies”, Jan./Feb. 1999.