1. Introduction of TRIZ History of TRIZ Contradiction Su-Field Analysis
ARIZ
Technology Evolution
Trimming
Case Study
Knowledgist ver. 2.5

2. History of TRIZ

3. 1940 First Invention (13-year-old)
History of TRIZ
October
1940 First Invention (13-year-old)
1946 Military serves in Patent department
1946 Start of TRIZ development (20yr)
1949 Two Grand Prix in inventors
competition (23yr), Letter to Stalin, Arrest
1956 Freedom, first publication in journal
1958 Journalist and Science Fiction
1961 First book about TRIZ
1971 Lecture at University in Baku
1974 Publication Abroad (Japan)
1981 More than 300 school in USSR
TRIZCON held & AI established in USA

4. 1946 ~ 1960, Altshuller researched “Contradiction”
Problem
Solutions
called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Overcoming
Contradiction
Breakthrough
The typical engineering approach is to compromise, but that approach does not lead to an invention. An Invention overcomes the contradiction.

5. 1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction” Problem Solutions called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Removal of
Contradiction
Breakthrough

6. Analysis and Classification about
Contradiction
1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Problem Solutions
called “Inventive”
(Level 3 and 4)
Removal of
Contradiction
Breakthrough
Analysis and Classification about
the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Technical
Contradiction
40 Principles
Two Kinds of
Contradiction
Physical
Contradiction
Separation Principles

7. Airplane : Speed , Weight . Two Kinds of Contradiction
Technical
Contradiction
(Generally, as soon as an engineer solve one problem,
another unexpected harmful results happen)
Airplane : Speed , Weight .
Two Kinds of
Contradiction
(by the powerful engine) (by the larger weight of engine)
Chemical : Speed , Quality .
reaction
(by temperature increase) (undesired reaction also starts)
Physical
Contradiction
(Generally, by one reason, an engineer must choose an
action. But simultaneously an engineer must choose
count-action by another reason )
Airplane : Landing Wheels
must Exist, must not Exist.
(for landing on earth)
(for an air resistance at flying)
Bicycle : Chain must be
Rigid and Flexible.
(to transfer big force)
(for circular movement)

8. Separation Principles
Contradiction
1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Physical
Contradiction
Separation Principles
Analysis and Classification about
the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Separation in TIME
Separation in SPACE
Separation in SCALE .

9. Separation Principles
Contradiction
1946 ~ 1960 : “Contradiction”
Physical
Contradiction
Separation Principles
Separation in TIME
Separation in SPACE
Separation in SCALE .

10. Contradiction
1946 ~ 1960, “Contradiction”
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at overcoming Contradiction
Technical
Contradiction
40 Principles
divide an object into independent parts
make an object easy to disassemble
increase the degree of fragmentation (or segmentation) of an object
1 Segmentation
2 Separation …
35 Parameter change
36 Phase transitions
40 Composite materials
separate an 'interfering' part (or property) from an object,
or single out the only necessary part (or property) of an object
change an object`s physical state (e.g. to a gas, liquid, or solid),
change the concentration or consistency,
change the degree of flexibility,
change the temperature.
use phenomena occurring during phase transitions
(e.g. volume changes, loss or absorption of heat, etc.).
change from uniform to composite (multiple) materials

11. Is there any method to use 40 principles with easy ?
Contradiction
Is there any method to use 40 principles with easy ?
Altshuller made standard vocabulary at engineering field as
39 Engineering Parameters.

12. Contradiction
Recommended principles by Altshuller ; usually 3 or 4 principles among 40 principles

13. 1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource”
Su-Field Analysis
1956 ~ 1970, Altshuller researched “Resource”
In every technological system, one can discern two objects or substances, S1 and S2.
[ex : two parts of system
the system itself and its product
the system and its environment]
These substances interact or communicate through a field, F.
[ex : Mechanical
Acoustic
Thermal
Chemical
Electric
Magnetic etc]
The relationship between the field and
the two substances can be expressed
in a Su-Field triangle.
This triangle diagram may be thought of
the technological system.
It is of course a very simple, abstract model.
More detailed models can be made
by adding more nodes,
linking triangles together, etc.

14. 1956 ~ 1970 : Resource Su-Field Analysis
These diagram can be made more informative by introducing different line symbols
for the connections between nodes.
If a Su-Field diagram contains dashed or wavy lines, then the system it represents
needs improvement ie, an inventive problem.
The solution to this inventive problem may also be presented by a Su-Field diagram,
which would be a modification of the original diagram.

15. Su-Field Analysis
1956 ~ 1970 : Resource
Analysis and Classification about the Principles used at more than one million patents
76 Standard Solutions
Initial Problem Situation is described as graphic method
The recommended solution by Altshuller for each specific situation is also described as graphic method
described as graphic method called Su-Field Diagram

16. 1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving Process
ARIZ
1970 ~ 1985, he researched Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
ARIZ Education at SAMSUNG by TRIZ Master Nikolai Khomenko

17. 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
ARIZ
1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 1. Analyzing the Problem
1.1. formulate the mini-problem
1.2. define the conflicting elements
1.3. describe graphic models for technical contradiction
1.4. select a graphic model for further analysis
1.5. intensify the conflict
1.6. describe the problem model
1.7. apply the inventive standards
Step 2. Analyzing the Problem Model
2.1. define the operational zone (oz)
2.2. define the operational time (ot)
2.3. define the substance-field resources (sfr)

18. 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
ARIZ
1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 3. Defining Ideal Final Result (IFR) and Physical Contradiction (PhC)
3.1. formulate IFR-1
3.2. intensify definition of IFR-1
3.3. Identify the physical contradiction for the macro-level
3.4. Identify the physical contradiction for the micro-level
3.5. formulate IFR-2
3.6. apply the inventive standards to resolved physical contradiction
Step 4. Mobilizing and Utilizing of Substance-Field Resources (SFR)
4.1. simulation with little creatures
4.2. to take a"step back" from IFR
4.3. using combination of substance resources
4.4. using "void"
4.5. using derived resources
4.6. using an electrical field
4.7. using a field and field-sensitive substance

19. 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
ARIZ
1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 5. Apply the Knowledge Base
5.1. applying the system of standard solutions for inventive problems
5.2. applying the problem-analogous
5.3. applying the principles for resolving the physical contradictions
5.4. applying the pointer to physical effects and phenomena
Step 6. Changing or Substituting the Problem
6.1. transition to the technical solution
6.2. checking the problem formulation for combination of several problems
6.3. changing the problem
6.4. reformulation of mini-problem

20. 1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
ARIZ
1970 ~ 1985 : Problem Solving Process
Attention!
ARIZ is a complicated tool. Do not apply it to solve new practical problems
without at least for 80 academic hours of preliminary study.
Step 7. Analyzing the Method of Resolving the Physical Contradiction
7.1 checking the concept of solution
7.2. preliminary estimation of the solution concept
7.3. checking the priority of the solution through patent funds
7.4. estimation of sub-problems to implement obtained solution concept
Step 8. Applying The Obtained Solution
8.1. estimate of changes for super-system
8.2. find new application for obtained solution
8.3. apply solution concept for other problems
Step 9. Analyzing the Problem Solving Process
9.1. compare proposed process and real
9.2. compare obtained solution concept and knowledge from TRIZ

21. Technology
Evolution

22. History of TRIZ Contradiction Su-Field Analysis ARIZ
Technology Evolution
Trimming
Case Study
Knowledgist ver. 2.5
These three part is done separated material.