1. 1 Mid Day Meal Scheme Ministry of HRD Government of India MDM-PAB Meeting – GUJARAT On 23.04.2009

2. Review of Implementation of MDMS in Gujarat (Primary + Upper Primary) (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008) Part-I Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 2

3. Questions?  What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of no. of meal served?  What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on 31.03.08 as well as 31.12.08?  How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?  What is the level of lifting?  How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?  How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?  How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served? …… contd Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 3

4. Contd ….., Questions?  How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?  What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices? Part –II  What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?  How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data? Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 4

5. Benchmarks  Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)  Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)  Lifting of foodgrains [1.4.08 to 31.12.08]: 85% (+ or – 10%)  Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [1.4.08 to 31.12.08]: 66% (+ or – 10%)  Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.  Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.  State’s AWP&B is in accordance with MHRD’s guidelines.  Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 5

6. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal i n Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Meal (in Crore) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 6

7. Non-Coverage Institutions (State Level) 7 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. 8 Non-Coverage Institutions District-wise : Primary No.DistrictsNo. of Institutions No. of Institutions serving MDM Non-Coverage%NC PRIAMRY 1Jamnagar143613231138% 2Rajkot14671406614% Upper Primary 1Sabarkantha2510168982133% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of children (In Lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 9

10. 10 Non-Coverage : Children (Primary) No.Districts No. of children as per PAB Approval Average no. of children availing MDM Non- Coverage %NC 1Porbandar33,04119,638 -13403-41% 2Panchmahals2,50,3892,04,468 -45921-18% 3Valsad92,81677,556 -15260-16% 4Bharuch96,38680,861 -15525-16% 5Vadodara2,43,5112,05,228 -38283-16% 6Navsari69,89460,587 -9307-13% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. 11 Non-Coverage : Children (Upper Primary) No.Districts No. of children as per PAB Approval Average no. of children availing MDM Non- Coverage %NC 1Porbandar 164906456 -10034-61% 2Vadodara 6374655362 -8384-13% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days i n Q1+Q2+Q3) No. of Working days Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 5% More 12

13. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *Including Opening Balance of 2667.84 MTs as on 01.04.08 13

14. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 14 *Including Opening Balance of 2667.84 MTs as on 01.04.08

15. Negative Unspent Balance of foodgrains 15  Districts : Negative unspent balance of foodgrains as on 31.12.2008 1.Gandhinagar (-23%) 2.Mehsana (-17%) 3.Navsari (-5%) 4.Sabarkantha (-5%) 5.Surendranagar (-2%)

16. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Foodgrains (in MTs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 16

17. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Focus districts: - Below 65% :- Mehsana (45%), Gandhinagar (49%) & Porbandar (50%) etc. Above 80% :- Bhavnagar (97%), Rojkot (89%) & Jamnagar (85%) 17

18. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) % Utilisation Benchmark of Utilization : 66% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 0.98 Lakhs MTs 0.71 Lakhs MTs 0.61 Lakhs MTs 18

19. Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 19 State level utilisation : 62% Focus Districts :- Below 55% : Porbandar (33%) Above 70% : Bhavnagar (82%), Jamnagar & Gandhinagar(73%) etc.

20. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008) Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.) Benchmark Utilisation: 66% Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 20

21. Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Focus Districts: Below 20% :- Porbandar(17%) Above 31% :- Ghandinagar (37%), Narmda(33%), Junagadh(32%) etc. 21

22. Mismatch between Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking Cost Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 22

23. Mismatch between Utilisation of Foodgrains and Cooking Cost Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 23 Districts : - Excess utilisation of foodgrains

24. Reconciliation of Foodgrains utilisation 24 Deficit consumption of foodgrains Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Sr. No.District No. of Meals served during 01.4.08 to 31.12.08 Expected consumption of food grains (in MTs) Actual consumption of food grains (in MTs) Deficit Consumption in % 1Valsad1.6 Cr.1826.371559.97-15% 2Banaskantha4.5 Cr.4938.374234.22-14% 3Anand2.7 Cr.3011.772646.14-12% 4Surendranagar1.8 Cr.2009.431769.44-12% 5Ahemedabad4.1 Cr.4675.994123.03-12%

25. MME Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 25

26. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08) Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 26 Transportation expenditure not provided by the State

27. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 27

28. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices) Progress (in %) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 28

29. Performance Score card – A Summary Sl. No. ComponentAchievementBenchmark 1. Foodgrains Lifting 72%85% 2. Foodgrains Utilisation 62%66% 3. Cooking Cost Utilisation 29%66% 4. MME Utilisation 0%100% 5. Transport Utilisation 0%72% 6. Kitchen Shed construction 26%100% 7. Kitchen Devices procurement 77%100% 8. QPRs received 2 nos.3 nos. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 29

30. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10 Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 30

31. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 31 (32% Less) (34% Less)

32. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India (0.2% More) 32

33. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 33 (11% less) (40% less) (12% less) (43% less) 2009-10

34. SSA Vs MDM Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India *:SSA= Govt+LB+GA 34

35. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY) No. of children (in lakhs) Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 35

36. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India Sl. NoYear As per DISE Data As per MDM Sanctions 1.2006-07209 211 2.2007-08210 212 3.2008-09Not available214 4.2009-10Not available 220 (State’s claim for 2009-10) 36

37. Thank You Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India 37