Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012

2 2 Goal of Programme: T To improve quality of Technical Education and enhance existing capacities of the Institutions to become dynamic, demand-driven, quality conscious, efficient and forward looking, responsive to rapid economic and technological developments occurring at the local, State, National and International levels. It has a clear focus on the objectives to improve the overall quality of existing Engineering Education.

3 3 CONCERNS of the project :  Acute Faculty shortage  Poor Industry-academia collaboration  Obsolete learning infrastructure  Lack of research culture  Poor employability of graduates

4 4 Factors to gauge the success- S.N o Particulars End of TEQIP-I End of TEQIP-II 1 Academically autonomous institutions 11 16 2UG Placement rate76% 95% 3UG start salary (annually)2.8 lakh 5.0 lakh 4 Internationally published research papers Appro. 250 1000 5PG graduates Appro. 1500 5000 6Ph.D produced 112500 7Share of programs accredited 93% 100%

5 5  No. of Patents obtained and filed;  No. of integrated PhD programmes introduced;  Joint research projects undertaken;  Consultancies in collaboration with industry;  Publications, joint conferences, workshops;  Campus wide networking established in all institutions. Other factors to gauge the success-

6 6 PROJECT STRATEGY :  The Project is designed to bridge the gap in the quality of engineering education between premier institutions & other institutions.  To enable institutions to implement academic and non- academic reforms to achieve the institutional goals.  To impart pedagogical training to all the faculty from Project Institution and also to the faculty from desirous non Project Institutions for effective teaching.  Promote world-class research in emerging areas in Project Institutions.

7 7 Key Activities to be undertaken: Starting new PG programmes in Engineering disciplines Strengthening of laboratories and establishment of new laboratories and virtual labs Modernization of classrooms and virtual classrooms Updatation of learning resources Modernization and strengthening of libraries so as to convert it in to knowledge centre

8 8 Contd…  Providing Teaching and Research Assistantships to existing and new PG programmes in Engineering  Enhancement of R&D and institutional consultancy  Faculty and Staff development for improved competence based on TNA  Enhanced interaction with Industry  Pedagogical Training  Implementation of institutional reforms  Academic support for weak students

9 Expectation from Project Institutes  Obtaining autonomous institution status within 2 years and ensure quality driven utilization of such status  Accreditation of eligible UG+PG programmes  Minimum 4 Board meetings per year  Improved faculty qualifications  Improvements in placement rate and average salary of placement package  Increased transition of weak students from first to second year  Increase in the overall student and faculty satisfaction 9

10  Initiation of Technology driven activities such as creating virtual labs and CoEs  Increased number of Masters and Doctoral students enrolled  Increased number of externally funded R&D and consultancy projects  Increase in the number of publications in refereed journals  Increased collaboration with institutions and industry  Implementation of Governing reforms Contd… 10

11 Immediate Expectations  NBA accreditation for 50% of eligible UG and PG programmes by September-12  20% increase in faculty with masters degree over the baseline by September-12  10% increase in faculty with Ph.D over the baseline by September- 12  Establishing Finishing School for academically weak students by September-12  60% expenditure of total allocation on procurements of goods by March- 13  Assistance to at least 15 M.Tech students by March-13  Assistance to at least 5 Ph.D students by March-13  Training to minimum of 20 faculties by March-13  Training to minimum of 30 Technical staff by March-13  Minimum 2 R & D projects by March-13

12 Performance of Institutes Sr. No. Parameter Sub Componant- 1.1 CoEKCoEJCoECSPCE BVU CoE SCoE 1 Leadership of Institute and its involvement in the Project BBBBBB 2 Leadership of the TEQIP Coordinator BBBCBB 3 Clarity of amongst all Nodal Officers BBBBBB 4TEQIP Project office available CCCCCC 5Faculty attendance BBBAAA 6Faculty involvement CBBCBB 7Quality of queries from faculty BBBCBB 8Willingness and readiness for faculty/staff training center CCBCAC 12

13 Performance of Institutes Sr. No Parameter Sub Componant- 1.2 CoEP CoEA bd CoE Amrv ICTVJTI SGGS N WCEBATU GHR CoE RIT 1 Leadership of Institute and its involvement in the Project ABBABAABBB 2 Leadership of the TEQIP Coordinator ACCABABCBB 3 Clarity of amongst all Nodal Officers BBBBBBBBBB 4TEQIP Project office available AACBAABCAB 5Faculty attendance BBCCCCCCCA 6Faculty involvement BCCBCCBCBB 7Quality of queries from faculty BCCBCBBBCB 8Willingness and readiness for faculty/staff training center BCCBCBCBCA 13

14 EQUITY ACTION PLAN Equity Action Plan is the approach that consists of using extra and different measures to bring equality among the students, staff, faculty etc  Equity under the project is achieved when each student/faculty gains the requisite skills and knowledge needed to access meaningful opportunities.  Benefit the academically weaker students by taking remedial classes, tutorials, demonstration on communication, skill development and curricular development etc to bring these students to required level of proficiency. 14

15  To make campuses physically and socially gender friendly; especially by providing adequate and suitable facilities to women students and faculty.  To ensure adherence of Equity Action Plan scrupulously and transparently.  Spend a minimum of 4% of the allocation under Sub- component-1.1 to academic support to weak students. Contd… 15

16 16 DISCLOSURE MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK AND ITS OBJECTIVE  Disclosure Management means making known all information related to Project through website.  Disclosure Management Framework (DMF) policy will ensure transparency and accountability in project implementation and its achievements.  Adherence to DMF is mandatory in TEQIP II.

17 WHY AN ORGANIZATION REQUIRES A GOOD M&E SYSTEM WHY AN ORGANIZATION REQUIRES A GOOD M&E SYSTEM  To provide information to managers and stakeholders on the extent to which the project is meeting the desired objectives  To provide regular feedback on the status of the project and a clearer basis for decision-making  To guide the evolution of the system in the future based on lessons learnt from the current system MONITORING & EVALUATION (M & E) 17

18 18 POLICY FOR PROCUREMENT 18  Transparency  Fairness  Fraud Prevention  Equal opportunity to all eligible bidders  Economy and Efficiency  Effectiveness

19 All institutes are supposed to follow the fund allocation guidelines as per the PIP. Disagreements observed by NPIU in the procurement plans are summarized as follows-  Software Packages are to be procured under LRs only.  Proprietary items and items under DGS & D shall be marked clearly.  Similar type/ common items from various departments shall be combined so as to minimize the number of packages  Procurement of safety/ surveillance systems are not permitted  Brand name of the items are to be strictly avoided  Consultant services shall be hired only for specialized activities and not for basic requirements. Observations of NPIU regarding Procurement Plans

20 PROCUREMENT PLAN 20 The procurement plan duration is 1 st April 2011 to 31 st march 2014. REVISION OF APPROVED PROCUREMENT PLAN Revision ThresholdReviewing AuthorityApproving Authority >= 10%Institution Director/ Head of Institution 30% Director/ Head of Institution SPFU >= 30%SPFUNPIU

21 THANK YOU 21


Download ppt "Review Workshop - TEQIP-II Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad Date- 24 th August 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google