Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

May 21, 2013 Lina Xu 1. 2 1. Methods to model Mortality Improvement 2. Lee Carter Model 3. Model fit/Analysis/Result 4. Industry Mortality Improvement.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "May 21, 2013 Lina Xu 1. 2 1. Methods to model Mortality Improvement 2. Lee Carter Model 3. Model fit/Analysis/Result 4. Industry Mortality Improvement."— Presentation transcript:

1 May 21, 2013 Lina Xu 1

2 2 1. Methods to model Mortality Improvement 2. Lee Carter Model 3. Model fit/Analysis/Result 4. Industry Mortality Improvement Study 5. Conclusion Overview

3 1. SOA 2. CMIB 3. Other Actuarial Method 4. Lee-Carter MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study 3

4 SOA Methods –Formula This method will have a base rate q 1994 and the reduction factor AA x for each age x. SOA Group Annuity Valuation Table Task Force GAR94 Tables AA x was obtained:  1. Data Source CSRS for age 25-65 for 1987-93 add SSA for age 1-24 and 60-120 for 1977-93  2. Average Trends Linear Regression of log(m x,t ) 5-year age group for data CSRS and SSA for1987-1993 and 1977-1993 respectively 4 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

5 CMIB Methods –Formula RF(x,t) - Exponential Decay Characterized by two age-dependent parameters. α(x) denotes the value to be asymptotically approached when t ends to infinite, while f n is the percentage of the total fall (1- α(x)) assumed to occur in n years. Two set of tables 80 and 92 series (1979-82 and 1991-94 experiences, respectively) for annuitants and pensioners.  1. 80 Series - n was fixed at value of 20 and f 20 at 0.6 for all ages. And α(x) is expressed as:  5 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

6 CMIB Methods –Formula  2. “92” Series - n remained fixed at 20 but f 20 values linearly from 0.45 to 0.71 between ages 60 to 110, below 60 and above 110, constant values with the values already mentioned apply. And α(x) and fn are expressed as the following: 6 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

7 Other Actuarial Method  Specifications 1. Define Factor 2. Determine “standard” rate for trend a)Ratio of the mortality to the previous year’s mortality b)Most Recent Mortality Rate c)Mean 3. Methods a)Arithmetic average b)Mean c)Geometric average d)Weighted average 7 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

8 1. Data Source 2. Lee-Carter Model 3. Model Analysis 8 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

9 HMD: Human Mortality Database is a population data that it is administrated by UC Berkley US population data from HMD period 1933 – 2006 is used to demonstrate Lee-Carter Method. 9 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

10 Lee-Carter’s Extrapolating Method 1. Project age pattern and to measure uncertainty 2. SVD to Solve the age-specific parameters as well as the preliminary mortality index 3. ARIMA (0,1,0) a random walk with a drift to project mortality index 10 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

11 General Model (1) Where, is the central mortality rate for age x for year t; a x and b x are parameters dependent only on age x; k t is factor to be modeled as a time series; and the error term, is assumed to have mean zero and standard deviation. 11 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

12 Re-Write Model as (2) Where, is the general shape across age of the mortality schedule; the b x profile tells us which rates decline rapidly and which rates decline slowly in response to changes in k t ( ) 12 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

13 The model (1) cannot be fitted by simple regression methods; It allows for several solutions. To deal the above, Use SVD, and b x and k t is normalized to sum to unity and to zero respectively. 13 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

14  SVD Let A be order nxm, then there are unitary matrices U and V, of order n and m respectively, such that, where F is a rectangular diagonal matrix of order mxn,   With F ii = µ i. The numbers µ i are called the singular values of A. They are all real and positive, and they can be arranged so that  Where r is the rank of the matrix.  V* is a conjugate transpose. 14 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

15 SVD applied to ln(m x,t ), (3) Or (4) Note that, V (and also U) is real number, so the conjugate transpose V* is equal to the transpose V’. 15 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

16 Singular values – US 1933-2006 The first singular value is larger 16 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

17 Use the first singular value component (5) The portion of the total temporal variances explained by the first SV component is all over 99%, that seemed captured important of data. The second singular value didn’t seemed add much value. 17 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

18 18 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

19 SVD to Solve {a x }, {b x } and {k t }, (6) (7) 19 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

20 Fitted Values of {a x } and {b x } for 1933-2006 from equation (7) above, 20 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

21 A second stage of estimation of k t, whereby the k t ’s are recalculated from the equation, (8) Taking the estimated {a x } and {b x } as fixed from equation (7). Note that: there is no closed form solution for equation (8) above. ( Newton method is employed ) 21 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

22 Take an initial k t1 equation along with {a x } and {b x } from equation (7) above, the following vector is employed for the Newton’s method to obtained the 2 nd stage k Re-write the equation (8) above, (9) The Jacobian matrix for equation (9) is, The first order Taylor series becomes: (10) 22 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

23 After iterated equation (10) to find solution k t for equation (8). ARIMA(0,1,0) time series model that a random walk with drift is found to be a good fit, for the mortality index k t, That is, (11) 23 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

24 From the k t formula (11), Summing up the above, 24 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

25 the projection of the k t into the i years from the current year t, (12)  Equation (12) implies, the quantity for the error term is, 25 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

26 26 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

27 27 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

28  The error Term Analysis  Recall that the error is assumed to follow a normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation. The should not be too much different across ages. 28 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

29 29 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

30 30 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

31 31 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

32 32 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

33 33 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

34 Singular values The first singular value is larger for all three countries (Japan, Taiwan, and US) 34 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

35 Use the first singular value component (5) The portion of the total temporal variances explained by the first SV component is all over 99%, that seemed captured important of data. 35 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

36 36 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

37 37 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

38 38 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

39  Korean has the highest improvement however the mortality rates are mostly higher than other regions for most ages;  US mortality has the lowest improvement. 39 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

40 a. Leading Cause of Death b. Mortality Trend for cause of death Data c. Mortality Rates change by calendar year, type of underwriting, age, sex, Cause of Death etc. 40 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

41 a. Japan: mortality and % of the number of deaths by cause were provided by age, sex, and type of underwriting for each year from 2001 to 05. The mortality and the number of death for leading cause of death by sex and type of underwriting for years from 1992 to 2005. b. Korea: Mortality Rates by age for leading cause of day by age and sex; and the mortality for study period c. Taiwan: mortality by sex and medical examination from year 1982 to 2000. 41 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

42 Leading Cause of Death and the additional Data Used in this analysis 42 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

43 Leading Cause of Death 43 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

44 Number of Death Age distribution 44 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

45 45 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

46 Leading Cause of Death 46 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

47 Number of Death Age Distribution 47 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

48 Taiwanese 5 leading Cause of Death 48 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

49 49 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

50 50 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

51 51 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

52 52 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

53 53 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

54 54 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

55 55 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

56 Improvement/Deteriorate (+/-) Percent 56 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

57 Improvement comparison to Population: 57 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

58 Korea EMT Improvement Factor 58 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

59 59 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

60 60 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

61 Compare Industry Improvement to Population *Population result is for Age 20-69 61 MethodsLee-Carter Model Model fit/Analysis/ResultIndustry Trend Study

62 1. Lee-Carter Method modeled the uncertainty of the reduction factor while other methods didn’t; 2. The reduction factor is vary by age and sex; 3. The reduction factor is also vary by projection year; 4. The reduction factor vary by region; 5. The industry mortality improvement is usually smaller than the population’s improvement. 62

63 63


Download ppt "May 21, 2013 Lina Xu 1. 2 1. Methods to model Mortality Improvement 2. Lee Carter Model 3. Model fit/Analysis/Result 4. Industry Mortality Improvement."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google