Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Carolyn Sullins, Ph.D. Ladel Lewis, Ph.D. candidate The Kercher Center for Social Research Western Michigan University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Carolyn Sullins, Ph.D. Ladel Lewis, Ph.D. candidate The Kercher Center for Social Research Western Michigan University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Carolyn Sullins, Ph.D. Ladel Lewis, Ph.D. candidate The Kercher Center for Social Research Western Michigan University

2  Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children and Their Families Program: “Systems of care.”  incorporates a broad, flexible array of effective services and supports for a defined, multi-system population that is organized into a coordinated network… is culturally and linguistically competent, builds meaningful partnerships with families and youth at service delivery, management and policy levels, and has supportive policy and management infrastructure. (Pires, Lazear, & Conlan, 2008).

3  144 sites have been or are in the process of being evaluated. Each 1-2 year cohort: +/- 30 sites.  Each SoC has distinct:  geographic location and scope (e.g., statewide, county wide, city-wide, tribal)  Ages of the youth served  Mental health issues facing the targeted youth  Racial, ethnic, and cultural factors

4  Child c e ntered and family driven  Community based  Culturally competent

5  Presenting issues of the youth  Youth’s level of functioning (strengths and weaknesses)  Family strengths and barriers  Types of services family and youth are receiving  Satisfaction with services  Cultural competence of services  Youth and family input into services

6  “One size fits all” battery of questions  HSIRB mandates re language on consent forms  Ensuring an adequate sample size  Ensuring retention in a mobile population

7  History of racist abuse by researchers (E.g., Tuskegee syphilis study)  Misinterpretation of data, or no access to results  Sensitive or stigmatized topics even more difficult  Families overwhelmed or embarrassed

8 Caucasian: 49.1% (including White Latino/a: < 5%) African-American/Multiracial: 50.9% Ages 7-17 Diagnosed with a Severe Emotional Disturbance

9  Informed consent  Voluntary participation  Confidentiality and its exceptions

10 Parents, various social service workers, eval staff  Reviewed consent forms for clarity  Gave opinions to HSIRB re child abuse reporting  Parent input re: communication among clinicians, families, and interviewers  Interpretation of data  Reporting of results

11  We came to their group  Help re local language  Helped us make it more comfortable for participants  Info that later helped us interpret data

12 Does confidentiality mean…  No interviews in public places, even if that’s what participants request?  Kicking Grandma out of the room?  Pretending you don’t see participant in public?

13  Some found it emotionally draining  Too long and redundant  Questionnaires with overlapping questions  Categories of services – national vs. local terms  Keeping in touch with families every 6 months

14  “Evaluating System of Care – not you”  Yet up front about sensitive, personal questions  Non-judgmental attitude for better rapport, retention, AND accuracy.  Balance – we can’t act as friends or counselors!  If SoC not working, or not working with all groups of people, we need to know.

15  Offer breaks, gum, stress balls, etc. to participants  Coloring books, DVDs for young kids  Redundant questions from multiple surveys: propriety and accuracy trump methodological “letter of law.”

16  Family address tracking form  Birthday and holiday cards with coupons  Incentives for families to contact us  Annual dinner as a “thank you”  Results in bimonthly newsletter, website, and other venues

17

18 Chi Square (1, N=224) =.466, p =.495

19 Chi Square= (1, N= 145) =.665, p =.415

20 Chi Square= (1, N=119) =.511, p =.561

21 Chi Square= (1, N=91) =.071, p =.834

22 Chi Square= (1, N=52) = 1.055, p =.402

23  Fulfilling national evaluation requirements within a local context is a constant balancing act.  With enough input from local stakeholders at each stage, it can be achieved!

24  Please contact carolyn.sullins@wmich.edu carolyn.sullins@wmich.edu  Or Ladel_lewis@yahoo.comLadel_lewis@yahoo.com  For more info, please see also  http://www.wmich.edu/sociology /kzoowraps.html http://www.wmich.edu/sociology /kzoowraps.html


Download ppt "Carolyn Sullins, Ph.D. Ladel Lewis, Ph.D. candidate The Kercher Center for Social Research Western Michigan University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google