1. Statistics allow biologists to support the findings of their experiments.

2. “Why is this Biology?” Variation in populations. Variability in results. affects Confidence in conclusions. The key methodology in Biology is hypothesis testing through experimentation. Carefully-designed and controlled experiments and surveys give us quantitative (numeric) data that can be compared. We can use the data collected to test our hypothesis and form explanations of the processes involved… but only if we can be confident in our results. We therefore need to be able to evaluate the reliability of a set of data and the significance of any differences we have found in the data. Image: 'Transverse section of part of a stem of a Dead-nettle (Lamium sp.) showing+a+vascular+bundle+and+part+of+the+cortex' http://www.flickr.com/photos/71183136@N08/6959590092http://www.flickr.com/photos/71183136@N08/6959590092 Found on flickrcc.net

3. “Which medicine should I prescribe?” Image from: http://www.msf.org/international-activity-report-2010-sierra-leonehttp://www.msf.org/international-activity-report-2010-sierra-leone Donate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good: http://i-biology.net/about/biology4good/http://i-biology.net/about/biology4good/

4. “Which medicine should I prescribe?” Image from: http://www.msf.org/international-activity-report-2010-sierra-leonehttp://www.msf.org/international-activity-report-2010-sierra-leone Donate to Medecins Sans Friontiers through Biology4Good: http://i-biology.net/about/biology4good/http://i-biology.net/about/biology4good/ Generic drugs are out-of-patent, and are much cheaper than the proprietary (brand-name) equivalents. Doctors need to balance needs with available resources. Which would you choose?

5. Hummingbirds are nectarivores (herbivores that feed on the nectar of some species of flower). In return for food, they pollinate the flower. This is an example of mutualism – benefit for all. As a result of natural selection, hummingbird bills have evolved. Birds with a bill best suited to their preferred food source have the greater chance of survival. Photo: Archilochus colubris, from wikimedia commons, by Dick Daniels.wikimedia commonsDick Daniels

6. Researchers studying comparative anatomy collect data on bill-length in two species of hummingbirds: Archilochus colubris (red-throated hummingbird) and Cynanthus latirostris (broadbilled hummingbird). To do this, they need to collect sufficient relevant, reliable data so they can test the Null hypothesis (H 0 ) that: “there is no significant difference in bill length between the two species.” Photo: Archilochus colubris (male), wikimedia commons, by Joe Schneidwikimedia commons

7. The Null hypothesis presumes that there is NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE between the two samples. The ALTERNATIVE hypothesis presumes that there is a STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE between the two samples. The t-test provides a probability that the two samples are the same. A P < 0.05 is accepted as a low enough probability of sameness to reject the NULL hypothesis.

8. The sample size must be large enough to provide sufficient reliable data and for us to carry out relevant statistical tests for significance. We must also be mindful of uncertainty in our measuring tools and error in our results. Photo: Broadbilled hummingbird (wikimedia commons).wikimedia commons

10. The mean is a measure of the central tendency of a set of data. Table 1: Raw measurements of bill length in A. colubris and C. latirostris. Bill length (±0.1mm) nA. colubrisC. latirostris 113.017.0 214.018.0 315.018.0 415.018.0 515.019.0 616.019.0 716.019.0 818.020.0 918.020.0 1019.020.0 Mean s Calculate the mean using: Your calculator (sum of values / n) Excel =AVERAGE(highlight raw data) n = sample size. The bigger the better. In this case n=10 for each group. All values should be centred in the cell, with decimal places consistent with the measuring tool uncertainty.

13. Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data. Table 1: Raw measurements of bill length in A. colubris and C. latirostris. Bill length (±0.1mm) nA. colubrisC. latirostris 113.017.0 214.018.0 315.018.0 415.018.0 515.019.0 616.019.0 716.019.0 818.020.0 918.020.0 1019.020.0 Mean 15.918.8 s 1.911.03 Standard deviation can have one more decimal place. =STDEV (highlight RAW data). Which of the two sets of data has: a.The longest mean bill length? a.The greatest variability in the data?

14. Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data. Table 1: Raw measurements of bill length in A. colubris and C. latirostris. Bill length (±0.1mm) nA. colubrisC. latirostris 113.017.0 214.018.0 315.018.0 415.018.0 515.019.0 616.019.0 716.019.0 818.020.0 918.020.0 1019.020.0 Mean 15.918.8 s 1.911.03 Standard deviation can have one more decimal place. =STDEV (highlight RAW data). Which of the two sets of data has: a.The longest mean bill length? a.The greatest variability in the data? C. latirostris A. colubris

15. Standard deviation is a measure of the spread of most of the data. Error bars are a graphical representation of the variability of data. Which of the two sets of data has: a.The highest mean? a.The greatest variability in the data? A B Error bars could represent standard deviation, range or confidence intervals.

16. The overlap of a set of error bars gives a clue as to the significance of the difference between two sets of data. Large overlap No overlap Lots of shared data points within each data set. Results are not likely to be significantly different from each other. Any difference is most likely due to chance. No (or very few) shared data points within each data set. Results are more likely to be significantly different from each other. The difference is more likely to be ‘real’.

20. Our results show a very small overlap between the two sets of data. So how do we know if the difference is significant or not? We need to use a statistical test. The t-test is a statistical test that helps us determine the significance of the difference between the means of two sets of data.

22. The Null Hypothesis (H 0 ): “There is no significant difference.” This is the ‘default’ hypothesis that we always test. In our conclusion, we either accept the null hypothesis or reject it. A t-test can be used to test whether the difference between two means is significant. If we accept H 0, then the means are not significantly different. If we reject H 0, then the means are significantly different. Remember: We are never ‘trying’ to get a difference. We design carefully-controlled experiments and then analyse the results using statistical analysis.

23. Excel can jump straight to a value of P for our results. One function (=ttest) compares both sets of data. As it calculates P directly (the probability that the difference is due to chance), we can determine significance directly. In this case, P=0.00051 This is much smaller than 0.005, so we are confident that we can: reject H 0. The difference is unlikely to be due to chance. Conclusion: There is a significant difference in bill length between A. colubris and C. latirostris.

24. Two tails: we assume data are normally distributed, with two ‘tails’ moving away from mean. Type 2 (unpaired): we are comparing one whole population with the other whole population. (Type 1 pairs the results of each individual in set A with the same individual in set B).

26. Cartoon from: http://www.xkcd.com/552/http://www.xkcd.com/552/ Correlation does not imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing "look over there."

30. Correlation does not imply causality. Pirates vs global warming, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warminghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warming

31. Correlation does not imply causality. Pirates vs global warming, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warminghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster#Pirates_and_global_warming Where correlations exist, we must then design solid scientific experiments to determine the cause of the relationship. Sometimes a correlation exist because of confounding variables – conditions that the correlated variables have in common but that do not directly affect each other. To be able to determine causality through experimentation we need: One clearly identified independent variable Carefully measured dependent variable(s) that can be attributed to change in the independent variable Strict control of all other variables that might have a measurable impact on the dependent variable. We need: sufficient relevant, repeatable and statistically significant data. Some known causal relationships: Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and global warming Atmospheric CO 2 concentrations and the rate of photosynthesis Temperature and enzyme activity

32. Flamenco Dancer, by Steve Corey http://www.flickr.com/photos/22016744@N06/7952552148