1. 1 Slides for Steve Griffin, NSF “ETANA and Digital Library Integration” by Edward A. Fox Oct. 3, 2009 fox@vt.edu http://fox.cs.vt.edu Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA

2. 2

3. 3 NSF ITR IIS-0325579 Managing complex information applications: An archaeology digital library CWRU & VT 2003-2006 Building upon the 5S DL Framework to Integrate Archaeological Information in the Near East

4. 4 5SGraph 5S Archaeology MetaModel ArchDL Expert ArchDL Designer Structure Sub-model ETANA-DL Union Services Descriptions Harvesting Mapping Searching Browsing … Scenario Sub-model VN Metadata Format ETANA-DL Metadata Format HD Metadata Format Mapping Tool Wrapper4VNWrapper4HD Inverted Files Services DB Index Browse Service Search Service Browse DB Other ETANA-DL Services Web Interface XOAI VN Catalog HD Catalog Union Catalog 5SGen Component Pool Browsing …

5. Set of Slides as Backup 5

6. 6

7. 7 ETANA-DL Archaeological DL Integrated DL –Heterogeneous data handling Applies and extends the OAI-PMH –Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Handling Design considerations –Componentized –Extensible –Portable

8. 8 ETANA-DL Architecture DigBase and DigKit Lahav Nimrin Umayri Hisban Megiddo Jalul New Sites DATABASEWRAPPERSDATABASEWRAPPERS ETANA-DL UNION CATALOG Search USERINTERFACEUSERINTERFACE Browse Recommend Note Personalize Review Visualizations Archaeology Specific Work in progress …

9. 9 Map courtesy: www.enchantedlearning.com Initial ETANA-DL Member Locations Virginia Tech Mississippi State University Vanderbilt University Canadian University College Walla Walla College Andrews University CWRU Willamette University

10. 10

11. 11

12. 12 Lahav Website

13. 13 Megiddo Opening Screen

14. 14 Locus Screen: Pictures View all

15. 15 Area Screen

16. 16

17. 17 ETANA-DL Approach Applying and extending Digital Library (DL) techniques to solve key problems: making primary data available, data preservation, and interoperability Modeling archaeological information systems using 5S to better understand the domain and design the system and the supporting services Rapidly prototyping DLs that handle heterogeneous archaeological data using componentized frameworks: –eliciting requirements –refining metamodel and union schema –modeling sites –mapping –harvesting –providing useful services

18. 18 ETANA-DL Website

19. 19 Marking – writing notes for a specific user Marking Items

20. 20 Marked Items Display Sender, Date, Object OAI ID Sender Comments Options: View Record, Add record to Items Of Interest, Re-mark item (Redirect), Unmark item (Remove item from list)

21. 21 Discussions Page Discussions about an object View/Post messages, create new threads

22. 22 Recommendations Items recommended on the basis of similar interests

23. 23 ETANA-DL Searching Service Search

24. 24 ETANA-DL Multi-dimensional Browsing 3 new sites 2 new types of artifacts

25. 25 ETANA-DL Visual Browsing Service Visual Browse By site

26. 26 Visual Browsing Nimrin: Topographical Drawings Full siteNorth west quadrant Square: N40/W20

27. 27 Visual Browsing Nimrin : Square information Square: N40/W20 Locus: 86 Loci layout

28. 28 Visual Browsing Nimrin : locus sheet

29. 29 Visual Browsing Bab edh-Dhra' Cemetery Pottery # 25

30. 30 Visual Browsing Bab edh-Dhra' Cemetery Pottery # 25

31. 5S Perspective The 5S (Societies, Scenarios, Spaces, Structures, Streams) Framework for DLs guides our development and implementation. 31

32. 32 ETANA Societies 1.Historic and pre-historic societies (being studied) 2.Archaeologists (in academic institutes, fieldwork settings, or local and national governmental bodies) 3.Project directors 4.Technical staff (consisting of photographers, technical illustrators, and their assistants) 5.Field staff (responsible for the actual work of excavation) 6.Camp staff (e.g., camp managers, registrars, tool stewards) 7.General public (e.g., educators, learners, citizens)

33. 33 ETANA Societies Social issues 1.Who owns the finds? 2.Where should they be preserved? 3.What nationality and ethnicity do they represent? 4.Who has publication rights? 5.What interactions took place between those at the site studied, and others? What theories are proposed by whom about this?

34. 34 ETANA Scenarios 1.Life in the site in former times 2.Digital recording: the planning stage and the excavation stage 3.Planning stage: remote sensing, fieldwalking, field surveys, building surveys, consulting historical and other documentary sources, and managing the sites and monuments 4.Excavation 1.Detailed information is recorded, including for each layer of soil, and for features such as pole holes, pits, and ditches. 2.Data about each artifact is recorded together with information about its exact find spot. 3.Numerous environmental and other samples are taken for laboratory analysis, and the location and purpose of each is carefully recorded. 4.Large numbers of photographs are taken, both general views of the progress of excavation and detailed shots showing the contexts of finds. 5.Organization and storage of material 6.Analysis and hypotheses generation and testing 7.Publications, museum displays 8.Information services for the general public

35. 35 ETANA Spaces 1.Geographic distribution of found artifacts 2.Temporal dimension (as inferred by archaeologists) 3.Metric or vector spaces 1.used to support retrieval operations, and to calculate distance (and similarity) 2.used to browse / constrain searches spatially 4.3D models of the past, used to reconstruct and visualize archaeological ruins 5.2D interfaces for human-computer interaction

36. 36 ETANA Structures 1.Site Organization 1.Region, site, partition, sub-partition, locus, … 2.Temporal orderings (ages, periods) 3.Taxonomies 1.for bones, seeds, building materials, … 4.Stratigraphic relationships 1.above, beneath, coexistent

37. 37 ETANA Streams 1.successive photos and drawings of excavation sites, loci, unearthed artifacts 2.audio and video recordings of excavation activities and discussions 3.textual reports 4.3D models used to reconstruct and visualize archaeological ruins.

38. 38 Hypothesis and Research Questions The 5S framework provides effective solutions to DL integration. –Formally define the DL integration problem? Given n individual libraries, integrate the n DLs to create a UnionDL. –Guide integration of domain focused DLs? How to formally model such domain specific DLs? How to integrate formally defined DL models into a union DL model? How to use the union DL model to help design and implement high quality integrated DLs? –Assess the integration?

39. 39 DL interoperability approach Intermediary-basedmapping-based Consists of mediatorwrapperagent use two architectures federationUnion Archiving used in Consists of hybrid mappercomposite mapper use schema mapping use Interrelated with GA trained by DL integration formalization based on

40. 40 Formal Definition of DL Integration DL i =(R i, DM i, Serv i, Soc i ), 1 i n –R i is a network accessible repository –DM i is a set of metadata catalogs for all collections –Serv i is a set of services –Soc i is a society UnionRep UnionCat UnionServices UnionSociety

41. 41 Union Catalog Quality Measurement Complete –All the catalogs to be integrated are complete. Consistent –All the catalogs to be integrated are consistent. –Each descriptive metadata specification in the union catalog describes only one digital object.

42. 42 Repository1 DL1 Repository2 Union Catalog Union Repository Catalog1Catalog2 Searching Union DLDL2 archaeologists Society General Public Society Archaeologists General Public Union Society Service Browsing Service Union Service Harvesting, Mapping, Searching, Browsing, Clustering, Visualization Architecture of a Union DL

43. 43 Integration of Domain Focused DLs Union archaeological metadata catalog generation Modeling archaeological DLs (ArchDLs) in the 5S framework ArchDL integration case study: ETANA-DL

44. 44 Union Catalog Integration VN Metadata Format Global Metadata Format VN Catalog HD Catalog Union Catalog Mapping Tool Wrapper Mapping Tool Wrapper HD Metadata Format Virtual Nimrin (VN) Halif DigMaster (HD) Union ArchDL

45. 45 ETANA-DL Schema Design Bone Seed Figurine ETANA-DL Object Count Animal …… Species Name …… Description Dimensions …… Owner Subpartition Partition Locus ID Container Collection ……

46. 46 Visualizing Components Mapper1 Composite Mapper Mapper2Mapper3Mapper4 Visual Mapping Tool Architecture

47. 47 Data Mapping (state-of-the-art)

48. 48 local schemaglobal schema

49. 49 Mapping recommendation

50. 50 Mapping confirmationMapping history

51. 51 Modeling ArchDLs in the 5S Framework Modeling archaeological information systems using the 5S theory to better understand the domain and design the system and the supported services Minimal DL Minimal ArchDL

52. 52 Digital Object Repository Collection Minimal DL Metadata Catalog Descriptive Metadata Specification A Minimal DL in the 5S Framework Structural Metadata Specification StreamsStructuresSpacesScenariosSocieties indexing browsing searching services hypertext Structured Stream

53. 53 StreamsStructuresSpacesScenariosSocieties indexing browsing searching services hypertext Structured Stream Descriptive Metadata specification SpaTemOrg StraDia Arch Descriptive Metadata specification ArchDO ArchObj ArchColl Arch Metadata catalog ArchDColl ArchDR Minimal ArchDL A Minimal ArchDL in the 5S Framework

54. 54 5S Meta Model 5SGraph DL Expert DL Designer 5SL DL Model 5SLGen Practitioner Researcher Tailored DL Services Teacher c omponent pool ODLSearch, ODLBrowse, ODLRate, ODLReview, ……. Requirements (1) Analysis (2) Implementation (4) Design (3) 5SGraph5SGen Mapping Tool 5SSuite for DL R&D

55. 55 5SGraph 5S Archaeology MetaModel ArchDL Expert ArchDL Designer Structure Sub-model ETANA-DL Union Services Descriptions Harvesting Mapping Searching Browsing … Scenario Sub-model VN Metadata Format ETANA-DL Metadata Format HD Metadata Format Mapping Tool Wrapper4VNWrapper4HD Inverted Files Services DB Index Browse Service Search Service Browse DB Other ETANA-DL Services Web Interface XOAI VN Catalog HD Catalog Union Catalog 5SGen Component Pool Browsing …