1. Community Water Supply Efficiency Improvements Preliminary Potential Estimates for the 7 th Power Plan November 18, 2014

2. Water Supply Overview  Processes  Collection  Treatment  Distribution  Energy Consumption:  Pumping 80%  Treatment 20%  New regulations for treatment may change the mix slightly  Ozonation  Membrane Filtration  UV Disinfection Source Type  Surface Water  More treatment energy  Less pumping energy  Ground Water  Less treatment energy  More pumping energy

3. Community Fresh Water in the PNW  USGS: 81% of PNW Population served by Community Water Systems  52% is Surface Water *  48% is Ground Water *  EPA: 4,570 community water systems in the 4 PNW states.  240 plants serve 80% of population served by CWS’s * By volume

4. Energy Savings Measures  VFD’s and low head loss valves  Distribution system pressure optimization (strategic use of booster pumps)  Fix leaks in distribution system  Optimize filtration (pre-treat before filtering)  Pump efficiency optimization  Premium efficiency motors  Low pressure UV lamps versus med. pressure  High efficiency single stage blowers  Compressed air efficiency measures  Use of low friction linings or coatings in piping

5. Water Supply Achievements  Achievements in 2010 -2012 have averaged just over 1.0 aMW region wide.

6. Seventh Plan Methods and Sources Municipal Water Supply ItemMethods & SourcesNote Measures Described Municipal water supply savings from reduced pumping energy. Measures include more efficient pumps/drives, water end-use efficiency improvements, and leak reduction. Energy Savings Calculation Basis The savings estimate is a share (12%) of total facility consumption, based on the BACGen study. This rate is adjusted based on achievements since then. Facility consumption data (kWh/MGD flow) are obtained primarily from Energy Center of Wisconsin case studies. ECW surface water energy consumption was calibrated with data from Seattle and Portland. When achievements are considered, the new shavings share is approximately 7%. Source of Savings Estimates Primary source is the BACGen studies conducted in 2006, 2007. This was used in 6th plan and will be used again here after adjustments for achievements. An EPA source indicated that 10% savings for water supply systems is relatively easy to achieve. A few regional data points from program data show savings in the 10 to 30% range. Therefore, we will continue with the 12% value (adjusting for achievements). Applicable Stock The applicable stock is the current flow of water in Million Gallons per Day (MGD), for both surface and groundwater sources. Primarily from the EPA report: 2008 EPA Clean Watersheds Needs Survey. Number of plants and baseline and capacity flow rates. 2013 EPA "population served" data, and 2005 USGS "withdrawals" data, adjusted for current population. Baseline Saturation Baseline is comprised of EPA flow data (MGD), combined with the ECW and local consumption (kWh/MGD) Baseline is largely based on 2006 data, but is adjusted with recent project achievements. Permutations Costs Recent project experience. From the BPA ESI program provided by Cascade: "ESI Data for NWPCC_v01.xls" New cost data are being used. Measure LifeFrom Sixth Plan - 12 years Non-Energy BenefitsNone Savings ShapeFlat Achievable Ramp RateRecent achievements from the BPA Six Going on Seven project.

7. Basic Formula (simplified) Flow - SW, GW (MGD) X Consumption Rate - SW, GW (kWh/MGD) = TOTAL CONSUMPTION (kWh) x Savings Rate (%) x Population Growth = Tech Potential in 2035 *SW=Surface Water, GW = Ground Water, MGD Million Gallons per Day Adjustments with new data

8. Load Shape  Don’t have a good load shape for Water Supply  6P used “Flat”, but that’s not right  Currently using a refrigerated warehouse ventilation shape  Matches pretty well with monthly data from one PNW major water supply facility  No daily data available 8

9. Seventh Plan Estimates  History  Sixth Plan Technical Potential: 16.2 aMW  Fifth Plan Technical Potential: 29 aMW  Seventh Plan Preliminary Potential  10.7 aMW

10. Cost  6P Used $0.77 per kWh, based on the BACGen study and ETO data  Proposed 7P cost estimate:  $0.24/kWh based on results from BPA project data (20 sites) 10

11. Status  Will update if additional data received  Utility data (savings and/or cost)  Load shape  2013 achievements