Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAubrey Banks Modified over 9 years ago
1
Coordinated School Health: Data-Driven Decisions for Healthier Schools
2
Coordinating School Health: Data-Driven Decisions for Healthier Schools A model developed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) to systematically improve children’s health by integrating health strategies of schools, public health agencies, families and community leaders through schools. http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/CSHP/
3
Three Facets of Health Physical SocialMental The World Health Organization defines health positively as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being,” not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.
4
The Picard Center & Coordinated School Health Mission Statement Our mission is to improve the physical, mental and social health of children and families through data-driven decision making and technical assistance, creating collaborative partnerships that emphasize a child centered philosophy.
5
The CDC Six Critical Health Behaviors Alcohol and Drug Use Injury and Violence (including suicide) Tobacco Use Nutrition (Obesity) Physical Activity Sexual Risk Behaviors http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/CSHP/
6
Middle School Example: 6-8 Grade (337 Participants) Body Mass Index
7
The Picard Center Critical issues facing students and the Louisiana Department of Education: –Truancy –Dropouts –Attendance –Behavior –Retention A key contributor to the student dropout rate is school discipline. A student is more likely to drop out if he/she has been suspended or expelled. 1 A student is also more likely to drop out if he/she has been retained–an almost inevitable consequence of multiple suspensions. 2
8
Risk Factors for Dropout: School Performance –Retention/Overage for Grade School Behavior –Early Aggression School Engagement –Low Commitment to School Early Adult Responsibility –Parenthood Family Background Characteristics Family Engagement/Commitment to Education Social Attitudes, Values & Behaviors Individual Background Characteristics –IEP? *Risk Factors were adapted from the National Dropout Prevention Center
9
One School District:
10
Coordinated School Health Areas of Focus: Alcohol and Other Drugs Obesity School Readiness Behavior Attendance and Truancy Student Health Services
11
What is our objective? Engage stakeholders in school improvement (school,district,community and state level) Collect data to drive CSH Implementation Conduct data analysis (trend, root-cause) Research best practices to address data discovered issues Organize fiscal and physical resources for healthy productive schools Build sustainable instructional teams that make a difference to students Provide Technical Assistance
12
Picard Center Coordinated School Health Model
13
PREREQUISITES TO SUCCESSFUL DISTRICT IMPLEMENTATION Coordinated School Health & PBS District Leadership Team Organizational Umbrella Financial Models Data-Driven Decision Making Political Support Progress Monitoring Pilot Sites (Demonstration Sites)
14
What is next? Areas of focus: –Alcohol & Other Drugs –Obesity –School Readiness –Behavior –Attendance & Truancy –Student Health Services (Physical & Mental)
15
Data Triangulation Example: BEHAVIOR Strengths –District Wide Implementation of Universal PBS –Reduced # of OSS –All schools completed S.E.T and Benchmarks of Quality Weaknesses –No schools implementing secondary interventions –Grant ending reducing mental health staff from 8 to 3 –Limited Community Mental Health Providers
16
From the data triangulation… The district team develops a goal & objectives on the area of focus: –Behavior goal: Maximize access to mental health resources within the school district and the community to maximize instruction.
17
Picard Center Coordinated School Health Model Issue
18
How do we get the help we need? Action Planning District Team School Based Team District Resources Community Health Advisory Council
19
Data Driven Decision Making Policies Practices Programs
20
References 1. Russell Skiba et al., The Dark Side of Zero Tolerance: Can Punishment Lead to Safe Schools? 80 Phi Delta Kappan, 372 (1999). 2. Jay P. Heubert & Robert M. Hauser, Ed.S., High Stakes: Testing for Tracking, Promotion, and Graduation, 129 (1999).
21
www.picardcenter.org Contact Information P.O. Box 42730, Lafayette LA 70504 Phone: 337-482-1567 Fax: 337-482-1553 Gabe Rodriguez 337-482-0507 gabe.rodriguez@louisiana.edu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.