Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Core Four Pest Management USDA-NRCS Cropland Technology Team.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Core Four Pest Management USDA-NRCS Cropland Technology Team."— Presentation transcript:

1 Core Four Pest Management USDA-NRCS Cropland Technology Team

2

3

4

5 Core Four5 Overview l Introduction to Core Four Pest Management l Pest Management Policy l Integrated Pest Management (IPM) l Environmental Risks of Pest Management l Implementing the Pest Management Standard l Using the Pest Management Jobsheet

6 Core Four6 Other Pest Management Training l A comprehensive NEDC self-paced study course entitled “Nutrient and Pest Management Considerations in a Conservation Management System Plan” l Extension and state agency training in pest management and pesticide applicator safety l Certified Crop Advisor Program

7 Core Four7 Introduction to Core Four Pest Management l Pest Management is a critical component of conservation planning l Pest Management must be used in conjunction with: –crop residue management –nutrient management –conservation buffers –other conservation practices

8 Core Four8 Core Four Pest Management Goals l The pest management component of a conservation plan should enhance crop quality and quantity + minimize negative impacts to identified resource concerns l IPM should be utilized where it’s available l The conservation plan should be cooperatively developed with whoever makes pesticide recommendations

9 Core Four9 NRCS Role In Core Four Pest Management l NRCS’s primary role in pest management is to help producers understand the environmental impacts associated with different pest control options, so they can fully incorporate environmental risk into their pest management decision-making process

10 Core Four10 Current Focus l Since pesticide impacts on water quality are a major concern, our emphasis is on: –Management factors that reduce the potential for pesticide movement below the rootzone and beyond the edge of the field (including management of crop, residue/tillage, water and pesticide(s) –Conservation Buffers that reduce pesticide movement beyond the edge of the field

11 Core Four11 To get the job done, NRCS must: l Supplement recommendations made by others with environmental risk information l Help producers understand how pest management interrelates with climate and soil, water and crop management, so they can implement strategies to minimize negative impacts on non-target plants, animals and humans

12 Core Four12 Stop

13 Core Four13 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) l A pest is any organism (plant or animal) judged by people as undesirable l Ecologically speaking, no organism is born a pest; it all depends on human perspective l Pest problems do not arise as independent or isolated events l Crops and pests are part of an agroecosystem

14 Core Four14 IPM l Attempts to control one pest species without regard for the overall agroecosystem, can disrupt checks and balances and increase the severity of subsequent pest infestations l IPM depends on a detailed understanding of pest population dynamics

15 Core Four15 Agricultural pests include: l Insects and related arthropods: invertebrates such as caterpillars, beetles and mites that cause injury by feeding on plants and animals and by transmitting pathogens l Nematodes: microscopic, multicellular, unsegmented roundworms that parasitize animals and plants (Most nematodes that attack agricultural crops feed on roots)

16 Core Four16 Agricultural pests include: l Pathogens: disease-causing bacteria, fungi, viruses and related organisms l Vertebrates: any native or introduced species of vertebrate animal that is a health hazard, general nuisance, or destroys food, fiber, or natural resources

17 Core Four17 Agricultural pests include: l Weeds: undesirable plants that reduce crop yield and quality by competing for space, water, and nutrients; weeds also may harbor crop-attacking insects and pathogens

18 Core Four18 Integrated Pest Management Defined: l Integrated pest management (IPM) is an approach to pest control that combines biological, cultural and other alternatives to chemical control with the judicious use of pesticides. The objective of IPM is to maintain pest levels below economically damaging levels while minimizing harmful effects of pest control on human health and environmental resources

19 Core Four19 IPM Theory

20 Core Four20 IPM Today

21 Core Four21 IPM l Integrated means that a broad interdisciplinary approach is taken using scientific principles of plant protection to bring together a variety of management tactics into an overall strategy l IPM strives for maximum use of naturally occurring control forces including weather, pest diseases, predators, and parasites

22 Core Four22 IPM l With IPM, the role for chemical pesticides is one of last resort if other alternatives fail to correct the problem l Pesticides are not applied according to a preset schedule: they only are used if close inspection shows they are needed to prevent severe damage

23 Core Four23 IPM l Management is the decision making process to reduce pest status in a planned, systematic way by keeping their numbers below economically acceptable levels l The essence of IPM is decision-making: determining IF, WHEN, WHERE and WHAT mix of control methods are needed

24 Core Four24 IPM l IPM attempts to satisfy economic, environmental and social objectives (which sometimes are in conflict with each other) to provide cost-effective pest control that minimizes adverse impacts on human health and the environment

25 Core Four25 IPM Tomorrow

26 Core Four26 Pest Resistance l Organisms evolve to survive exposure to control measures that worked on earlier generations l In theory, pests can develop resistance to any type of control l In practice, resistance occurs most frequently in response to pesticide use (600 resistant insects, 100 resistant weeds)

27 Core Four27 Pest Resistance l In the Midwest, farmers routinely rotate corn with soybeans to break the infestation cycle of the corn rootworm l The corn rootworm has developed strains that overcome crop rotation by extending their overwintering resting stage in the soil from one winter to several winters, so they can attack corn the next time it is planted

28 Core Four28 The Resistance Treadmill

29 Core Four29 Basic IPM Principles l There is no silver bullet –Over-reliance on any single control measure can have undesirable effects including resistance, resurgence and replacement

30 Core Four30 Basic IPM Principles l Tolerate, don't eradicate –Most crops tolerate low pest infestation levels –IPM seeks to reduce pest populations below levels that are economically damaging rather than to totally eliminate infestations

31 Core Four31 Basic IPM Principles l Treat the causes of pest outbreaks, not the symptoms –IPM requires a detailed understanding of pest biology and ecology so that the cropping system can be selectively manipulated to the pest's disadvantage

32 Core Four32 Basic IPM Principles l If you kill the natural enemies, you inherit their job –Naturally occurring predators, parasites, pathogens, antagonists and competitors help keep many pest populations in check –IPM strives to enhance the impact of beneficials and other natural controls by conserving or augmenting those agents

33 Core Four33 Basic IPM Principles l Pesticides are not a substitute for good farming –A vigorously growing plant can better defend itself against pests than a stressed plant –IPM takes maximum advantage of farming practices that promote plant health and allow crops to escape or tolerate pest injury

34 Core Four34 Putting IPM philosophy into practice: l Use cultural methods, biological controls, pest-resistant varieties and other alternatives to pesticides l Use scouting and economic thresholds to guide pesticide use decisions l Match pesticides with site characteristics to minimize off-site environmental risks

35 Core Four35 Cultural Pest Controls l Crop rotation l Tillage operations that turn the soil and bury crop debris l Altering planting and harvest dates l Altering seeding rates and/or crop spacing l Seedbed preparation, fertilizer application and irrigation that helps the crop to outgrow its pests

36 Core Four36 Cultural Pest Controls l Sanitation practices such as cleaning tillage and harvesting equipment l Certified seed that is free of pathogens and weed seed l Cover crops l Trap crops

37 Core Four37 Pest-resistant Varieties l Tolerate pest injury without yield loss l Kill pests by producing toxic chemicals l Less attractive to pests

38 Core Four38 Biological Controls l Predators –Free-living animals that eat other animals –Usually insects or arthropods, but birds, reptiles and mammals are also used

39 Core Four39 Biological Controls l Parasitoids –Insect parasites of other insects –Usually tiny wasps and flies –Parasitoids kill their host

40 Core Four40 Biological Controls l Pathogens –Disease causing microorganisms –They include viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes

41 Core Four41 Scouting & Pest Thresholds l A key principle of IPM is that pesticides should only be used when field examination or scouting shows that infestations exceed economic thresholds l These guidelines differentiate economically insignificant populations from intolerable infestations

42 Core Four42 Pest Scouting: Both Random and Representative

43 Core Four43 IPM Decision Rules

44 Core Four44 Site-Specific Pesticide Selection l The final component of IPM is selection of pesticides that pose the least risk of leaching through soil or being transported from fields in runoff water and sediment or drifting as spray particles on the wind

45 Core Four45 USDA National IPM Initiative l USDA, EPA and FDA responded to the President s proposal for reduced pesticide risk by jointly calling for the voluntary goal of implementing IPM methods on 75% of U.S. cropland by the year 2000 l To achieve the 75% adoption goal, the USDA announced on 14 December 1994 its National IPM Initiative

46 Core Four46 The IPM Initiative is based on two simple premises:  Involving farmers and other pest control advisors in the development of IPM programs will increase subsequent adoption Ë IPM benefits everyone: it can reduce environmental risk, improve food safety and increase farmer profitability

47 Core Four47 Stop

48 Core Four48 Environmental Risks of Pest Management l Chemical control –Risk of pesticides leaving the Agricultural Management Zone (AMZ) in soil, water and air, and negatively impacting non-target plants, animals and humans [AMZ is the top of the crop canopy to the bottom of the rootzone] –Risk of harming beneficial organisms –Risk to personal safety

49 Core Four49 Pesticides l Pesticides are defined as "any substance used for controlling, preventing, destroying, repelling, or mitigating any pest."

50 Core Four50 Pesticide Classes and Target Pests l Acaracide - Mites l Fungicide - Fungi l Herbicide - Weeds l Insecticide - Insects l Larvicide - Larvae (usually mosquito) l Miticide - Mites l Nematicide - Nematodes

51 Core Four51 Pesticide Use Patterns l Herbicides, insecticides and fungicides represent over 93% of the pesticide active ingredient used worldwide l Herbicides typically represent over 50% of pesticide use, followed by insecticides (23- 35%), and fungicides (11-14%)

52 Core Four52 Pesticide Classes and Functions l Attractants - attract insects l Chemosterilants - sterilize pests l Defoliants - remove leaves l Desiccants - speed drying of plants l Growth regulators - stimulate or retard pests l Pheromones - attract insects or vertebrates l Repellents - repel insects, mites, ticks and vertebrates

53 Core Four53 Pesticide Formulation Types l WP - wettable powder l S - solutions l F - flowable l G - granules or granular l D - dusts l SP - soluble powder l EC - emulsifiable concentrate

54 Core Four54 Adjuvants l Adjuvants are chemicals that are added to a pesticide formulation or spray mixture to improve performance and/or safety l Most pesticide formulations contain one or more adjuvants:  Wetting agents  Emulsifiers  Spreaders

55 Core Four55 Adjuvants  Stickers  Penetrants  Foaming agents  Thickeners  Safeners  Compatibility agents  Buffers  Antifoaming agents

56 Core Four56 Pesticides in the Environment l Over 1.2 billion pounds of pesticide active ingredients are used annually in the USA l The Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) is the primary legislation regulating pesticides in the USA l The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for the administration of FIFRA

57 Core Four57 Pesticides in the Environment l FIFRA was amended by the 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) –EPA must now: l consider all non-occupational exposure pathways when establishing tolerances (drinking water exposure + exposure to pesticide residues in food) l screen pesticides for endocrine disruption l consider cumulative risks of pesticides that have common mechanisms of toxicity

58 Core Four58 Pesticides in the Environment –Under FQPA EPA must also: l consider risks to infants and children when setting tolerances l expedite approval of "reduced risk" pesticides l report annually to Congress on progress of the pesticide re-registration program

59 Core Four59 Pesticide Risk Assessment Ê Consider the potential for exposure to the pesticide Ë Consider the toxicological hazard posed by the pesticide Ì Characterize risk by combining pesticide exposure and toxicity

60 Core Four60 Point Source Pesticide Exposure l Mixing/loading l Accidental spills l Container disposal

61 Core Four61 Non-Point Source Pesticide Exposure l Field Leaching l Field Runoff l Field Erosion

62 Core Four62 Environmental Fate l Understanding Pesticide Persistence and Mobility in Soil –Many factors govern the potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater or surface water –These factors include soil properties, pesticide properties, hydraulic loading on the soil, and crop management practices

63

64

65 Pesticide Environmental Fate Properties and NRCS Soil/Pesticide Interaction Screening Procedure (SPISP) Pesticide Ratings

66 Core Four66 Pesticides volatilization is determined by vapor pressure

67 Core Four67 Sensitivity / Vulnerability of Ground and Surface Water l Sensitivity refers to intrinsic physical and biological characteristics of a particular site that make it more or less susceptible to ground or surface water contamination l Sensitivity parameters include: –climate –soil characteristics –distance to water bodies

68 Core Four68 l Vulnerability refers to extrinsic management factors that could make a sensitive site more or less susceptible to ground or surface water contamination l Vulnerability parameters include: –pest management practices (including pesticide use practices) –cropping, tillage and irrigation practices Sensitivity / Vulnerability of Ground and Surface Water

69 Core Four69 Pesticide Environmental Risk Analysis l National assessments can be used to identify potential problem areas and set national workload priorities l Watershed level analysis can identify an appropriate set of management solutions l Field level analysis can appropriately apportion management solutions on a field by field basis

70

71

72

73 Core Four73 Pesticide Environmental Risk Analysis l Field scale tools can be used to address identified resource concerns in targeted areas l The Windows Pesticide Screening Tool (WIN-PST) evaluates the potential for off- site pesticide movement on a field by field basis

74 Core Four74 Pesticide Environmental Risk Analysis l WIN-PST is based on the NRCS Soil/Pesticide Interaction Screening Procedure (SPISP II) and National Agricultural Pesticide Risk Analysis (NAPRA) generic scenario results l WIN-PST can be downloaded from ftp.ma.nrcs.usda.gov\outgoing\WIN_PST

75

76

77

78 Core Four78 WIN-PST Soil/Pesticide Interactions Ratings l Soil/Pesticide interaction ratings for all applicable soils and pesticides provide a means to evaluate the potential environmental risks associated with all recommended alternatives l Appropriate mitigation strategies should be matched with alternatives that have substantial environmental risk

79 Core Four79 Pesticide Trapping with Conservation Buffers l Pesticides vary in how tightly they are adsorbed to soil particles l Pesticide Koc values greater than 1000 indicate very strong adsorption to soil l Eroded soil carries the majority of this kind of chemical leaving fields in runoff l Conservation buffers that are effective in trapping sediment will trap these pesticides

80 Core Four80 l Pesticides with lower Koc values (less than 300 to 500) tend to move more with water than adsorbed on sediment l To be effective in trapping this type of pesticide, buffers need to increase water infiltration or maximize contact of runoff with vegetation that may adsorb pesticide Pesticide Trapping with Conservation Buffers

81 Core Four81 Pesticide Toxicity: “The Dose Makes the Poison”

82 Core Four82 Toxicity Measurements l RfD - reference dose (no effect dose) l LD50 - lethal dose for 50% l LC50 - lethal concentration for 50% l HA - Health Advisory (Human Lifetime) l MCL - Maximum Contaminant Level (Human Lifetime) l MATC - Maximum Acceptable Toxicant Concentration (Fish Lifetime)

83 Core Four83

84 Average Annual Pesticide Runoff

85 Solution Runoff: Human Risk

86 Core Four86 Other Environmental Risks of Pest Control l Biological control: –Risk of introducing species without any natural predators –Risk of organism resistance to other forms of pest control –Risk of wide swings in pest population with poorly matched predator life cycles

87 Core Four87 l Cultural control: –Risk of fugitive dust with tillage used to control pests –Risk of air emissions with equipment operation –Risk of increased runoff and erosion with tillage –Risk of crop damage and beneficial organism disruption with mechanical control devices Other Environmental Risks of Pest Control

88 Core Four88 Stop

89 Core Four89 Core Four Pest Management Goals l The pest management component of a conservation plan should enhance crop quality and quantity + minimize negative impacts to identified resource concerns l IPM should be utilized where it’s available l The conservation plan should be cooperatively developed with whoever makes pesticide recommendations

90 Core Four90 To get the job done, NRCS must: l Supplement recommendations made by others with environmental risk information l Help producers understand how pest management interrelates with climate, water management, crop management and soil management, so they can implement strategies to minimize potential impacts on non-target plants, animals and humans

91 Core Four91 Core 4 and so much more… We’re here to help! Aid in the development of State or local standards Aid in the development of State or local Jobsheets Assist State Trainers Maintain and develop pesticide property, toxicity and EPA registration data Train WIN-PST and NAPRA users Perform NAPRA analysis in priority areas


Download ppt "Core Four Pest Management USDA-NRCS Cropland Technology Team."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google