1. The Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Richard Pont, adapted for 2003 North American Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop Honolulu, Hawaii August 11-14, 2003

2. What is the GHS? A common and coherent approach to defining and classifying hazards, and communicating information on labels and safety data sheets. Target audiences include workers, consumers, transport workers, and emergency responders. Underlying infrastructure for establishment of national, comprehensive chemical safety programs.

3. Where we are now: UNCED mandate (1992) Tripartite negotiations for over a decade (completed in December 2002) Stakeholder input continues to be vital as we begin to turn to implementation considerations

4. Scope of the GHS Harmonization of major existing systems for chemicals in transport, in the workplace, pesticides and consumer products—without lowering the level of protection afforded by those systems Classification based on intrinsic properties/hazards Scope covers all chemicals Consistent with U.S. regulatory framework

5. GHS Goals To promote safer transport, handling and use of chemicals world wide To facilitate international trade in chemical products by promoting greater consistency in regulatory requirements To reduce need for testing and evaluation To assist countries in developing strategies for sound management of chemicals

6. What should be harmonized Classification criteria for physical hazards

8. What should be harmonized Classification criteria for physical hazards, health hazards,

9. Health Effects Acute toxicity/lethality (oral, dermal, inhalation) Skin corrosion/irritation Serious eye damage/eye irritation Respiratory sensitization and skin sensitization Germ cell mutagenicity

10. Health Effects (continued) Carcinogenicity Reproductive and developmental toxicity, lactation effects Specific target organ/systemic toxicity (single and repeated exposure)

11. What should be harmonized Classification criteria for physical hazards, health hazards, and aquatic toxicity, for chemical substances and mixtures Certain standardized label elements: hazard pictograms, use of two signal words (danger and warning), and hazard statements for each hazard class and category [Product identifiers and precautionary statements] Format and contents for Safety Data Sheets

12. !

13. What does not need to change to be consistent with the GHS Supplemental information Testing methods and data requirements Use of risk-based labeling for chronic effects for consumer products in the consumer use setting Scope of hazards covered by national systems (“building block” approach) Downstream effects

14. General Implementation Expectations Voluntary international system—no binding treaty obligations on countries Intent is that countries with existing systems will harmonize them to be consistent with the GHS and Countries that do not have systems will adopt GHS as their basic system To extent that countries adopt GHS into their systems, binding regulatory changes for industry

15. Timing No international implementation schedule IFCS, WSSD goal of 2008; APEC goal of 2006 Different systems/sectors likely to require different time frames Steps to avoid disruption will need to be considered in transition from old to new labels

16. Next steps Analysis of existing policies and identification of differences between them and GHS, including “downstream effects” beyond hazard communication Extensive internal and external outreach to raise awareness and seek input Coordination with other agencies to maximize harmonization within the U.S. government

17. An example of classification and labeling under the GHS Acute toxicity

19. Classification Criteria for Mixtures Based on the classification criteria for substances Allows for the use of available data

20. Tiered Approach to Classification of Mixtures Generally use test data for the mixture, when available  Use bridging principles, if applicable  Estimate hazards based on the known ingredient information

21. Standard Label Elements: Acute Toxicity Hazard category SymbolSignal Word Hazard statement 1Skull and cross- bones Danger Fatal if swallowed (oral) Fatal in contact with skin (dermal) Fatal if inhaled (gas, vapor, dust, mist)

22. Standard Label Elements: Acute Toxicity Hazard category SymbolSignal Word Hazard statement 2Skull and cross- bones Danger Fatal if swallowed (oral) Fatal in contact with skin (dermal) Fatal if inhaled (gas, vapor, dust, mist)

23. Standard Label Elements: Acute Toxicity Hazard category SymbolSignal Word Hazard statement 3Skull and cross- bones Danger Toxic if swallowed (oral) Toxic in contact with skin (dermal) Toxic if inhaled (gas, vapor, dust, mist)

24. Standard Label Elements: Acute Toxicity Hazard category SymbolSignal Word Hazard statement 4Exclamation point Warning Harmful if swallowed (oral) Harmful in contact with skin(dermal) Harmful if inhaled (gas, vapor, dust, mist)

25. Standard Label Elements: Acute Toxicity Hazard category SymbolSignal Word Hazard statement 5No symbol Warning May be harmful if swallowed (oral) May be harmful in contact with skin (dermal) May be harmful if inhaled (gas, vapor, dust, mist)

26. Benefits of Harmonisation Countries, international organizations, chemical producers and users of chemicals all benefit. Enhance protection of humans and environment. Facilitate international trade in chemicals. Reduce need for testing and evaluation. Assist countries and international organizations to ensure the sound management of chemicals.

27. Conclusion Development of the GHS has been a difficult and long-term process. The work that has been completed has required much discussion and compromise. Implementation will also require a long-term effort and cooperation among countries, international organizations, and stakeholders at all levels.