1. CREATING A CAMPUS CULTURE FOR INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

2. Introduction & Workshop Goals RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009  Introduction  Goals 1. Discuss the 2 chosen processes of faculty engagement: assessment forum series and assessment in faculty projects. 2. Discuss the 2 highlighted processes of staff engagement: Data Management Committee and staff usage of institutional assessment data (i.e. NSSE, Common Data Set) 3. Brainstorm additional methods of campus engagement 4. Discuss tangible and non-tangible benefits resulting from improved campus climate

3. About Rose-Hulman  Terre Haute, Indiana  1800+ undergraduate students  B.S. degrees in engineering, science, and mathematics  80%+ engineering students  Accredited through ABET and North Central RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

4. Faculty Engagement RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009  Assessment and Learning Forum Series  Assessment in Faculty Projects

5. Assessment and Learning Forum  Began in 2005  6 topics per year  Faculty lead, IRPA planned  Recorded for archiving  Topics suggested by faculty or through anecdotal requests  Feedback and formal letter given to presenter for PTR folder RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

6. Past Forum Topics  Teaching with Cases  Assessing Individuals in a Team  Assessing Creativity  Learning Outcomes & E-portfolio  Educational Research  IRB Process  Putting Together a Teaching Portfolio  Effective Grading  CATs  Writing Letters of Recommendation  Teaching Evaluations  Rubrics RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

7. Forum Website All sessions taped and archived on- line for those who cannot attend. Password protected for internal usage only. RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

8. Faculty Projects  Classroom Assessment  Funded Projects  Conference/Journal Papers  PTR supporting data  Proposal support data RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

10. Staff Engagement  Data Management Committee (DMC)  Usage of Institutional Data RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

11. Data Management Committee  Composed of 1 representative from each functional unit (N=7)  Serves as conduit for data 1. Reps bring data from their unit 2. DMC compiles data 3. Compiled data goes back out to each unit & the cabinet  Created to increase communication about variety of data being collected and stored on campus  Data used in dashboards and key indicators for strategic planning RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

14. Usage of Institutional Data  NSSE  Common Data Set  AQIP  Electronic Portfolio System RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

15. Benefits 1. Data exists when needed for accreditation 2. Data collaboration by various units 3. Increased interest and understanding across campus 4. Shared workload RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

16. Additional Benefits RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009

17. Please contact us for more information after the conference. irpa@rose- hulman.edu www.rose- hulman.edu/ir pa RHIT/IRPA - NASPA 2009