Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”

Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”
INTRODUCTION: What does this slide refer to and mean. WE need a basic understanding of these terms: ETHICS: Of or relating to moral action, conduct, motive or character; as ethical emotion; also treating of moral feelings, duties or conduct; containing precepts of morality; moral. Professionally right or befitting; conforming to professional standards of conduct. STANDARDS: Stability, general recognition, and conformity to established practices. A type, model or combination of elements accepted as correct or perfect. A measure or rule applicable in legal cases such as the “standard of care” in tort actions. Reasonable man (or woman) doctrine. DEMEANOR: As respects to how one relates to physical appearance; outward bearing or behavior. Source: Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition How important are they to us in doing our jobs professionally? This is what our class will be based on today understanding these concepts and meeting established course/lesson learning objectives. Ethics General In-Service TCLEOSE # 3930 2-hours

PRESENTER Name: Background: Experience: Education: See Instructor BIO

Learning Objectives Unit 1 Expectations Unit 2 Ethical Terms
1.1 What is an Officer’s Oath 1.2 What does it mean to Serve and Protect 1.3 Define Moral Character 1.4 Define Public Trust Unit 2 Ethical Terms 2.1 What is Behavior (Define)? 2.2 What is Ethics (Define)? 2.3 What is Integrity (Define)? 2.4 What is Honor (Define)?

Learning Objectives - Continued
Unit 2 Ethical Terms - Continued 2.5 What is Courage (Define)? 2.6 What is Responsibility (Define)? 2.7 What is Accountability (Define)? 2.8 What is Prudence (Define)? 2.9 What is Trust (Define)? 2.10 What is Perception (Define)? 2.11 What are Standards (Define)? 2.12 What is Professionalism (Define)?

Unit 3 Ethics 3.1 What is our Duty & Responsibility? 3.2 Private Life 3.3 Honesty 3.4 Example 3.5 Personal Feelings, Beliefs and Prejudices 3.6 Firm – Fair and Courteously 3.7 Symbol of Public Trust 2.12 What is Professionalism (Define)?

Unit 4 Integrity and Professionalism 4.1 Abuse of Authority 4.2 Lying 4.3 Brutality 4.4 Sexual Misconduct 4.5 Loss of Evidence (Drugs or Money) 4.6 Alcohol or Drug Abuse 4.7 Deliberate Inefficiency

Unit 5 Ethics - Behavior 5.1 Public Perception 5.2 Ethics is about Behavior 5.3 Behavior is determined by Accountability 5.4 Expectation Highest Standards 5.5 Must be Responsible & Accountable

Unit 6 A.D.H.E.R.E. 6.1 Never Engage in Deceptive Practices 6.2 Monies, Personnel, Property or Equipment for Personal gain. 6.3 Falsify Training Records 6.4 Money or Special Favors in lieu of integrity 6.5 Machiavellian Theory 6.6 Fraudulent Reimbursements 6.7 Personal or Partisan advantage(s)

Unit 7 Professional Ethical Conduct 7.1 Integrity 7.2 Obey (comply) with the Law – No Double Standards 7.3 Position or Favors based on Friendship 7.4 Qualifications not Favoritism 7.5 Equality of Justice 7.6 Avoid Discrimination 7.7 Abuse/Mistreatment of Citizen

Unit 7 Professional Ethical Conduct 7.8 Sexual Misconduct 7.9 Romantic Relationships while on-duty 7.10 Confidentiality 7.11 Public Trust & Confidence critical 7.12 Joking vs. Public Image

Unit 8 Risk Management (Decision-making model) D.A.R.E. 8.1 Define 8.2 Assess 8.3 Respond 8.4 Evaluate Unit 9 Practical Application 9.1 Scenario 1 9.2 Scenario 2 9.3 Scenario 3 9.4 Scenario 4

Unit 10 Evaluation Question & Answers Test Review Instructor Evaluation Course/Lesson Critique Administration of 25 question Post-Test Must Pass by 70% Grade Test

Forward Like in our HISTORY it takes a special breed of person to be a Law Enforcement Officers. The RETORICA QUESTION is are you that person? ETHICS & LAWENFORCEMENT: Laws are malleable and law enforcement officials are entrusted with a considerable amount of latitude when enforcing laws. Unfortunately, many law enforcement officials abuse this power. Whether by mishandling evidence, practicing discriminatory profiling techniques or conducting warrantless searches, the acts of these officials raise important ethical questions about permissible activity regarding law enforcement. FOREWARD: Law enforcement personnel interact with the general public in personal settings and have access to private and confidential information. They deal with individuals in close quarters which can lead to the crossing of personal boundaries unless the situation has been previously addressed, at least in theory. Therefore, most law enforcement departments have a strict ethical code they require all personnel to agree with and to sign.

FACT “Give some people a gun and a badge and they think they are GOD’s gift to law enforcement, maintaining a child like attitude/demeanor believing the are in absolute control and authority; and that all should “FEAR: them.” These are the officers that cause us all more problems…….because they believe they have it all figured out and know every thing. EXPECTATIONS: U.S. citizens have a set of values and norms that they expect all law enforcement (local, state, and federal) to practice. To follow these norms and to gain respect, law enforcement personnel must remain ethical and conduct themselves accordingly at all times, both on and off duty. The law enforcement code of ethics and the police code of conduct represent the basis for ethical behavior in law enforcement. In addition, these codes encourage law enforcement's classification as a profession. However, these codes simply constitute words. For them to be effective, law enforcement officials and their leaders must consider them as the bible for law enforcement. Law enforcement personnel must not only believe in the codes but also follow them and display conduct that supports them. Thus, law enforcement officers must live the code. The law enforcement code of ethics is used as an oath of office during the graduation ceremony for many law enforcement personnel. Prospective law enforcement officers offer the oath to the state in exchange for the employment they receive. This oath remains morally binding throughout the officer's entire length of service in law enforcement. The code of ethics states that the officer's fundamental duties are to serve the community; safeguard lives and property; protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and respect the constitutional rights of all to liberty, equality, and justice. The code of ethics also states that officers must keep their private lives unsullied and recognize the badge as a symbol of public faith and trust. The next to last paragraph states, "I know that I alone am responsible for my own standard of professional performance and will take every reasonable opportunity to enhance and improve my level of knowledge and competence." The police code of conduct works in conjunction with the law enforcement code of ethics. The code of conduct consists of ethical mandates law enforcement officers use to perform their duties. These guidelines include acting impartially; exercising discretion; using only necessary force; and maintaining confidentiality, integrity, and a professional image at all times. These codes are only pieces of paper with words printed on them. Society judges ethical behavior by actions, not words. These documents provide the guidelines for law enforcement personnel to conduct ethical investigations, use only the force necessary to apprehend an individual, and avoid conflicts of interest and corruption. These ethical statements, along with appropriate training and strong leadership, encourage law enforcement officers to become members of an ethical profession. Remember: Any individual that claims to know everything there is to know about Law Enforcement – Run do not walk away as this person will get you hurt, killed or in trouble quicker than you can blink your eyes. That said Law Enforcement is a constant evolution of learning.

OFFICER OATH On my honor, I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character, or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always uphold the constitution my community and the agency I serve. OATH of HONOR: A public affirmation of adhering to an Oath of Honor is a powerful vehicle demonstrating ethical standards. To be successful at enhancing integrity within an organization, leaders must ensure the oath is recited frequently and displayed throughout the organization as well as ensuring ethical mentoring and role modeling are consistent, frequent and visible. The following Law Enforcement Oath of Honor is recommended as by the International Association of Chiefs of Police as symbolic statement of commitment to ethical behavior: Before any officer takes the Law Enforcement Oath of Honor, it is important that he/she understands what it means. An oath is a solemn pledge someone makes when he/she sincerely intends to do what he/she says. SOURCE: International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)

SERVE and PROTECT One of the main ethical responsibilities of law enforcement personnel is to serve, safeguard, protect and respect the rights of everyone. This responsibility can be seen practically through a law enforcement officer's response to crime victims or the most vulnerable members of society. Serve and Protect: One of the main ethical responsibilities of law enforcement personnel is to serve, safeguard, protect and respect the rights of everyone. This responsibility can be seen practically through a law enforcement officer's response to crime victims or the most vulnerable members of society. REMEMBER THIS: There are no new ways to get in trouble. There is always a better way to stay out of trouble. Things that go wrong in life are predictable and predictable is preventable. Knowledge is “Power” to help prevent.

MORAL CHARACTER Law enforcement personnel must be examples of the highest order regarding integrity and moral character. Self-control, honesty, courage and putting the needs of others above themselves are just four of the qualities they must exemplify. Moral Character: Law enforcement personnel must be examples of the highest order regarding integrity and moral character. Self-control, honesty, courage and putting the needs of others above themselves are just four of the qualities they must exemplify. Sometimes we hire “Bad People” – put them in a position of public trust and they continue to perpetrate their bad behaviors. These type of people (officers) hurt us all and do far more damage to our profession than good.

Professional Ethical Conduct Continued
Public trust & confidence are critical. If a citizen trust you they will tell you things they might never tell another citizen, friend or family member. Honoring Public Trust: Law enforcement personnel must pursue the ethical ideals and objectives of their respective departments. They must realize that their badge of office is a responsibility given to them by the public to guard and honor. TRUST is Built by deed and action and over time. Public trust & confidence are critical. If a citizen trust you they will tell you things they might never tell another citizen, friend or family member.

Ethical Terms Behavior Ethics Integrity Honor
Behavioral ethics is a new field of social scientific research that seeks to understand how people actually behave when confronted with ethical dilemmas.[1] It refers to behavior that is judged according to generally accepted norms of behavior. Or place individuals in decision-making situations that carry ethical questions. In each, an individual is asked to make a decision that affects another person Ethics, also known as moral philosophy, is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior. Normative ethics, about the practical means of determining a moral course of action. Applied ethics, about how moral outcomes can be achieved in specific situations; Public service ethics is a set of principles that guide public officials in their service to their constituents, including their decision-making on behalf of their constituents. Fundamental to the concept of public service ethics is the notion that decisions and actions are based on what best serves the public's interests, as opposed to the official's personal interests (including financial interests) or self-serving political interests Integrity: When used as a virtue term, ‘integrity’ refers to a quality of a person's character; however, there are other uses of the term. One may speak of the integrity of a wilderness region or an ecosystem, a computerized database, a defense system, a work of art, and so on. When it is applied to objects, integrity refers to the wholeness, intactness or purity of a thing—meanings that are sometimes carried over when it is applied to people. A wilderness region has integrity when it has not been corrupted by development or by the side-effects of development, when it remains intact as wilderness. A database maintains its integrity as long as it remains uncorrupted by error; a defense system as long as it is not breached. A musical work might be said to have integrity when its musical structure has a certain completeness that is not intruded upon by uncoordinated, unrelated musical ideas; that is, when it possesses a kind of musical wholeness, intactness and purity. Integrity is being the same person in both private and public life. Integrity is also attributed to various parts or aspects of a person's life. We speak of attributes such as professional, intellectual and artistic integrity. However, the most philosophically important sense of the term ‘integrity’ relates to general character. Philosophers have been particularly concerned to understand what it is for a person to exhibit integrity throughout life. Acting with integrity on some particularly important occasion will, philosophically speaking, always be explained in terms of broader features of a person's character and life. What is it to be a personof integrity? Ordinary discourse about integrity involves two fundamental intuitions: first, that integrity is primarily a formal relation one has to oneself, or between parts or aspects of one's self; and second, that integrity is connected in an important way to acting morally, in other words, there are some substantive or normative constraints on what it is to act with integrity. Honor:from the Latin word honos, honoris) is an abstract concept entailing a perceived quality of worthiness and respectability that affects both the social standing and the self-evaluation of an individual or corporate body such as a family, school, regiment or nation. Accordingly, individuals (or corporate bodies) are assigned worth and stature based on the harmony of their actions with a specific code of honour, and the moral code of the society at large. Honour is adherence to what is right. To some people it is also standing by or for someone cultures of honour with cultures of law. In a culture of law there is a body of laws which must be obeyed by all, with punishments for transgressors. This requires a society with the structures required to enact and enforce laws. A culture of law incorporates an unwritten social contract: members of society agree to give up some aspects of their freedom to defend themselves and retaliate for injuries, on the understanding that transgressors will be apprehended and punished by society. From the viewpoint of anthropologists, cultures of honour typically appear among nomadic peoples and herdsmen who carry their most valuable property with them and risk having it stolen, without having recourse to law enforcement or government. In this situation, inspiring fear forms a better strategy than promoting friendship; and cultivating a reputation for swift and disproportionate revenge increases the safety of one's person and property.

Ethical Terms – Cont’d:
Courage Responsibility Accountability Prudence Courage: (also bravery, boldness, fearlessness, mettle, fortitude, or intrepidity) is the ability to confront fear, pain, danger, uncertainty, or intimidation. Courage is acting in spite of fear. "Physical courage" is courage in the face of physical pain, hardship, death, or threat of death, while "moral courage" is the ability to act rightly in the face of popular opposition, shame, scandal, or discouragement. Courage is having the strength to withstand unethical pressure, fear or danger. Responsibility: the quality or state of being responsible: as a: moral, legal, or mental accountability b: reliability, trustworthiness. Responsibility is answering for your actions Accountability: the state, fact, or position of being accountable to somebody or for something. Taking care of your duties. Prudence: is the ability to govern and discipline oneself by the use of reason.[1] It is classically considered to be a virtue, and in particular one of the four Cardinal virtues (which are, with the three theological virtues, part of the seven virtues). It is often associated with wisdom, insight, and knowledge. In this case, the virtue is the ability to judge between virtuous and vicious actions, not only in a general sense, but with regard to appropriate actions at a given time and place. Although prudence itself does not perform any actions, and is concerned solely with knowledge, all virtues had to be regulated by it. Distinguishing when acts are courageous, as opposed to reckless or cowardly, for instance, is an act of prudence, and for this reason it is classified as a cardinal (pivotal) virtue. the more difficult tasks, which distinguish a person as prudent, are those in which various goods have to be weighed against each other, as when a person is determining what would be best to give charitable donations, or how to punish a child so as to prevent repeating an offense. In modern English, however, the word has become increasingly synonymous with cautiousness. In this sense, prudence names a reluctance to take risks, which remains a virtue with respect to unnecessary risks, but when unreasonably extended (i.e. over-cautiousness), can become the vice of cowardice. Adverse Distractor Factors Police Sub-Cultural Distracters: Corrosive influence. Emphasizes collective experience over training and procedure. Emphasizes group loyalty over duty. Built on distrust of outsiders. Alters definition of police success

Ethical Terms – Cont’d:
Trust Perception Standards Professionalism TRUST: PERCEPTION: STANDARDS PROFFESSIONASISLM:

ETHICS DUTY & RESPONSIBILITY
As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all persons to liberty, equality and justice. As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all persons to liberty, equality and justice.

ETHICS I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. What does this mean to you? Why is it important to keep your private life unsullied in respect to the perception of you and your professionalism? How does one’s private life reflect on their character, morality, norms and values? Are we human and vulnerable to self-deception? What then must we do to prepare ourselves to THINK and always try and do the right things for the right reasons verses impulse and on our emotions?

ETHICS – Cont’d: I will be honest in (WHAT)?
I will be exemplary in (What)? ETHICS – Continued: I will be honest in(What)? - thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department Why is it important to all of us to be honest in thought and deed? What are the consequences if we are not honest with ourselves? What are the consequences (ramifications) to us if our deeds (actions) are perceived as dishonest? Have you ever heard the saying “As a man thinketh, so is he”? What do you think this means? (Generate class discussion/participation) seek feedback to understand participant though process and how he/she is processing the information) Why is it important for you as a law enforcement officer (Deputy Constable) to obey the law and follow policy and procedure of our Constable’s Office?

ETHICS – Cont’d: Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty. What does the word Confidential mean? What is the difference between something that is personally confidential verses something that is professionally confidential? Examples of Personal: Relationship between you and your spouse (girl or boyfriend) A friend tells you something that is not immoral, illegal or against your cultural values, but that is private in nature. Examples of Professional: You have information involving the family member of someone you know (close friend) who is under investigation? (Saying anything could compromise the on-going investigation) You start drinking and talking about a drug investigation or sting while trying to impress someone you are out drinking with; in a public place. – What are (could be the ramifications of such an involuntary disclosure?) Do you see and understand how things (situations) like this can cause things to go South on you (and others) – quickly? Law Enforcement Officers should never reveal confidential information unless disclosure serves lawful professional purposes or is required by law.

ETHICS I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminal, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities. PROFILING/DISCRIMINATION: Law enforcement officials are charged with the duty to protect the citizens whom they serve. However, at times police officers practice unfair profiling techniques, serving to discriminate against segments of the population. Is this still happening within our law enforcement sub-culture today? Historically, racial profiling has been cited as a concern, particularly in the case of an African American subject named Rodney King, who was severely beaten by Los Angeles police officers in 1991. Treat people exactly how you would want to be treated if the situation were reverse – while maintain your vigilance

ETHICS Badge of Office I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession...law enforcement. What does the badge you wear represent to you? What does this same badge represent to the public? What does this badge you wear mean to you – personally? SYMBOL OF: Public Faith Public Trust Your personal obligation to be true to law enforcement ethics over your own ethics and personal beliefs. Your commitment to consistently seek to improve yourself as a law enforcement professional (Study to show thyself approved)

Introduction Law Enforcement Officers are dedicated to the highest levels of integrity and professionalism. Law Enforcement Officers are dedicated to the highest levels of integrity and professionalism and pledge to continue to work with our schools and community to solve problems of concern. EXPECTATION: Every citizen (man, woman, and child) has a right to a safe and secure living, work and learning environment. What are the established highest levels of professionalism standards? (Someone define them for me) What we have learned (know from history):The greater the officer’s ability to avoid accountability, the greater the amount of police misconduct. The police subculture often defeats accountability. (HOW?) We have bad cops because good cops protect them. (THE WHY)

SYSTEMIC ETHICAL PROBLEMS in Law Enforcement
Abuse of Authority Lying Brutality Sexual Misconduct Corruption: Corruption represents one ethical issue facing law enforcement officers. Police corruption is the lack of police integrity. (9) It also constitutes one of the most significant obstacles to positive police-public relations in today's society. Police corruption includes acts of brutality, excessive force, inefficiency, and, among others, the use of public office for private gain. Eight corruption issues face law enforcement personnel daily. These issues are the-- (1.) acceptance of gratuities; (2.) association with known criminals without a supervisor's knowledge or consent; (3.) disclosure or furnishing of confidential information, files, reports, computer information, or the identity of confidential sources to unauthorized persons; 4) disclosure of any information concerning ongoing or planned investigations to any officer, person, agency, office, bureau, department, news medium, or group not directly involved in the investigation, without the express consent of the commanding officer; 5) falsification of affidavits, warrants, or other official reports; 6) harassment of, taking action against, or failing to take proper action against any person due to race, sex, creed, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation; 7) sexual or ethnic harassment of citizens, coworkers, or subordinates; and 8) failure to protect the rights of citizens and to follow laws, policy, and court decisions regarding those rights with reference to probable cause, arrest, evidence, interrogation, collection/protection and report preparation! submission. Several studies have classified corrupt situations into three different groups." Individual corruption exists when a few corrupt individual officers work in a department that actively discourages corruption. Organizational corruption represents illegal and unprofessional acts common in a department in which both officers and administrators are involved together in a widespread and organized practice of corruption, contrary to written policies, regulations, and procedures. Finally, environmental corruption exists where politically significant groups or the collective population generally tolerates and, perhaps, actively supports corrupt practices by law enforcement personnel, other agencies, businesses, and average citizens. Corruption exists at all levels of law enforcement, and it must be controlled. One expert lists four methods for controlling corruption in law enforcement agencies. Strong leadership: The department's leadership must lead by example and avoid any questionable conduct.

SYSTEMIC ETHICAL PROBLEMS in Law Enforcement – Cont’d
Theft Loss of drugs or seized dug money Alcohol/Drug Abuse Deliberate Inefficiency If you will steal from others you will steal from your law enforcement brothers and sisters! CODE OF SILENCE: Stringent codes of conduct govern the behavior of law enforcement officials. However, when these codes are violated some officials voluntarily abide by a code of silence in order to protect their colleagues. Whistle blowers who report misconduct of fellow officers are often shunned, and may themselves become the victims of uncomfortable investigations that examine any minor violations or transgressions they have committed in the line of duty (see Reference 1). Consequently, officers tend to observe this code of silence rather than considering breaking it. MISHANDLING OF EVIDENCE: Through acts of commission and acts of omission, law enforcement officials may mishandle evidence (see Reference 3). Whether they are committing violations by planting evidence or violation procedure by failing to document a chain of custody for evidence, police officers occasionally mishandle evidence. Such mishandling may result in convictions of innocent citizens, who may be sentenced to life in prison or even be assigned to death row.

ETHICS – Cont’d: Police conduct determines the public’s perception of law enforcement. Ethics is about behavior. Behavior is determined by accountability Ethical Standards: As society has evolved, the questions and concerns that involve ethics and ethical behavior have grown more difficult to address. Ethical standards have become both more complex and scrutinized by the public than at any other time in history. Therefore, law enforcement personnel must carry out tasks assigned to them while the rules and laws constantly change and their freedom to perform the necessary tasks becomes obstructed. Citizens expect law enforcement officials to operate in an efficient and professional manner without expressing personal views and emotions. To accomplish this, law enforcement personnel must have a strict and unwavering adherence to a code of ethics and a code of conduct.

ETHICS - General Law Enforcement Officers working in any environment are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards of our profession. We recognize and respect the community, and respond to their needs without bias or prejudice, responding to the ever-changing needs of our community. We embrace the values of integrity, public service, competence, responsibility and accountability, while maintaining a workplace environment based on mutual respect. School-Based Law Enforcement Officers working in any school are expected to adhere to the highest ethical standards of our profession including honesty, loyalty, accountability and responsibility.

ETHICS - General Police Officers “MUST” be Responsible and Accountable for Their Own Professional Conduct Law Enforcement Agencies like to claim that each high-profile abuse is an aberration, committed by a `rogue' officer. But these human rights violations persist because the accountability systems are so defective Law enforcement officers are professionals; they work in a skilled occupational group whose prime consideration constitutes providing a service that benefits the public. Because law enforcement is a profession, ethics and ethical conduct play an important role. Ethics and ethical standards involve doing the right thing at the right time in the right way for the right reason.

Accountability Demands High Ethical Responsibility Enforcement
ETHICS: Accountability Demands High Ethical Responsible Enforcement (A.D.H.E.R.E.) We must learn to police ourselves and our brother & sister officers: We must ADHERE to high professional (law enforcement industry) standards. By virtue of the badge of office (and positions of trust) we hold we are accountable and responsible for everything we say or do. It is not (can never be) “Do as I say do, not what I am doing myself” words, image and demeanor must match high ethical standards in order to achieve responsible enforcement of our laws. “Liberty and Justice for all on an equal basis”.

Professional Ethical Conduct
Law Enforcement Officers should never knowingly engage in deceptive practices. Law Enforcement Officers should not ever knowingly engage in deceptive practices regarding official policies or in with enforcing the law. What can be some consequences of engaging in deceptive practices regarding our official policies and procedures and/or the laws we are sworn to preserve and enforce? Let’s look at some deceptive practices.

Law Enforcement Officers should never knowingly: misappropriate, divert, or use monies, personnel, property, or equipment committed to his or her charge for personal gain or advantage. Law Enforcement Officers should never knowingly: misappropriate, divert, or use monies, personnel, property, or equipment committed to his or her charge for personal gain or advantage. WHY? What are the consequences of such actions (behavior) to you, others and your agency?

Professional Ethical Conduct and Integrity (Training)
Law Enforcement Officers should never knowingly or intentionally: falsify training records, pay or receive money, for actual training credit(s) he/she did not receive or attend, to do any of the above is not only a serious breech of ethics and integrity; it is a criminal offense. Law Enforcement Officers should never knowingly or intentionally: falsify training records, pay or receive money, offer and/or receive special favors or other benefits in exchange/return for actual training credit(s) he/she did not receive, or attend, to do any of the above is not only a serious breech of ethics and integrity; it is a criminal offense.

Consequences Lose your TCLEOSE License Criminal indictment
for person paying or offering for person receiving Tarnish law enforcement agencies image Other officers could lose their TCLEOSE hours PROFESSIONAL ETHICAL CONDUCT - Continued: CONSEQUENCES: for knowingly or intentionally: falsifying training records, paying or receiving money, and/or for offering and/or receiving any special favors or other benefits in exchange/return for being given actual training credit(s) that he/she did not receive. An officer-deputy can: Lose your TCLEOSE License Criminal indictment for person paying or offering for person receiving Tarnish law enforcement agencies image Other officers could lose their TCLEOSE hours all because one or more of their brother and/or sister officers/deputies sold out. Rhetorical Question: Is what I am about to do legal, ethical and moral and how will it affect me, my colleagues and my agency?

THINK Think Machiavellian “Will the ends justify the means”?
What will be the “CONSEQUENCES”? THINK (before you do) Think Machiavellian “Will the ends justify the means”? What will be the “CONSEQUENCES” to: YOU; YOUR FAMILY YOUR COLLEAGUES YOUR PROFESSION ? AGAIN: Rhetorical Question: Is what I am about to do legal, ethical and moral and how will it affect me, my colleagues and my agency?

Law Enforcement Officers should never submit fraudulent requests for To do so intentionally would constitute a criminal offense by law. Law Enforcement Officers should never submit fraudulent requests for reimbursement, expenses, or pay. To do so intentionally would constitute a criminal offense by law. What message are you sending? Where is your honor? Where is your integrity?

Law Enforcement Officers should never use institutional or professional privileges for Law Enforcement Officers should never use institutional or professional privileges for: personal or partisan advantage. Lead a group/class discussion: What are we saying by this statement? What is implied? How could this be seen (viewed) as ethical misconduct? What are some examples

Law Enforcement Officer should never accept or offer favors that impair professional judgment or to obtain special advantage. Law Enforcement Officer should neither accept nor offer gratuities, gifts, or favors that impair professional judgment or to obtain special advantage. This standard shall not restrict the acceptance of gifts or…Tokens offered and accepted openly from students, parents, or other persons or organizations in recognition or appreciation of service. Law Enforcement Officer should remember when refusing to accept gratuities, gifts, or favors from a citizen, group or organization the decline should be done in a very tactful manner so as not to offend or diminish the professional law enforcement and citizens relationship. Thank the citizen for their thoughtfulness and let them know the mere thought is sufficient in showing appreciation for you the officer. Never take unnecessary chances/risks. THINK

Law Enforcement Officers should never falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so. Law Enforcement Officers should never deliberately or knowingly misrepresent facts Law Enforcement Officers should never falsify records, or direct or coerce others to do so. Law Enforcement Officers should never deliberately or knowingly misrepresent facts as a law enforcement officer you do not like it when someone lies to you; then why lie to others? Never make-up stuff on the fly. Do not say things you cannot back-up. Where does this leave you with citizen, if they know the truth and catch you in a lie or exaggeration of truth? What usually happens then? – you get angry and try and defend yourself many times becoming offensive in/with you defense. Therefore do no (NEVER) set your own self up!

INTEGRITY Is like “VIRGINITY” once it is gone it (will not come back) or at least it will never be the same again! “People can “FORGIVE” but they will not “FORGET” INTEGRITY: Is like “VIRGINITY” once it is gone it (will not come back) or at least it will never be the same again! “People can “FORGIVE” but they will not “FORGET” To error is human and to forgive is divine, but human nature is never to forget. INTEGRITY: As used in statutes prescribing the qualifications of public officers, trustees, etc., this term means soundness or moral principal and character as shown by one’s personal dealing with others in the making and performance of contracts, and fifelity and honesty in the discharge of trust; it is synonymous with probity, “honesty and uprightness”. Source: Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition.

Law Enforcement Officers should always comply with the “LAW” Double Standard: Enforcing on others what you do not obey and follow yourself. Law Enforcement Officers should always comply with the “LAW” local ordinances, regulations & laws, written policy & procedures; as well as applicable state and federal laws. Double Standard: Enforcing on others what you do not obey and follow yourself. What are some potential consequences for your failing to follow the laws? What are some potential consequences for your failing to follow your agency policies and procedures? What are the RISKS and/or LIBALITIES to: You Your Family Others You’re Agency?

Law Enforcement Officers should never accept a position or a responsibility on the basis of personal friendship or as a favor. For the ultimate price may be well more than you can afford. Law Enforcement Officers should never accept a position or a responsibility on the basis of personal friendship or as a favor. REMEMBER: the ultimate price for your action(s) may be well more than you can afford to or can pay in the end. You are cheating yourself. You are cheating others. Scenario: Hey, help me make sergeant. We have known each other for years and I need the money for my family. Think about this. What could be (are) some potential consequences here? Let’s list some PRO’s and CON’s (Use white board or chart paper) select a student/participant and have them list class responses. Analyze responses. Discuss appropriate behavior.

Position and responsibility should always be based on professional qualifications. Law Enforcement officers must never show or appear to show favoritism. Position and responsibility should always be based on professional qualifications. Such as: Knowledge Veteran Experience Demonstrated (proven) skill level mastery Never based on who you know, but what you know. Law Enforcement officers must never show or appear to show favoritism. Do law enforcement officers get promoted based on who they know (favoritism)? Is that our perception or is that reality? Are we sometimes biased? Do we as law enforcement officers assume or is it our duty and responsibility to know (gather all) the facts? Human behavior is diverse and our feelings, logic and emotions sometimes over-ride facts. (What is wrong with this?) We need to seek to understand in order to be understood.

Law Enforcement Officers should not interfere with a colleague's exercise of citizenship rights and responsibilities. Law Enforcement Officers should not interfere with a colleague's exercise of citizenship rights and responsibilities. It is our duty and responsibility of every law enforcement officer to protect the rights of all people. To preserve our constitutions (both federal and state) as well as enforce applicable laws and ordinances. What are some potential scenarios where one might feel their rights and liberties are violated? Free Speech Right to bear arms Do our society norms and cultures (diverse sub-cultures) come into play here? If so how.

Law Enforcement Officer should never discriminate against a colleague on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status Law Enforcement Officer should never discriminate against a colleague on the basis of: race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, disability, or family status WHY: Violates State and Federal Laws It is ethically and morally wrong How can one enforce what he/she does not believe (practice doing) by deed and action themselves? Most importantly we in law enforcement need to always remember that if we want (demand) respect we must be willing to show it (give it).

Law Enforcement Officer should never engage in physical mistreatment of a citizen. Law Enforcement Officer should never engage in physical mistreatment of a citizen. Today more than any time in our past we are vulnerable to being recorded and/or videotaped. Technology has placed us all under a microscope – more so than ever before. (This photo was from the 1960’s) In addition we must be self-disciplined so as to not allow ourselves to be set-up, goaded and/or provoked into actions we cannot later justify. People do not listen to what is being said as much as they focus on what they see. THINK ABOUT U-TUBE Think about what you post on FaceBook and other internet sites.

Law Enforcement Officers should not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to influence professional decisions or colleagues. Law Enforcement Officers should not use coercive means or promise of special treatment in order to influence professional decisions or colleagues. Piety requires us to honor truth above our friends.“…Aristotle Coercive: Compel to compliance; constrain to obedience or submission in a vigorous or forceful manner. Source: Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition Bribe Threaten (Force or to make false Allegations) Use of unlawful influence Elimination of “Free Will” Withholding of a legal action, right or civil liberty Denial of “Due Process” Piety requires us to honor truth above our friends.“…Aristotle

Law Enforcement Officers should never solicit or engage in sexual misconduct or in a romantic relationship while on-duty. Law Enforcement Officers should never solicit or engage in sexual misconduct The “REALITY” is You are going to: tempted seduced solicited What you do is going to have a direct reflection upon: YOU YOU’RE AGENCY ALL YOUR COLLEAGUES

SYSTEMIC Acts of Sexual Misconduct
Sexual Bribery/extortion. Illicit sexual encounters Sexual liaisons. Voyeurism. SYSTEMIC Acts of Sexual Misconduct Sexual Bribery/extortion. Illicit sexual encounters Sexual liaisons. Voyeurism. LOOK AT THE PHOTO it is going to happen sooner or later; if it has not already HAPPENED. “Let me go and I will ring our bell” Truly famous last words. SELF-DISCLIPINE and GODD MORAL INTERPETUIDE will keep you safe, employed and with your integrity intact. This is where “YOUR MORAL COMPASS” will play a big role in how you respond. “Let me go and I will ring our bell”

Who are you to tell me who I can have sex with?
I am your brother officer who wears the same badge as you do. I am your partner and one who must place his trust in and life with you. Citizens do not see the person – they see the badge! Who are you to tell me who I can have sex with? A colleague A veteran with personal experience REMEMBER: Citizens do not see the person – they see the badges we all wear. I am your (potential) partner and one who must place his life in your hands. OFF DUTY YOUR BUSINESS: ON DUTY EVERYONE WHO WEARS A BADGE’s BUSINESS! (What you do or fail to do reflects on us all collectively. Stay vigilant: If it does not look or feel right is probally is not right! If when you walk up to a violator you can see too much, or to much is being revealed then cover your assets and write a ticket and prepare a report. Then when the solicitor calls Internal Affairs you are prepared. FOOD FOR THOUGHT: I will not sleep with you, cook for you, clean your clothes, etc. like your wife does, if you cannot be loyal to her – how can I trust you to hold my life in your hands? OFF DUTY YOUR BUSINESS – ON DUTY EVERYONE WHO WEARS THE SAME BADGE’S BUSINESS!

Be careful in joking and playing around. Certain actions could be misinterpreted or perceived the wrong way. Be careful in joking and playing around with a citizens and/or brother & sister officers. Certain actions could be misinterpreted or perceived the wrong way. REMEMBER: What may be funny to you is not to someone else. What may be innocent to you may be very offensive to others. What may be a joke to you may be Sexual Harassment to someone else. RULE OF THUMB: “Stay Professional” at all times when on-duty (suggested off-duty as well). You can have good habits or bad habits, the decision/choice is yours and so are the consequences attached.

Be aware at all times of the responsibility to improve the image of the uniformed law enforcement officer in the eyes of the community rest in your hands. Be aware at all times of the responsibility to improve the image of the uniformed law enforcement officer in the eyes of the community rest in your hands. Maintaining good ethics is a delicate balance and requires some effort, moral conviction, commitment and consistency.

Human Error Vs. INTENT Was the action an honest Human Error?
Was it INTENTIONAL with personal gain as the motivating factor? Human Error Vs. INTENTIONAL Was the action an honest Human Error? Was it INTENTIONAL with personal gain as the motivating factor? Remember this Famous Super Bowl Incident People get into trouble for only two (2) reasons. Some of our problems come from intentional misconduct, where bad people do bad things on purpose knowing what they did was bad when they did it. Negligent Misconduct (Human Error).

RISK MANAGEMENT Decision-Making Model (D.A.R.E.)
Define Assess Respond Evaluate Define: Identify (describe) the problem, challenge or opportunity. Assess: What are your choices? What are the “POSITIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices? What are the “NEGATIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices? To you and your image (perception of your integrity, ethical standards and professionalism) To your agency image (perception) To your brother and sister officers Your family To the community you serve Respond: Based on critical thinking skills make a choice based on the facts and information you have assessed above – then act (STOP and Think before you do!) Evaluate: Review your decision from a “Best Practice” standpoint (lessons learned) did you make a good decision analysis.

RISK MANAGEMENT – Cont’d Decision-Making Model (D.A.R.E.)
Define: Identify (Think about and describe) the problem, challenge or opportunity. Define: Identify (Think about and describe) the problem, challenge or opportunity. What is it that you are about to do? What is happening that is shaping events involving you? What is going on? What “Happening” or about to happen

Assess: What are your choices? What are the “POSITIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices? What are the “NEGATIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices? Assess: What are your choices? What are the “POSITIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices? To you and your image (perception of your integrity, ethical standards and professionalism) To your agency image (perception) To your brother and sister officers Your family To the community you serve What are the ”NEGATIVE” consequences for/of your actions/choices

Respond: Based on critical thinking skills. Respond: Based on critical thinking skills make a choice based on the facts and information you have assessed above – then act (STOP and Think before you do!)

Evaluate: Review your decision from a “Best Practice” standpoint

DEFINE & PROCESS SCENARIO #1: It is 2:00 am you get a call there has been a wreck in your coverage area. You arrive to see a brother officer in a wrecked un-marked car with alcohol heavily on his breath. He ask you look the other way and take him home He says “I am a sergeant take to me me home”.

DISCUSSION How will (could) this action have a negative impact on you?
What are the negative consequences? What should have been done? How will you handle this action? What can you do to prevent it? APPLY the D.A.R.E. Decision-Making Model previously discussed

DEFINE & PROCESS SCENARIO #2: Your partner confides in you that last night he beat up a female black lesbian because she refused him sexual favors and he taught her a lesson. He tells you “She was just a worthless “black whore” who got what she deserved for not not cooperating with the POLICE.

DEFINE & PROCESS SCENARIO #3: You arrive on the scene and observe four (4) officers beating the hell out of a Hispanic male suspect; while five (5) other officers watched on and encouraged more beating – while making disparaging racial remarks. Photo is of Rodney KING

DEFINE & PROCESS SCENARIO #4: You are working in the Court Room and observe a young person wearing his pants well below the waste-line in blatant defiance of and in total disregard to Court Room dress requirements, how would you handle this?

What are the negative consequences? What impression (image) do you want to impart? What should have been done? How will you handle this action? What can you do to prevent it? APPLY the D.A.R.E. Decision-Making Model previously discussed

QUESTIONS

Post - TEST You will be administered a 25-question Test over the material just presented. You must score 70% or better on this test to receive TCLEOSE credit for this course. Test Review Instructions – Must Print name and PID# on each page of your test. Grade Test (exchange papers with person sitting next you – grader will indicate Graded by: and insert his/her PID# on last page of Test.

SOURCES Gerald R. Adams, Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) - Retired George D. Little, C.C.P.S. Gordon Graham Jack Ryan Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition

Researcher & Developer
George D. Little, C.C.P.S., MS C & CT, BS, BA, AS & AA Master License Peace Officer PID# SG/E-8 U.S. Army MP (ABN) - Retired Deputy Sheriff BCSO– D.A.R.E. Coordinator - Retired Former Director, Institute for Criminal Justice Studies (Med-Ret) Deputy Chief, INTEL, DHS & Training BCCO PCT#4 Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Texas D.A.R.E. State Coordinator & Secretary Bexar County D.A.R.E. BOD International Counter-Terrorism Officer Association (ICTOA) – State Coordinator Cell: (210)

Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Law Enforcement Officer “ETHICS, STANDARDS and DEMEANOR”"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback