1. HALL HIGH SCHOOL Academic Indicators 1999- 2009

2. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards (reading, math, science) 2002………………………………..43%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..42%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..48%2007………………………………..46% 2008………………………………..51%

3. ACT Scores Class of English Reading Math Science Comp Class of English Reading Math Science Comp 1999 22.1 20.6 21.5 21.4 21.5 2000 21.3 21.4 20.6 21.6 21.4 2001 21.2 21.7 19.6 21.4 21.1 2002* 19.8 20.0 19.5 19.8 19.9 2003 18.7 18.0 17.5 18.2 18.2 2004 20.7 19.8 20.0 19.8 20.2 2005 18.9 19.4 18.4 19.2 19.1 2006 19.4 18.9 18.8 19.6 19.3 2007 20.2 19.5 19.1 19.8 19.8 2008 19.4 19.0 19.5 19.8 19.6 2008 19.4 19.0 19.5 19.8 19.6 *---- first year all students were tested

4. Graduation Rate 1999……………..89% 2006……………92% 2000……………..88% 2007……………95% 2001……………..84% 2008……………82% 2002……………..91% cut score (75%) 2003……………..79% 2009…………… 2004……………..88% 2005……………..82% 10 Year Average= 87%

5. Attendance Rate 1999……………..94% 2006……………95% 2000……………..95% 2007……………97% 2001……………..96% 2008……………99% 2002……………..97% 2009…………… 2003……………..96% 2010…………… 2004……………..94% 2005……………..96% 9 Year Average= 96%

6. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..58%2002………………………………..46%2003………………………………..58%2004………………………………..49%2005………………………………..51%2006………………………………..50%2007………………………………..43% 2008……………………………...53% (62.5%) 2009………………………………55% (70%)

7. Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Reading 2001………………………………..4%2002………………………………..8%2003………………………………..6%2004………………………………..6%2005………………………………..11%2006………………………………..11%2007…………………………………5%2008…………………………….10%

8. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..54%2002………………………………..33%2003………………………………..56%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..40%2006………………………………..44%2007………………………………..48% 2008…………………………50% (62.5%) 2009…………………………45% (70%)

9. Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Mathematics 2001………………………………..2%2002………………………………..3%2003………………………………..4%2004………………………………..1%2005………………………………..1%2006………………………………..3%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………4.5%

10. Students meeting or exceeding the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..50%2002………………………………..35%2003………………………………..51%2004………………………………..39%2005………………………………..45%2006………………………………..46%2007………………………………..47%2008……………………………48%

11. Students EXCEEDING the Illinois Learning Standards- Science 2001………………………………..7%2002………………………………..6%2003………………………………..7%2004………………………………..5%2005………………………………..10%2006………………………………..5%2007………………………………..6%2008……………………………….6%

12. ACADEMIC SYSTEMSBEHAVIORAL SYSTEMS Tier 1 Core Instructional Interventions All students Preventive, proactive 80% Tier 2 Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 15% Tier 3 Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment - based High intensity Of longer duration 5% T 80% Tier 1 Core Instructional Interventions All settings, All students Preventive, proactive Tier 3 Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment - based Intense, durable procedures 5% Tier 2 Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 15% What Does RtI Look Like? Batsche, G. M., Elliott, J., Graden, J., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., et al. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc.