Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Adding charts anywhere Assume a cow is a sphere Cindy Grimm and John Hughes, “Parameterizing n-holed tori”, Mathematics of Surfaces X, 2003 Cindy Grimm,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Adding charts anywhere Assume a cow is a sphere Cindy Grimm and John Hughes, “Parameterizing n-holed tori”, Mathematics of Surfaces X, 2003 Cindy Grimm,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Adding charts anywhere Assume a cow is a sphere Cindy Grimm and John Hughes, “Parameterizing n-holed tori”, Mathematics of Surfaces X, 2003 Cindy Grimm, “Parameterization using Manifolds”, International Journal of Shape Modelling, 2004

2 2 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Motivation Surface modeling: Adding more degrees of freedom Don’t want to be restricted to existing charts/dof Computers support vectors (points in R n ) Functions on R n Splines, gradient descent algorithms Define functions directly on sphere? BRDFs, environment maps

3 3 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Observation We can define lots of meshes that are spheres Which one’s the “right” one? How do you compare two sphere meshes?

4 4 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Approach Find a computationally tractable way to represent some common domains E.g., sphere, torus, plane Doesn’t depend on any particular geometry Questions to answer: What is a point? (Convert from R n to domain) Movement in domain Barycentric coordinates, linear interpolation

5 5 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Once we have a domain… Add charts. Anywhere. Not restricted by existing atlas/construction Questions to answer: Chart specification? Chart function form?

6 6 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Applications Surface modeling, texture mapping Surface comparison, feature parameterization Sphere: environment maps, BRDFs Arbitrary chart placement Port existing tools (linear embedding functions, gradient descent algorithms, etc.) to any domain transparently Adaptive parameterization

7 7 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Outline Spherical domain Defining Adding charts Building embedding function (surface Torus, n-holed tori domains Torus: Tiled plane N-holed: Tiled plane, sort-of

8 8 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Atlas from mesh Embedded sketchVertex chartsSketch Surface Embed mesh in domain 1-1 correspondence Specifies both chart locations and chart embeddings

9 9 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html In contrast… Approaches presented earlier created abstract manifold from scratch Specify transition functions/overlaps Chart functions derived Charts exactly match mesh connectivity This approach Define chart functions Transition functions/overlaps are derived Charts loosely tied to mesh connectivity Both approaches fit geometry to subdivision surface

10 10 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Representing a sphere Representing points x 2 +y 2 +z 2 -1 = 0 Average/blend points Project back onto sphere (Gnomonic projection) Valid in ½ hemisphere Barycentric coordinates in spherical triangles Interpolate in triangle, project Line segments (arcs)

11 11 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Charts Stereographic projection Sketch mesh charts Circles to circles Requires rotation to center at arbitrary point Both C  Images: mathworld.wolfram.com

12 12 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Charts, adjusting Raw projections M D don’t provide much control Map to consistent chart shape (e.g., unit disk) Add additional “warp” function M W Projective transform (scale, translate, rotate) Still C 

13 13 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Overlaps and transition functions Overlaps Chart inverse functions well-defined, C , over chart range/disk (but not over entire plane) Coverage of chart determined by inverse map Disk->sphere Transition functions Defined by composition  (  -1 (s,t))

14 14 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Sketch atlas Properties Charts must cover sphere Overlap substantially with neighbors But not non-adjacent elements Relate to sketch mesh One chart for each vertex, edge, face Vertex: centered, overlaps ½ adjacent edges/faces Edge: covers end points, centroids of adjacent faces Face: covers interior of face Vertex charts Face charts Edge charts

15 15 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Creating embedding Mesh in 1-1 correspondence with sphere Subdivide original 3D mesh and mesh embedded in domain Keeps correspondences Fit chart embedding to corresponding part of subdivision surface

16 16 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Blend and embedding functions Blend: Uniform B-Spline basis function “spun” around origin Produces smallest second derivative variations Embed: C 6 polynomial No problems with end-conditions, skew Continuity: Continuity of blend functions (everything else is C  )

17 17 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Advantages Transition functions are “free”, C  No difficulties with co-cycle condition Can add additional charts anywhere Embedding function provides a natural mechanism for “masking out” original surface Mask out blend functions C k surface pasting with no constraints Re-parameterization is easy Take out old charts and add new ones

18 18 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Disadvantages Need to make/find canonical manifold for each genus May prove difficult for higher dimensions Requires “tweaking” of chart construction to get “nice” overlaps, guaranteed coverage Regularization of embedded sketch mesh Heuristics/optimizations for chart construction Warping function

19 19 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Torus Similar to circle example Repeat in both s and t: [0,2  ) X [0,2  ) Chart is defined by projective transform Care with wrapping (0,0) (2  2  ) X X

20 20 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Torus, associated edges Cut torus open to make a square Two loops (yellow one around, grey one through) Each loop is 2 edges on square Glue edges together Loops meet at a point

21 21 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html N-Holed tori Similar to torus – cut open to make a 4N-sided polygon Two loops per hole (one around, one through) Glue two polygon edges to make loop Loops meet at a point Polygon vertices glue to same point Front Back a a b b c c d d

22 22 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Hyperbolic geometry Why is my polygon that funny shape? Need corners of polygon to each have 2  / 4N degrees (so they fill circle when glued together) Tile hyperbolic disk with 4N-sided polygons

23 23 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Hyperbolic geometry Edges are circle arcs; circles meet boundary at right angles Linear fractional transforms Equivalent to matrix operations in Euclidean geometry, e.g., rotate, translate, scale Invertible Chart: Use a Linear fractional transform to map point(s) to origin, then apply warp function Need to ensure we use correct copy in chart function

24 24 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Summary There are some manifolds we use often Sphere, tori, circle, plane, S 3 (quaternions) Construct a general-purpose manifold + atlas + chart creation + transition functions Now can use any tools that operate in R n Use same tools for all topologies Can build charts at any scale, anywhere Not dictated by initial construction/sketch

25 25 Siggraph 2005, 8/1/2005 www.cs.wustl.edu/~cmg/Siggraph2005/siggraph.html Open questions Boundaries Function discontinuities Changing topologies Establishing correspondences between existing surfaces and canonical manifold Parameterization (next section) Where and how to place charts


Download ppt "1 Adding charts anywhere Assume a cow is a sphere Cindy Grimm and John Hughes, “Parameterizing n-holed tori”, Mathematics of Surfaces X, 2003 Cindy Grimm,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google