1. http://www.yamanaka.ics.keio.org http://www.pilab.org Overview of GMPLS interworking trials in Japan and NICT Kei-han-na GMPLS E-NNI trials Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka Photonic Internet Lab. and Keio University

2. Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

3. 199920002001200220032004 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Domestic backbone traffic demand 10k users Traffic Volume (Gb/s) ISDN ADSL 8M ADSL 12M (Year) Broad band 1.5 ADSL Traffic Volume Broad band users FTTH 100M 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ADSL 24M ADSL 40M

4. Trend on Optical Switching network 200120052010 - Wavelength control Semi-permanent Dynamic Switching … … p-to-p WDM Transport OADM: Optical Add/Drop Multiplexer OXC: Optical Cross-connect WDM ring network OADM Photonic router OXC WDM Research Target Optical packet switch network １ 22 １１ 3 3 2 (Add / Drop) WDM Transport WDM mesh network Flexibility Dynamic & cost reduction Reliability Throughput (Year) Optical Burst Switch Network GMPLS

5. Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara PIL is research consortium by 9 members What and Where is PIL and Kei-han-na ? Tokyo 1964 Sapporo 1972 Nagano 1998 Kei-han-na area PIL (Photonic Internet Lab) (NICT KDDI NTT 7 venders etc.)

6. Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

7. Photonic-GMPLS Leading Edge Code Research Consortium : Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) : Member Companies Keio University N ippon T elegraph and T elephone Corporation NEC Corporation Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Electric Company Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Hitachi, Ltd. IP infusion

8. PIL Organization PIL member Companies Photonic Internet Lab. Technical testing of the leading-edge protocol codes developed in each company Technical arguments on the investigation and discussion of members' standardization proposals and the exploration of technical themes. Standardization Strategy WG Technical Test WG PIL governance Steering Committee Oki Furukawa Electric Mitsubishi Electric NECHitachi Fujitsu NTT Keio Univ. IP infusion

9. PIL activity framework PIL Proposing leading edge technology Leading-edge code Implemented ITU-T Implementation agreement by PIL Standard (RFC, IA) Contribution from PIL Testing leading edge code OIF IETF Member A Running Code by A Contribution from A Merging A, B and C Contribution from B Contribution from C Member B Running Code by B Member C Running Code by C

10. Topics 1: Multi-layer (Multi-region), Multi-vender, and Multi-route GMPLS operation trial (2003) Interoperability test of GMPLS control systems. 5 members, 8 types of equipment controllers. NTT NEC Mitsubishi NEC Packet TDM Wavelength Fiber Fujitsu Furukawa Route A Route B Mitsubishi

11. Topics 2: MPLS/GMPLS interworking Migration from conventional MPLS NW to GMPLS NW Advertising GMPLS resources to conventional MPLS path Routing … FA-LSP (GMPLS) >> Opaque or Router LSA (MPLS) Signaling … Tunneling and Switching method draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-06.txt (July 2005) G8 G7(adv) G3(adv) G1(adv) G5(adv) G6(adv) R3 R1 R2 G9 G2 G4 GMPLS topology view IP topology view G3 G1G2 G7 G6 G5 G9G8 G4 R3 R1 R2 G1G3 G7 G6 G5 GMPLS Network

12. MPLS2003 PIL - MPLS/GMPLS interworking demonstration LSC TDM NTT NEC GMPLS PSC TDM LSC 40.6 40.7 40.4 40.3 40.2 Node 1 MPLS MPLS Nod e 7 Node 8 40.5 MPLS FurukawaMitsubishiFurukawa PSC Node 2 Nod e 3 LSC Node 4 NTT MPLS Nod e 5 Node 6 LSC PSC MPLS

13. Topics ３ : GMPLS Restoration 1+1 Protection Hot standby for Fast restoration 1:1 Shared restoration Pre-determined backup route but resources are shared with other route …High-network utilization. draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-0x.txt by NTT NEC Mitsubishi Fujitsu Furukawa Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networks Path1 Ingress1Egress1 Backup2 Path2 Ingress2 Egress2 Backup1 Shared resource Extra-traffic

14. HDTV Video on GMPLS network @ JGN Symposium 2004 Multi-vender Gbit/sec GMPLS network GMPLS signaling and routing (OSPF, RSVP-TE) Super High-definition (SHD) digital cinema transfer Automatic restoration MPLS/GMPLS interworking Video Conference Video Conference MPLS router IP/MPLS NW １ （ Metro ） MPLS router IP/MPLS NW ２ （ Metro ） GMPLS NW （ Backbone ） OC48 GbE TDM Cross connect TDM Cross connect GbE SHD Lambda Cross connect Lambda Cross connect OC192 OC48 Signal Control HIKARI Wavelength NW Large capacity IP TDM NW High-definition digital cinema OC192 Lambda Cross connect Broadband application OC48 /GbE GMPLS router Lambda Cross connect Lambda Cross connect HIKARI router OC48 /GbE GbE HIKARI router GMPLS router

15. Contribution example to international sanitation Oct 2004 IP/MPLS - GMPLS interworking in support of IP/MPLS to GMPLS migration draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-gmpls-ip-interworking-04.txt03.txt02.txt01.txt 00.txt Requirements for GMPLS-based multi-region and multi-layer networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-00.txt Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Protocol Extensions for Multi-Region Networks (MRN) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-00.txt draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-extensions-00.txt July 2004 Requirements for Path Computation Element in GMPLS and IP/MPLS Networks draft-oki-pce-gmpls-req-00.txt draft-oki-pce-gmpls-req-00.txt June 2004 Analysis of Misconnection Scenarios in GMPLS Networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-misconnection-analysis-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-misconnection-analysis-00.txt April 2004 Generalized Traffic Engineering Protocol draft-oki-ccamp-gtep-00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-gtep-00.txt Feb. 2004 Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networks draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt03.txt02.txt 00.txt Extra class LSP service using protecting resources in GMPLS networks draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-02.txt 01.txt | 00.txt draft-pil-ccamp-extra-lsp-02.txt01.txt00.txt Generalized MPLS Architecture for Multi-Region Networks draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt | 03.txt | 02.txt | 00.txt draft-vigoureux-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-04.txt03.txt02.txt 00.txt Oct. 2003 Control plane architecture in GMPLS networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-cplane-architecture-00.txt draft-shiomoto-ccamp-cplane-architecture-00.txt Feb. 2003 Extensions to LMP for Flooding-based Fault Notification draft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext-00.txt draft-soumiya-lmp-fault-notification-ext-00.txt RSVP extensions for gmpls restoration signaling draft-shimano-imajuku-gmpls-restoration-00.txt draft-shimano-imajuku-gmpls-restoration-00.txt Fault Notification Protocol for GMPLS-Based Recovery draft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol-02.txt | draft-rabbat-fault-notification-protocol-02.txt Signaling reverse-directional LSP in generalized MPLS draft-matsuura-reverse-lsp-02.txt | 01.txt | 00.txt draft-matsuura-reverse-lsp-02.txt01.txt00.txt Optical Network Failure Recovery Requirements draft-czezowski-optical-recovery-reqs-01.txt | 00.txt draft-czezowski-optical-recovery-reqs-01.txt00.txt Nov. 2002 Requirements for adding optical support to GSMPv3 draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-04.txt | draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-04.txt Oct. 2002 draft-vigoureux-ccamp-gmpls-architecture-hpn-00.txt Path Quality Verification over an All-Optical Network draft-seno-path-quality-verification-00.txt draft-seno-path-quality-verification-00.txt June 2002 Generalized MPLS architecture for multi-region networks Multi-area multi-layer traffic engineering using hierarchical LSPs in GMPLS networks draft-shiomoto-ccamp-multiarea-te-01.txt | draft-shiomoto-ccamp-multiarea-te-01.txt Upstream label set support in RSVT-TE extensions draft-oki-ccamp-upstream-labelset-00.txt draft-oki-ccamp-upstream-labelset-00.txt Requirements for using RSVP-TE in GMPLS signaling draft-matsuura-gmpls-rsvp-requirements-01.txt | 00.txt draft-matsuura-gmpls-rsvp-requirements-01.txt00.txt Multilayer routing using multilayer switch capable LSRs draft-imajuku-ml-routing-02.txt | 00.txt draft-imajuku-ml-routing-02.txt00.txt May 2002 Extensions to OSPF-TE for supporting shared mesh restoration draft-yagyu-gmpls-shared-restoration-routing-00.txt draft-yagyu-gmpls-shared-restoration-routing-00.txt Apr. 2002 OSPF Extensions in Support of Transport Plane Sub-networks draft-maeno-ospf-optical-subnet-00.txt draft-maeno-ospf-optical-subnet-00.tx Feb. 2002 Extensions to RSVP-TE for Supporting Multiple Protection and Restoration Types draft-suemura-gmpls-restoration-signaling-00.txt draft-suemura-gmpls-restoration-signaling-00.txt Requirements of optical link-state information for traffic engineering draft-oki-ipo-optlink-req-00.txt draft-oki-ipo-optlink-req-00.txt Dec. 2001 Protection of Hierarchical LSPs draft-suemura-protection-hierarchy-00.txt draft-suemura-protection-hierarchy-00.txt [Reference] Generalized MPLS Recovery Functional Specification draft-bala-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt draft-bala-gmpls-recovery-functional-01.txt Analysis of Generalized MPLS-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration) draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-03.txt draft-papadimitriou-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-analysis-03.txt Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for GMPLS draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-01.txt draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-terminology-01.txt

16. Overview of iPOP2005 Sponsored by ISOCORE and PIL Feb. 21 ・ 22, 2005 iPOP2005 General Chair Tomonori Aoyama, University of Tokyo Bijan Jabbari, ISOCORE

17. http://pilab.org/ipop2005/ iPOP2005 （ 2005.2.21-22)

18. Overview of iPOP 2005 Presentation sessions 1 Opening session 3 Special sessions (Invited) 4 Technical sessions (Refereed) Showcase Next Generation networking technologies for IP and Optical networks Trans-Pacific demonstration between ISOCORE site (VA, USA) and iPOP site (Tokyo, JPN) Multiple carriers/vendors ’ equipments Exhibition 20 exhibitors

19. iPOP 2005 Sponsors Sponsored by founded by 6 vendors and 1 service provider in 2002, is promoting R&D on next-generation photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. is the leading technology validation lab in the next generation IP and optical networking. Its goal is to advance internetworking through technology validation and product verification and to promote development and rapid deployment of innovative networking technologies. Cooperate with is a non-profit organization contributing to the progress of info-communication technology to realize all optical ultra-high-speed networks. Private Line Provided by

20. Exhibitors Gold (11) Silver (8) Bronze

21. iPOP Showcase Network GMPLS network in Japan MPLS network MPLS network Furukawa NTT Fujitsu Juniper KDDI FurukawaFujitsu NEC Hitachi NTT Mitsubishi Electric NTT TOYO Cisco Juniper Avici GMPLS network in USA NTT-AT Juniper Sycamore Furukawa KDDI Cisco Avici NEC NTT Fujitsu ＰＣ Ｅ ＧＴＥＰ Sycamore Ethernet SONET/SDH Virtual data link Protocol viewer

22. Participants of iPOP2005 (Pre-registration base) Government, Institute, 17 Academia, 22 Carrier, 113 Vendor, 223 Press, Consultant, 4 Others, 19 Total, 398

23. iPOP2005 at Tokyo

24. CFP iPOP2006 Presentation, Exhibition, and Interop Showcase Dead Line: Feb. 01, 2007 June 22-23 (tentative), 2006, at Tokyo JAPAN Sponsored by PIL, ISOCORE, PIF Details will be appeared at http://pilab.org/

25. Future Target of PIL Plan 2 Contribution with major overseas vendors * Consideration of the plans -Individual test with major overseas vendors (2003) -PIL joined in ISOCORE as group member (2004-) - Sister site of PIL with ISOCORE (2004-) Service test phase (2005-) Overseas company 7 Domestic companies Plan 1 Field network test *Consideration of the field tests - NTT Musashino － Yokosuka -NICT Keihannna － Koganei - ISOCORE D.C.—PIL Tokyo Lab test phaseField test phase (2004) Activity of PIL 2003 Extension of Testing protocol Confirmation of the running and reliability on equipment Confirmation of the running and reliability on NW PIF Asia ISOCORE USA NICT Kei-han-na

26. Outline Introduction Introduction GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan GMPLS network research consortiums in Japan PIL: Photonic Internet Labs. Multi-layer, Multi-route & Multi-vender experiment MPLS / GMPLS Interworking Protection and restoration iPOP2005 GMPLS showcase and workshop Largest open interworking testing event in ASIA NICT KEI-HAN-NA open lab activities GMPLS E-NNI interworking Conclusion

27. Where is Kei-han-na ? Kei-han-na is located over three prefectures in Japan Kansai area. Kyoto, Osaka, and Nara Tokyo 1964 Sapporo 1972 Nagano 1998 Kei-han-na area

28. Kei-han-na Info-Communication Open Laboratory Overview The open laboratory was established at 2003 with the objective of carrying out research and development based studies. Equipped with research facilities including the high-performance network technology. Facilities are available to universities, manufacturers, research laboratories, venture companies, the local governments, etc. merge research and development and contribute for providing personnel training to specialists. Creating new industries and services Human resource development

29. Organization of the Research Promotion Council of Kei-han-na Open Laboratory Operation and Research Committee Planning and Public Relation Subcommittee High Performance Network Subcommittee Interoperability Working Group Photonic Working Group Grid and Application Working Group Individual Projects Human Communications Subcommittee Network Robot Subcommittee

30. Interoperability WG (IWG) members NTT, NTT Communications KDDI, KDDI R&D Labs. NEC Furukawa Network Solutions Fujitsu, Fujitsu Lab. Mitsubishi Electric Hitachi, Hitachi Communications Technologies Anritsu Keio University Prof. Naoaki Yamanaka National Institute of Information and Communication Technology (NICT) 14 member organizations

31. Service Provider A Admin Domain UNI E-NNI (b) Service Provider B Admin Domain Domain A1Domain A2 E-NNI (a) I-NNI Provider A has divided network into multiple control domains (e.g., vendor, geographic, technology, business unit, etc.) Provider B’s network is a single control domain User-Network Interface (UNI): operations between user and service provider control domains External Network-to-Network Interface (E-NNI): inter-control domain operation. (a) multi-domain operation for a single service provider (b) multi-domain operation among different service providers Internal Network-to-Network Interface (I-NNI): intra-control domain operation User Domain firewall L2/L3 Load Balancer Load Balancer Kei-han-na target (Interface between ISPs/Carriers)

32. Multi-layer network environment PSC UNI, L2SC UNI, TDM UNI, LSC UNI, and FSC UNI are possible. FSC LSC TDM PSC UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-A In the photonic network era, which layer becomes a border layer ?

33. Multi-layer/multi-carrier GMPLS network OXC/PXC is a border node. FSC LSC TDM PSC FSC LSC TDM PSC UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) UNI (PSC) (TDM) (LSC) (FSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-A E-NNI (LSC) GMPLS Network for Carrier-B OXC/PXC

34. ● 20/10 Gbit/s backbone of OXC/wavelength multiplexing network ● 63 access points nationwide ● Connection with overseas ● We have built 2 optical test beds for inspection research NICT Kitakyusyu IT Center Kanazawa Otemachi NICT Keihanna Center NICT Koganei NICT Kashima RC Sendai Sapporo 1G Nagano Kochi Nagoya Fukuoka Dojima Okinawa Okayama NICT Kobe Kanazawa Fukuoka Dojima Okayama Otemachi Kitakyusyu IT Center Tsukuba Kashima Tsukuba RC Otemachi RC NICT Keihanna Center Optical NW test bed possible to testify physically 1G 10G NICT Tsukuba RC Dojima 10G 1G 10G (1Gx8) 1G 10G 1G 10G (1Gx8) 10G (1Gx8) 1G 10G 10Gx2 10G (1Gx8) 10G base Architecture of R&D network: JGN II NW-A : Test bed network for Tb/s class communication NW-A : R&D for network operation and management GMPLS inter-operability technology

35. OXC Router DojimaOtemachiNICT Koganei IWG XC-B IWG R-1 KDDI R-1 GbE STM-16 STM-64 C-Plane NW on JGN II 14 organizations from industry, university and government GMPLS Global Interoperability Verification Consortium collaboration working in Kei-han-na Open Laboratory IWG XC-C IWG R-2 NTT R-2 KDDI PXC NTT PXC Fujitsu PXC Mitsubishi PXC Furukawa R-1 Hitachi R-2 IWG XC-A KDDI R-2 NTT R-1 Fujitsu R-1 NEC XC Hitachi R-1 NICT Kei-han-na

36. Conclusions Target for GMPLS, next generation IP backbone protocol. Universal control Scalable service Low-cost universal backbone The Photonic Internet Lab. (PIL) was founded Autumn 2002 by 9 companies (7 venders, 1 service provider and 1 university) for realizing new photonic network control protocols based on photonic technologies for managed networks. The Japanese government is supporting PIL. NICT Kei-han-na Consortium is targeting GMPLS E-NNI protocol. It is demonstrated at MPLS 2005 booth.