Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst peter_j_goodwin@amat.com Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager surendra_meduri@amat.com

2 About Applied Materials Company Profile Applied Materials, Inc. (*Nasdaq: AMAT) is the global leader in nanomanufacturing technology solutions with a broad portfolio of innovative equipment, service and software products for the fabrication of semiconductor chips, flat panel displays, solar photovoltaic cells, flexible electronics and energy efficient glass. At Applied Materials, we apply nanomanufacturing technology to improve the way people live. Founded in 1967, Applied Materials creates and commercializes the nanomanufacturing technology that helps produce virtually every semiconductor chip and flat panel displays in the world. The company recently entered the market for equipment to produce solar arrays and energy efficient glass. Applied Materials service products improve yield enhancement and increase nanomanufacturing productivity. To support our customers, Applied Materials employs approximately 14,500 people throughout the world. In fiscal year 2007, Applied Materials recorded revenues of approximately U.S. $9.73 billion. For more information visit www.amat.com

3 Introduction  Applied Materials has a complex multisite implementation of TeamCenter Engineering to ensure optimum performance for the user, but repeated transfers between sites can sometimes cause data integrity issues.  A number of users engaged in cross site collaboration were spending a significant amount of time transferring files back and forth between sites.

4 Applied Materials Site Configuration Multisite Architecture with sites in: Santa Clara, CA Austin, TX Boise, ID Xi’An, China Bangalore, India Users in Santa Clara would begin a design, then that evening a designer in Bangalore would pull the design to their local site so they could continue to work on it, then the original designer would pull it back to Santa Clara and so on

5 Issues  Traditional Remote Desktop solutions such as RDC are fine for modifying structures in PSE and other non- graphically intense actions, but lack the graphics response required for effective CAD use.  Web based solutions such as eMeeting also lack the graphics performance necessary for effective collaboration.

6 Proof of Concept Details  In the second half of 2007 Applied Materials conducted a Proof of Concept evaluation of HP’s Blade Workstations and Remote Graphics Software for use in the remote access of CAD data from TeamCenter Engineering  8 Blade Workstations were installed in a Test Lab adjacent to the main Data Center in Austin, TX which houses the TeamCenter servers, along with a virtual server running software to manage user access to the blades. This allowed the workstations to take advantage of the Gigabit network within the datacenter.

7 What are Blade Workstations? They function as remote workstations, users log in remotely via a custom graphics client, all applications are executed on the blade, with the users system acting as a graphics terminal.

8 Blade Workstation Configuration  Dual Xeon 5160 processors @ 3.0 GHz  4 GB Memory  nVidia Quadro FX 1600M Graphics  OS – Windows XP SP2  Installed applications  TeamCenter Portal 9.1.3  UG-NX 3  HP Remote Graphics Sender

9 HP Remote Graphics Software (RGS) RGS uses proprietary graphics algorithms in conjunction with dedicated graphics hardware to provide the graphics performance required for CAD applications.

10 Session Allocation Manager  Session Allocation Manager (SAM) is a software application run on a separate server that controls access to the Blade Workstations. Users log in thru a small client program installed on their PCs.

11 Workstation Management  Workstations can be assigned to groups, and users assigned to that group will be routed to the next available workstation in the group. This allows the administrator to ensure availability within groups while reducing the number of workstations required.  Users can also be assigned to a specific workstation, effectively removing that workstation from the pool, but guaranteeing the user always has a workstation available.

12 Functionality Testing  Testing performed in a lab environment in Santa Clara, CA using 3 standard computer configurations deployed at Applied Materials (2 desktop, 1 laptop)  Laptop also tested from an external location using VPN Machine Specifications Desktop – Dual 2.13 Ghz Core 2 Duo E6400, 2GB, Nvidia Quadro4 FX1400 128MB Engineering – Dual 2.33 GHz Xeon 5140, 2GB, Nvidia Quadro 4 FX1400 128MB Laptop – 2.0 Ghz Core 2 Duo T7200, 2 GB, ATI Mobility Fire GL V5250 128MB

13 Measurements  Log in time  3D Model load time  Small model – 40 parts  Medium model – 344 parts  Large model – 689 parts

14 Results All tests results are the average of at least three tests performed on different days and at different hours of the day. Santa Clara to Santa Clara Santa Clara to Austin Santa Clara to Austin Blade Santa Clara to Santa Clara Santa Clara to Austin Santa Clara to Austin Blade DesktopLaptop Login27s9m46s21s27s9m15s18s Open - Small1m10s8m30s1m21s1m35s6m08s1m05s Open - Medium4m40m52s3m53s4m42s40m53s3m17s Open - Large5m55s1h22m4m49s6m31s1h27m4m22s Engineering DesktopLaptop VPN Login18s9m36s26s5m35s3m32s19s Open - Small36s7m49s38s6m52s9m13s1m17s Open - Medium3m15s40m15s1m46s54m01s1h04m2m58s Open - Large5m25s1h19m3m17s1h40m1h 53m4m 17

15 Conclusions  HP Blade Workstations provide login and model load times as well as graphics performance equivalent to local access for the following scenarios  Users who need to move between locations.  Users can disconnect from the blade session without logging off, and reconnect again at their destination.  Users assigned to locations remote from the TeamCenter server.  Users working remotely via VPN.

16 Open Issues  UG-NX Customizations are not transferred from user to Blade.  Printer mappings do not carry over from user to Blade.  Some USB devices are not initially recognized, and must be disconnected and reconnected.  Older hardware requires BIOS update to fully utilize remote capabilities.

17 Next Steps  A Pilot involving 32 Blades is currently underway.  Initial User response has been very encouraging.  A Proof of Concept demonstrating Design Supplier collaboration will be starting shortly.  Will allow designers to collaborate with outside experts without exporting design information beyond the firewall.

18 18


Download ppt "1 Blade Workstation Proof of Concept and Pilot Peter J. Goodwin - Software Analyst Surendra Meduri - Technical Manager"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google