Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Masaki Hirabaru CRL, Japan APAN Engineering Team Meeting APAN 2003 in Busan, Korea August 27, 2003 Common Performance Measurement Platform.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Masaki Hirabaru CRL, Japan APAN Engineering Team Meeting APAN 2003 in Busan, Korea August 27, 2003 Common Performance Measurement Platform."— Presentation transcript:

1 Masaki Hirabaru CRL, Japan APAN Engineering Team Meeting APAN 2003 in Busan, Korea August 27, 2003 Common Performance Measurement Platform

2 Real Situations MIT Haystack – CRL Kashima e-VLBI Experiment on June 27, 2003 to measure UT1-UTC in 24 hours –41.54 GB CRL  MIT 107 Mbps (~50 mins) 41.54 GB MIT  CRL 44.6 Mbps (~120 mins) –RTT ~220 ms, UDP throughput 300-400 Mbps However TCP ~6-8 Mbps (per session, tuned) –BBFTP with 5 x 10 TCP sessions to gain performance HUT – CRL Kashima Gigabit VLBI Experiment -RTT ~325 ms, UDP throughput ~70 Mbps However TCP ~2 Mbps (as is), ~10 Mbps (tuned) -Netants (5 TCP sessions with ftp stream restart extension) They need high-speed / real-time / reliable / long-haul high performance data transfer.

3 Purpose Ensure ~1 Gbps end-to-end performance in high bandwidth-delay product networks –to support for networked science applications –to help operations in finding a bottleneck –to evaluate advanced transport protocols (e.g. Tsunami, SABUL, TFRC, HSTCP, FAST, XCP, ikob)

4 Kwangju Busan 2.5G Fukuoka Korea 2.5G x1 KOREN Taegu Daejon 2.5G + 40G 0.6G1Gx2 QGPOP Seoul XP Genkai XP Kitakyushu Tokyo XP CRL Kashima 0.1G Fukuoka Japan 250km 1,000km 2.5G + 1G x2 TransPAC 10,000km 4,000km Los Angeles Chicago New York MIT Haystack HUT 10G 1G APII/JGN Abilene 0.1G? Helsinki 2.4G Stockholm 0.6G 2.4G GEANT Nordunet funet CRL Koganei 1G 7,000km Network Configuration (incl. near future plan)

5 Proposal Place a “good” PC box for performance measurement at each NOC / POP as well as experiment sites (hop-by-hop and end-to- end) Advanced rate-based / window-based transports (kernel may be modified) Common measurement method / tool (iperf?) Monitor for TCP / UDP protocol behavior (tcpdump & tcptrace, packet loss detector) Combine with ping, traceroute, routing stats Share the boxes and develop scheduler to avoid duplicate tests Need a consensus to put a strong pressure on our networks (?)

6 Examples Data Unavailable From Tokyo XP to KOREN Busan Blue line: UDP (loss < 1%)  better way Green area: TCP (with proper window size) Traffic Between Genkai XP and KOREN Busan Test stopped

7 Questions? See http://www2.crl.go.jp/ka/radioastro/index.html for VLBI


Download ppt "Masaki Hirabaru CRL, Japan APAN Engineering Team Meeting APAN 2003 in Busan, Korea August 27, 2003 Common Performance Measurement Platform."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google