Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DAU Midwest Fall Offsite 10 Sept 2009 DAU Transformation 2.0 LAMP DoD/DAU Knowledge Management/Sharing Your KM Team ’05 ’06 ’07.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DAU Midwest Fall Offsite 10 Sept 2009 DAU Transformation 2.0 LAMP DoD/DAU Knowledge Management/Sharing Your KM Team ’05 ’06 ’07."— Presentation transcript:

1 DAU Midwest Fall Offsite 10 Sept 2009 DAU Transformation 2.0 LAMP DoD/DAU Knowledge Management/Sharing Your KM Team ’05 ’06 ’07

2 First Set of Questions?

3 Integrated Baseline Review System IntegrationSystem DemonstrationLow-Rate Initial Production Defense Acquisition System (event driven) Planning, Programming, Budgeting, & Execution Process (biennial calendar driven) Military Departments & Defense Agencies Cost Integrated Defense Acquisition, Technology, & Logistics Life Cycle Management Framework FOC IOC Full-Rate Production/Deployment MS B System Development & Demonstration Phase Operations & Support Phase Post Deployment Performance Review Three DOD Decision Support Systems Effective Interaction is Essential Sustainment National Military Strategy FYDP updated ISSUES Budget Committees Congress DoD Budget On Year Off Year POM/Budget Formulation PCP/BCP Prep Final PBDs Actual Costs Engineering Cost Estimation Methods Parametric Analogy Technology Development PhaseConcept Refinement Phase National Security Strategy DoD Testimony Strategic Planning Guidance Off Year Optional Fiscal Guidance President’s Budget to Congress Joint Programming Guidance Off Year Optional White House OSD & Joint Staff OMB SLRG Reviews Joint Planning Document PBD Cycle PMO Budget Estimate PMO POM Input Full Funding in FYDP CDD MS C POM/Budget Submit PCP/BCP Submit FYDP updated MS A The Milestone Decision Authority may authorize entry into the acquisition process at any point, consistent with phase specific entrance criteria and statutory requirements Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) AoA Plan System Threat Assessment Information Support Plan CPD Service/JROC Validation & Approval J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Cert. Validated and approved CDD and CPD for each increment of an evolutionary acquisition Oversight & Review Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Net-Ready KPP KPPs CPD System Threat Assessment Information Support Plan Service/JROC Validation & Approval J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Cert. Net-Ready KPP Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) Clinger-Cohen Act - Compliance (all IT) - Certification (MAIS) ADM Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB MDA ADM DAB/ ITAB MDA ADM Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB MDAAPB ADM Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB MDA ADM Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB MDAAPB ADM Exit Criteria Met DAB/ ITAB MDAAPB MBI Allocation Apportionment Affordability Assessment CARD (Designated Programs) POE CCA ICE Affordability Assessment POE CCA ICE Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) Contracting Acq Plan Source Selection Plan Draft RFP Acq Plan Draft RFP Source Selection Plan Production & Deployment Phase Increment III BC DRR FRP Increment II BC DRR FRP KPPs Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System VCJCS Oversight CJCSI 3170.01D Defense Acquisition System USD(AT&L) Oversight DoDD 5000.1 Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution DEPSECDEF Oversight MID 913 Purpose of LRIP: Establish Production Base Ramp to Production Rate Produce systems for IOT&E Low-Rate Initial Production Systems FCA Prototypes/ Engineering Dev Models Technology Development Strategy Program Strategy Cost, schedule & performance goals & exit criteria for first tech demo Test Plan Acquisition Strategy Program Structure Acquisition Approach Capability Needs T&E Considerations Risk Management Resource Management Life-Cycle Considerations Business Considerations System Development & Demonstration Contract Integrated Baseline Review LRIP Contract AoA Best Materiel Approach(es) Draft ver. 4.7. May 21, 2004 Study Contracts Initiate Evolutionary Acquisition StrategyEvolutionary Acquisition Strategy Refine initial concept. Develop Technology Development Strategy Reduce technology risk and determine appropriate set of technologies to integrate into a full system. Develop a system or increment of capability; reduce integration and manufacturing risk; ensure operational supportability; reduce logistics footprint; implement human systems integration; design for producibility; ensure affordability and protection of critical program information; and demonstrate system integration, interoperability, safety, and utility. Achieve operational capability that satisfies mission needs. Execute a support program that meets operational support performance requirements and sustains the system in the most cost-effective manner over its total life cycle. Dispose of the system in the most cost-effective manner at the end of its useful life. Tech Demos Preliminary Integrated Architecture Acq Plan Draft RFP Source Selection Plan Technology Development Contract Supports O&M Budget Review Acq Plan Draft RFP Source Selection Plan In-Service Review OctoberApril / May August September - November October - November November December January February (1st Monday) February - September DoD Appeals Disposal This chart is a classroom aid for Defense Acquisition University students. It provides a notional illustration of the interfaces among the three major decision support systems used to develop, produce, and field a system for national defense. Defense acquisition is a complex process, with many more activities than shown here, and many concurrent processes that cannot be properly displayed on a two-dimensional chart. Supporting information is on the back of this chart. For more detailed information see the Acquisition, Technology & Logistics Knowledge Sharing System (http://akss.dau.mil). System Performance Spec Prototypes/ Engineering Dev Models Initial Production Baseline CARD – Cost Analysis Requirements Description CCA – Component Cost Assessment ICE – Independent Cost Estimate MAIS – Major Automated Information System POE – Program Office Estimate RDT&E – Research, Development, Test & Evaluation Cost Acronyms BCP – Budget Change Proposals FYDP – Future Years Defense Program MBI – Major Budget Issue OMB – Office of Management & Budget PBD – Program Budget Decision PCP – Program Change Proposals PDM – Program Decision Memorandum POM – Program Objectives Memorandum SLRG – Senior Leadership Review Group Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution Acronyms Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System (need driven) ADM – Acquisition Decision Memorandum AoA – Analysis of Alternatives APB – Acquisition Program Baseline CD – Concept Decision DAB – Defense Acquisition Board DRR – Design Readiness Review FOC – Full Operational Capability FRPDR – Full-Rate Production Decision Review IOC – Initial Operational Capability ITAB – Information Technology Acquisition Board LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MAIS – Major Automated Information System MDA – Milestone Decision Authority Oversight & Review Acronyms RFP – Request for Proposal Joint Capabilities Integration & Development System - Acronyms CDD – Capability Development Document CJCSI – Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction CPD – Capability Production Document DOTMLPF – Doctrine, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities DAB – Defense Acquisition Board ICD – Initial Capabilities Document IOC – Initial Operational Capability JROC – Joint Requirements Oversight Council KPP – Key Performance Parameter Draft CDD AoA updated Full-Rate Production Systems Major Products Appropriation Committees Authorization Committees Authorization/ Appropriation Acts Passed PDM(s) Appropriated Funds To Support Contracts FOC Affordability Assessment POE CCA ICE Economic Analysis (MAIS Only) CARD (Designated Programs) Post Production Software Support Contracts Sustainment Contracts Operations & Maintenance Types of Funds RDT&E – Management & Support RDT&E – Adv Component Dev & Prototypes RDT&E – Systems Development & Demonstration Decision Points/Milestones CD DRR FRP DR Acquisition Strategy Program Structure Acquisition Approach Capability Needs T&E Considerations Risk Management Resource Management Life-Cycle Considerations Business Considerations Acquisition Strategy Program Structure Acquisition Approach Capability Needs T&E Considerations Risk Management Resource Management Life-Cycle Considerations Business Considerations Procurement AoA updated n/a MAIS AoA MAIS only Preferred System Concept Final Production Baseline ICD Post Independent Analysis Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis Joint Operations Concepts DOTMLPFDOTMLPF Joint Operating Concepts Joint Functional Concepts Joint Integrating Concepts Integrated Architectures DoD Strategic Guidance Functional Solution Analysis DOTMLPF Changes (CJCSI 3180) Service/JROC Validation & Approval Materiel Changes (CJCSI 3170) Ideas for Materiel Approaches Analysis of Materiel Approaches Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative N RDT&E – Advanced Technology Development Integrated Baseline Review Production Contract Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture Threshold/objective tradeoffs – Revised Performance Attributes Joint Functional Concept Joint Integrating Concept Integrated Architecture FOT&E LFT&E Waiver (if appropriate) Technical Systems Engineering Test & Evaluation Supportability Analyze/Assess Concepts Versus Defined User Needs Develop Concept Performance (& Constraints) Definition & Verification Objectives Interpret User Needs, Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Decompose Concept Perf into Functional Definition & Verification Objectives Assess/Analyze Concept System Versus Functional Capabilities Decompose Concept Functional Definition into Component Concepts/ Assessment Objectives Develop Component Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers Assess/Analyze Enabling/Critical Components Versus Capabilities Interpret User Needs. Analyze Operational Capabilities & Environmental Constraints Demo & Validate Sys Concepts & Technology Maturity Versus Defined User Needs Develop System Perf (& Constraints) Spec & Enabling/Critical Tech &Verification Plan Develop Functional Definitions for Enabling/ Critical Technologies & Associated Verification Plan Demo System Functionality Versus Plan Decompose Functional Definitions into Critical Component Definition & Tech Verification Plan Demo Enabling/ Critical Technology Components Versus Plan Develop System Concepts, i.e., Enabling/Critical Technologies, Update Constraints & Cost/Risk Drivers TRR PDR SRR Interpret User Needs, Refine System Performance Specs & Environmental Constraints Develop System Functional Specs & System Verification Plan Evolve Functional Performance Specs into CI Functional (Design to) Specs and CI Verification Plan Evolve CI Functional Specs into Product (Build to) Documentation and Inspection Plan Fabricate, Assemble, Code to “Build-to” Documentation Integrated DT&E, LFT&E & EOAs Verify Performance Compliance to Specs Individual CI Verification DT&E SFR CDR INPUTS ICD AoA Plan Exit Criteria Alternative Maintenance & Logistics Concepts INPUTSOUTPUTS Trades Analyze Assess/Analyze Concept & Verify System Concept’s Performance Trades Analyze Demo/Model Integrated System Versus Performance Spec Trades Analyze System DT&E, LFT&E & OAs, Verify System Functionality & Constraints Compliance to Specs Monitor and Collect All Service Use Data Develop Corrective Action Analyze Data to Determine Root Cause Determine System Risk/ Hazard Severity Integrate & Test Corrective Action Implement and Field Process Change – Hardware/Support Materiel Change INPUTS Service Use Data User Feedback Failure Reports Discrepancy Reports SEP OUTPUTS Analyze Trades Assess Risk of Improved System Combined DT&E/OT&E/LFT&E Demonstrate System to Specified User Needs & Environmental Constraints ICD & Draft CDD Preferred Sys Concept Exit Criteria T&E Strategy Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies AoA SEP TDS Sys Performance Spec Exit Criteria Validated Sys Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements APB CDD SEP ISP TEMP Analyze Deficiencies To Determine Corrective Actions OUTPUTS Modify Configuration (Hardware/Software/Specs) To Correct Deficiencies Logistics & Technical Acronyms ASR – Alternative Systems Review BLRIP – Beyond Low Rate Initial Production CDR – Critical Design Review CI – Configuration Item DT&E – Developmental Test & Evaluation EDM – Engineering Development Model EOA – Early Operational Assessment ESOH – Environmental, Safety & Occupational Health FCA – Functional Configuration Audit FMECA – Failure Mode Effects & Criticality Analysis FOT&E – Follow-on Test & Evaluation FTA – Failure Tree Analysis IOT&E – Initial Operational Test & Evaluation ISR – In-Service Review JITC – Joint Interoperability Test Command LFT&E – Live Fire Test & Evaluation LCC – Life Cycle Costs LORA – Level of Repair Analysis LRIP – Low Rate Initial Production MTA – Maintenance Task Analysis OA – Operational Assessment OT&E – Operational Test & Evaluation OTRR – Operational Test Readiness Review PESHE – Programmatic Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Evaluation PDR – Preliminary Design Review PCA – Physical Configuration Audit PRR – Production Readiness Review PPP – Program Protection Plan RMS – Reliability, Maintainability & Supportability SEP – Systems Engineering Plan S&T – Science & Technology SFR – System Functional Review SRR – System Requirements Review STA – System Threat Assessment SVR – System Verification Review T&E – Test & Evaluation TEMP – Test & Evaluation Master Plan TDS – Technology Development Strategy TRA – Technology Readiness Assessment TRR – Test Readiness Review Least Acceptable Most Acceptable Recycle/Reuse Reprocessing Disposal Landfill Disposal Logistics/ Sustainment Test Results Exit Criteria APB CPD SEP TEMP Product Support Package INPUTS Operations & Sustainment Peacetime Training Joint Operations Crises Evaluate Product Support Capabilities Performance Based Agreements Business Case Analysis Product Support Integrator/ Product Support Provider LFTE Report to Congress BLRIP Report to Congress ACCDDRR FRPDR B Demonstrate Product Support Capability Footprint Reduction Supply Chain Management Product Support Elements Total Life Cycle Systems Management Verify & Validate Production Configuration Define Supportability Objectives MTA FMECA FTA RCM LORA Prelim Sys Spec T&E Strategy SEP Support & Maintenance Concepts & Technologies Inputs to: -draft CDD -AoA -TDS -Cost/Manpower Est. ASR Sys Performance Spec LFT&E Waiver Request TEMP Validated Sys Support & Maintenance Objectives & Requirements SEP PESHE PPP TRA Inputs to: -IBR -ISP -STA -CDD -Acq Strategy -Affordability Assessment -Cost/Manpower Est. SVR PRR SRR Initial Prod Baseline Test Reports TEMP Elements of Product Support Risk Assessment SEP TRA PESHE Inputs to: -CPD -STA -ISP -Cost/Manpower Est. Data for In-Service Review Input to CDD for next increment Modifications/upgrades to fielded systems SEP Independent IOT&E Production Baseline Test Reports TEMP PESHE SEP Input to: - Cost/Manpower Est. Full-Up System Level LFT&E J-6 Interoperability & Supportability Validation Product Support Package/PBL Implementation Product Support Elements Support and Cost Baseline Supply Chain Management Contract for Sustainment (organic & commercial) OTRR JITC Interoperability Certification Testing PCA Develop Initial Product Support Strategy Interoperability Supply Chain Mgmt LCC Optimization Footprint reduction Product Support Elements Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Strategy (Preferred Product Support Approach) Refine Supportability Objectives/ Constraints Set Product Support Strategy Pre-IOC & Post IOC Supportability Assessments Continuous Tech Refreshment Obsolescence Management Configuration Control Data Management Product Support/PBL Management Public-Private Partnering PBA Modifications Assessment of PSI/PSPs Supply Chain Management Product Support Plan Statutory/Regulatory Source of Support Legacy Considerations -Supply Support -Training -Maintenance -Support Data -Manpower & personnel Product Support Elements The Challenge DoD’s Big “A”cquisition Systems and Processes

4 The Acquisition Warrior Present Mission Is To Support 126,000 Members of the DoD Acquisition Workforce Acquisition Reform Initiatives from the New Administration and Congress has the DoD Acquisition Workforce Growing to a “Total Force” of 180,000 Government and Contractor Personnel

5 The Acquisition Warrior DAU’s Transformation 2.0 Increased focus on 24/7 learning and performance support for better program outcomes and success Expanding Infrastructure and Human Resources to Support a Greatly Expanded “Total” Acquisition Workforce Moving from Course Management to Learning Asset Management

6 © LearningGuide Solutions US, 2007 When Learning for the First Time When Wanting to Learn More When Trying to Remember and/or Apply When Things Change When Something Goes Wrong 6 Dr. Conrad Gottfredson, BYU The Five Moments of Need Application & Maintenance of Knowledge Performance Support Acquisition of Knowledge Formal Instruction

7 © LearningGuide Solutions US, 2007 Training TEACH (First 2 Moments of Need) TEACH Training Objectives Practice/Demos Deeper Reference Steps Components: E- Learning 1.0 Moment of Need

8 © LearningGuide Solutions US, 2007 Training TEACH (First 2 Moments of Need) TEACH Training Practice/Demos Deeper Reference Steps Training Objectives Practice/Demos Deeper Reference Steps Components: Performance Support DO (Last 3 Moments of Need) DO E- Learning 1.0 Moment of Need E- Performance 2.0

9 ACC BPCh (Informal) Acquisition Knowledge Management System (AKMS) AT&L knowledge repository – gateway to policy and DoD AT&L services (MOSS2007) Repository of validated practices and lessons learned. (MOSS2007) Collaborative arm of the AKMS. Hosts acquisition related Communities of Practice. (Ecco 2.0) Multimedia Video and audio library. (Qumu) Atlas Blackboard Repository, player of online courseware and continuous learning modules. Repository of classroom courseware. Classroom support and course facilitation tool. (Formal) Learning Management Systems Guidance AAP Q&A Policies Webcasts Communities of Practice Videos Best Practices Lessons learned Templates Tools Guidebooks ExamplesExamplesExamplesExamples Regulations LawsLawsLawsLaws Handbooks Audios DL Courses CL Modules DL Course Lessons Classroom Materials Users find formal and informal assets and cohorts/experts through Formal Learning Management and AKMS systems, Search, ACQuipedia articles and icatalog – at their point and time of need.SearchACQuipediaicatalog DAP

10 ….. Continuous Learning Continuous Learning CLMs Conferences Symposia CLBO14CLBO20CLBO11 Module #1Module #2Module #3 DAWIA Training Courses DAWIA Training Courses ACQBUSCONE&TLOG ACQ101 ACQ 201AACQ201BACQ265 IPPDEthicsAoAACQ Strat.Test Plans Performance Support Performance Support ConsultRDTTTLCOE ACTD Exec. ACTD Trans Mgt. Activity Base Cost Lsn #1Lsn #2Lsn #3 Knowledge Sharing Knowledge Sharing AKSSACCACQUIRE CoPSIAWorkspaces AcquisitionContractingS&T DAU LEARNING ASSETS DAU LEARNING ASSETS ….. Lvl 1.0 Lvl2.0 Lvl3.0 Lvl4.0 Lvl5.0 Lvl2.0 Lvl3.0 Lvl2.0 Lvl4.0 Lvl5.0 Products Good News We have world class formal and informal learning assets Bad News Explosive expansion of learning assets More Bad News Inadequate faculty and staff hours to properly manage More Good News LAMP IPT focused on process and resource solutions

11 New KS assets emerging & existing assets continue to grow SME support required – develop, maintain, revise Level of effort – varies by learning asset, ongoing ExpectGrowth ExpectGrowth ExpectGrowth New ExpectGrowth MajorRevisionMajorRevision ExpectGrowth Characteristicsdynamiccollaborativetimely KS Learning Assets ExpectGrowthExpectGrowth

12 KS Learning Assets- ACC ACC Collaborative web-based communities of practice available 24/7 75K+ registered members Avg 4M page views/month Focused on acquisition topics and community participation in sharing of assets and experiences.

13 KS Learning Assets - ACQuipedia ACQuipedia Collaborative web-based encyclopedia of acquisition topics and terms available 24/7 Information is presented in articles, which contain a definition, a narrative that provides further detail and links to relevant policies, directives, guides, tools, training, and other pertinent resources. Will be highly leveraged to support IFC, Communities, and training.

14 KS Learning Assets – Performance Learning Tools (PLT) Performance Learning Tools integrate formal learning assets and other resources into comprehensive job performance support tools that support completing a specific task or process.

15 KS Learning Assets – AKSS / DAP DAP The DAP focuses on the knowledge content supporting the Big & Little Acquisition Processes, including the functions and forces affecting those processes, in the acquisition of weapon systems & services. The Career Gateways web part focuses on career specific information and services provided by DAU, along with additional information available through additional career specific DoD activities.

16 KS Learning Assets - DAG DAG The web-enabled Guidebook is an interactive, on-line reference to policy and discretionary best practice available 24/7 Users are able to navigate via an index, graphical, or topical view, as well as navigate interactively through key terms and requirements in DoD Directive 5000.1and DoD Instruction 5000.2 and to discretionary guidance in the Guidebook Averages 4M page views/month DAG scheduled to transition to ACC in FY09

17 KS Learning Assets - AAP AAP Ask A Professor (AAP) is a Department of Defense resource for asking acquisition and logistics questions concerning policies and practices. AAP is a web-based resource, searchable, and available 24/7

18 KS Learning Assets - BPCh BPCh Facilitates the selection and implementation of acquisition practices appropriate to the needs of individual acquisition programs. BPCh uses an evidence-based approach, linking to existing resources that describe how to implement various best practices. All evidence stored is also contextualized, so that users will be guided to the lessons relevant to their program, type of problem, or specific situation.

19 KS Learning Assets – Multimedia Library Multimedia LibraryMultimedia Library Web-based available 24/7.

20 DAU KM Initiatives for 09 Leveraging CoPs and Mass Collaboration in the ACC (75,000 registered members on 10 Aug 09) – Acquisition Encyclopedia (ACQuipedia) Acquisition Encyclopedia (ACQuipedia) Launched 31 March 09. Looking for continued build and ownership of additional articles – Performance and Learning Tools (PLTs) PM eToolkit – PM Toolkit 15 th Edition web enabled Oct 09 PM eToolkit PLT Market Analysis and PLT priorities DoD wide for FY10 5000.1/5000.02/DAG/IFC in ACC (Planned launch Oct 09) – Interim DAG launched 7 July 09 Interim DAG – Linking PLTs and Search to ACQuipedia Articles PM eToolkit, DAG, IFC, DAP Search

21 DAU KM Initiatives for 09 New Defense Acquisition Portal (DAP) – Formally launched 20 July 2009 – With new “Asset Breakout” Search Output (ACQuire) – New Career Gateways (All 14 career fields) – “Acquisition Services & Systems” gadget iGoogle tool Expanding Best Practice Clearinghouse and developing/integrating Multimedia Library Expanding Best Practice Clearinghouse – Adding PM, PoPS, Requirements Mgt, Log, HCI content – Adding Multimedia Library assets as lessons learned and stories – Exploring Digital Asset Management System

22 ACQuipedia

23 DAP Launched 20 July

24 Advanced Search/Discovery Main Results Window Prioritized to ACQuipedia Pages and Formal Course Modules Results Broken Out Into Asset Type Categories. Results Can be Expanded into Main Results Window

25 Selecting ACQuipedia Articles First Click From Search Results to ACQuipedia Page

26 Second Click to specific learning asset

27 Career Gateways

28 Career Gateway Direct Link to Cert Guides Linked to Courses

29 Personalize Web Services Web Service Auto iGoogle Insertion

30 Personalize Web Services DAP Mini Index

31 Interim DAG

32 Interim DAG Launched 7 July

33 DAU KM Evolution – Past and Present 20012002200320042005200620072008 2009 2010 DoD Deskbook And Ask-A-Professor transition to DAU. MAR 03 PMCoP transitions to DAU from Navy OCT 01 First DoD CoP - PM CoP DAU & Navy Defense ACQ Guidebook DAG JUL 03 PMCoP changes to ACC “system” JUL 96 DoD Deskbook CD AKSS converted To “Portal” AKSS expanded to Defense ACQ Portal (DAP) 20 JUN 06 ACC Enterprise Capability All AT&L CoPS JUL 08 ACC Web 2.0 Expansion Integrated Framework Chart - IFC Oct 09 New DAG in ACC New IFC MAR 09 ACQuipedia Performance Learning Tools Process Guide Best Practices Clearninghouse - BPCh transitions to DAU from OSD MAR 08 BPCh System SE & SAM PM eToolkit PLT In ACC Webcasts, Living Library Podcasts JAN 07 DoD Deskbook expanded to AKSS PBL PLT In ACC DoD Pricing Guides PLT In ACC DAG/IFC PLT Integrated Multimedia Libary Knowledge Gateways, Search and Portals Workforce Collaboration and Knowledge Contribution Performance Learning Tools Proven Practices, Lessons Learned BPCh Expansion PM, Log, HCI Multimedia Assets 1 2 7 6 ACQuire Search 8 359 New System Launch 1. AT&L Knowledge Sharing System (AKSS) 2. Acquisition Community Connection (ACC) 3. ACQuire Search 4. Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) 5. Integrated Framework Chart (IFC) 6. Performance Learning Tools (PLT) 7. Best Practices Clearinghouse (BPCh) 8.. Acquisition Encyclopedia (ACQuipedia) 9. Defense Acquisition Portal (DAP) 4 Pricing PLT SEP/TEMP PLTs

34 DAU KM Evolution - Future 2010201120122013 2014 Knowledge Gateways, Search and Portals Workforce Collaboration and Knowledge Contribution Performance Learning Tools Proven Practices, Lessons Learned Multimedia Assets Exportable Services Personal “My DAP” Intelligent Asset Search Profiled Personalization Multimedia Search Large Video Search ACC Web 3.0Focused CoPs for ACQ Reform Initiatives ACC Integration with DAP and BPCh BPCh Functional Expansion BPCh Requirements Mgt/HCIBPCh/ACC Integration PM eToolkit Expansion DoD PoPS Contracting Folder System DAG/IFC Expansion Acquipedia 2.0 OSD/FIPT/FL Driven Tools New CM/DAM System New YouTube “like” Access System Auto iTunes Uploading DAU Regional Mobile Studios AAP Integration in ACC CoPs ACC as PLT Platform Google Gadgets BPCh 2.0 Virtual DAP-3D Web Virtual ACC-3D Web Virtual BPCh-3D Web Games/Sims as PLTsVirtual PLTs – 3D Web BPCh Contracting BPCh BCEFM

35 Where We Are Going DAU Multi-Media Library DAU on iTunes U Living Library Interview Live WebCast Conference Speakers Guest Lecturers Defense Acquisition Portal (DAP) Best Practices Clearing House (BPCh) ACQuipedia ACQuire Acquisition Community Connection (ACC) Integrated Learning Asset Environment - Asset in One Location -Consumable by all locations DAG/IFC PM eToolkit

36 Summary and Conclusions Developing New Systems and Tools Is Great, But Content Is Still King But The Bad News Is – It’s Exploding This Is Our Biggest KM Issue But There’s Hopefully More Good News - Breadth, depth, currency, and accuracy of “content” can be maintained through mass collaboration of “trusted” users It’s Our Only Hope! The Good News Is – Content Is Exploding

37 eLTC KM Support Team Deborah Aceto-Milton E&T KPO Ivan Teper ACQ/PM KPO Brian Bohr LOG & BCF KPO Ondine Doore BPCh KPO Jennifer Zearley Acquipedia/ CON KPO John Hickok Director, Knowledge Management Jill Garcia ACC/ ACQuipedia LOG & BCF KPO AKSS/DAP/ DAG/IFC PM KPO Mike Lambert AAP/BPCh/ Multimedia KPO KC Carruthers Multimedia Coordinator MSG Roy Stiles Multimedia Content Manager Mike Dorohovich Contractor KM Lead Leesa Lafferre- Thomas ACC Chief Editor Larry Floyd Contracting KPO Vacant

38 We Need You! More Questions?


Download ppt "DAU Midwest Fall Offsite 10 Sept 2009 DAU Transformation 2.0 LAMP DoD/DAU Knowledge Management/Sharing Your KM Team ’05 ’06 ’07."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google