Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLoraine Norman Modified over 9 years ago
1
Dispute Resolution
2
“Facts are ventriloquists’ dummies. Sitting on a wise man’s knee they may be made to utter words of wisdom; elsewhere, they say nothing, or talk nonsense or indulge in sheer diabolism.” Aldus Huxley, British Author
3
Structure of our court systems Civil lawsuits Alternative dispute resolution
4
Litigator: Lawyer who handles court cases Litigation: Process of filing claims in court, and ultimately going to trial Alternative dispute resolution: Formal or informal process used to settle disputes without resorting to a trial
5
United States has over 50 systems of courts Nationwide system of federal courts serves the entire country Each individual state has its court system
7
Determine the facts of a particular dispute ◦ Apply to those facts the law given by earlier appellate court decisions Jurisdiction: Court’s power to hear a case
8
Court has the authority to hear a particular type of case Trial courts of limited jurisdiction ◦ Hear only certain types of cases ◦ Small claims court - Jurisdiction over civil lawsuits ◦ Juvenile court - Hears only cases involving minors ◦ Probate court - Settling the estates of deceased persons
9
Trial courts of general jurisdiction ◦ Hear a very broad range of cases ◦ Most important court - General civil division Personal jurisdiction: Legal authority to require the defendant to: ◦ Stand trial ◦ Pay judgments
10
Personal jurisdiction exists if: ◦ Defendant is a resident of the state in which a lawsuit is filed ◦ Defendant takes a formal step to defend a lawsuit ◦ Summons is served on a defendant Summons: Court’s written notice that a lawsuit has been filed against the defendant ◦ A long-arm statute applies Long-arm statute: Gives a court jurisdiction over someone who commits a tort, signs a contract, or conducts “regular business activities” in the state
11
Accept the facts given to them by trial courts ◦ Review the trial record to see if the court made errors of law Will accept a factual finding unless there was no evidence at all to support it Error of law: Appeals court may require a new trial
12
Court of appeals ◦ Appellant: Party filing the appeal ◦ Appellee: Party opposing the appeal ◦ Briefs: Written arguments on the case ◦ Reversed: Nullified ◦ Affirmed: Permitted to stand
13
State Supreme Court ◦ Highest court in the state ◦ Accepts some appeals from the court of appeals ◦ Seven judges – Justices sit on the Supreme Court
15
Federal question case: Claim based on the United States Constitution, a federal statute, or a federal treaty ◦ Federal courts have jurisdiction Diversity case Diversity jurisdiction: When: ◦ Plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states ◦ The amount in dispute exceeds $75,000
16
United States district court ◦ Primary trial court in the federal system ◦ Nation is divided into about 94 districts Each has a district court Other trial courts ◦ Bankruptcy court ◦ Tax court ◦ United States court of International trade
17
Judges ◦ President of the United States nominates all federal court judges
18
United States courts of appeals ◦ Intermediate courts of appeals ◦ Divided into “circuits” United States Supreme Court ◦ Highest court in the country ◦ Nine justices on the court One justice - Chief justice Eight - Associate justices ◦ Power to hear appeals in any federal case ◦ Writ of certiorari: Petition asking the court to hear the case
19
Pleadings: Documents that begin a lawsuit ◦ Complaint ◦ Answer ◦ Sometimes a reply
20
Complaint: Short, plain statement of the facts alleged and the legal claims made Service ◦ Summons - Paper ordering the defendant to answer the complaint within 20 days Answer - Brief reply to each of the allegations in the complaint ◦ Default judgment: Decision that the plaintiff wins without trial because the defendant failed to answer in time
21
Counter-claim: Second lawsuit by the defendant against the plaintiff ◦ Reply - Answer to a counter-claim Class actions: One plaintiff represents the entire group of plaintiffs ◦ Those who are unaware of the lawsuit or even unaware they are harmed
22
Judgment on the pleadings ◦ Motion: Formal request to the court that the court take some step or issue some order ◦ Motion to dismiss: Request that the court terminate a case without permitting it to go further Discovery: Critical, pre-trial opportunity for both parties to: ◦ Learn the strengths and weaknesses of the opponent’s case
23
Discovery ◦ Interrogatories - Written questions that the opposing party must answer, in writing, under oath ◦ Depositions - Provide a chance for one party’s lawyer to question the other party Deponent: Person being questioned ◦ Production of documents and things
24
Discovery ◦ Physical and mental examination Motion for a protective order: Request that the court limit discovery Motion to compel answers to interrogatories Memorandum: Supporting argument In camera inspection: Judge views the requested documents alone, with no lawyers present Decides whether the other side is entitled to view them
25
E-Discovery ◦ Businesses large and small have vast amounts of data stored electronically Other discovery
26
Ruling by the court that no trial is necessary because: ◦ Some essential facts are not in dispute
27
Attorneys make lists of all witnesses they will call Prepare each witness very carefully Rehearse the questions Takes hours and hours, for many days
28
Adversary system ◦ Putting a witness on the stand and letting both lawyers question Truth will emerge Right to jury trial ◦ Plaintiff and defendant have a right to demand a jury trial when: Lawsuit is one for money damages
29
Voir dire: Process of selecting a jury ◦ Challenges for cause: Claiming that a juror has demonstrated probable bias ◦ Peremptory challenges: Right to excuse a juror for virtually any reason Opening statements - Summarizing the proof he or she expects to offer, with the plaintiff going first
30
Burden of proof ◦ Preponderance of the evidence: Plaintiff’s burden in a civil lawsuit ◦ Beyond a reasonable doubt: Government’s burden in a criminal prosecution
32
Plaintiff’s case ◦ Direct examination: When a lawyer asks questions of her own witness ◦ Cross-examine: Ask questions of an opposing witness Rules of evidence ◦ Law of evidence: What questions a lawyer may ask How the questions are to be phrased What answers a witness may give What documents may be introduced
33
Motion for directed verdict ◦ Directed verdict: Ruling that the plaintiff has entirely failed to prove some aspect of her case ◦ Permissible only if the evidence favors the defendant that: Reasonable minds could not disagree on it Defendant’s case
34
Closing arguments ◦ Lawyers sum up their case to the jury: Explaining how they hope the jury will interpret what they have heard Jury instructions ◦ The judge instructs the jury to evaluate the case solely on the facts of the evidence presented
35
Verdict ◦ Jury deliberates informally, with all jurors entitled to voice their opinion Motions after the verdict ◦ Judgment non obstante veredicto (JNOV): Judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict
36
Precedent: Earlier decisions by the state appellate courts on similar issues Appeals court options ◦ Affirm: Allow the decision to stand ◦ Modify: Affirm the outcome but with changes ◦ Reverse and remand: Nullify the lower decision and return the case for reconsideration ◦ Reverse: Turning the loser into the winner, with no new trial ◦ Harmless error: Mistake by the trial judge that was too minor to affect the outcome
37
Negotiation ◦ Majority of disputes are resolved this way Mediation ◦ Mediator - Attempts to guide the two disputing parties toward a voluntary settlement ◦ Advantages - Two antagonists can speak freely All discussions are confidential Offers the strongest “win–win” potential
38
Arbitration ◦ Bring in a neutral third party Arbitrator has the power to impose an award Arbitrator after deliberation, issues a binding decision
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.