Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 SITUATEDNESS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 SITUATEDNESS."— Presentation transcript:

1 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 SITUATEDNESS

2 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Basic Ideas Interaction not just encoding Construction not just recall Cognitive Science Dewey (1896): “Sequences of acts are composed such that subsequent experiences categorize and hence give meaning to what was experienced before.” Gero (1998): “where you are when you do what you do matters” Experimental Studies Schön and Wiggins (1992): “interaction of making and seeing” Suwa, Gero and Purcell (1999): “Sketches serve as a physical setting in which design thoughts are constructed on the fly in a situated way.” Situatedness

3 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 “Where you are when, matters”

4 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002

5

6 “What you focus on, matters”

7 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002

8

9 “What you are looking for affects what you see”

10 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 No unique representation of world, depends partly on your expectations

11 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 SITUATION EXPERIENCEMEMORIES Constructive Memory

12 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Constructive Memory

13 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Hypothesizing pull push Interpretation External World Expected World Interpreted World Action SITUATEDNESS: An interaction of different worlds

14 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Process Theory of Designing based on FBS PROCESS THEORY of DESIGNING 1 = formulation 2 = synthesis 3 = analysis 4 = evaluation 5 = documentation 6 = reformulation -1 7 = reformulation -2 8 = reformulation -3 F = function  = transformation Be = expected behavior  = comparison Bs = behavior derived from structure S = structure D = design description

15 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 push-pull focussingcomparisontransformation Situated FBS Theory of Designing New processes

16 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Formulation

17 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Synthesis

18 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Analysis

19 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Evaluation

20 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Documentation

21 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Reformulation Type 1

22 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Reformulation Type 2

23 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Reformulation Type 3

24 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Initial Representation

25 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002

26 Example Sepulchral Church, Sir John Soane, 1796

27 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Learning the situatedness

28 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Multiple situations

29 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Implementation S 2 S 3 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 2 (a)(b ) S 2 S 3 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 2 S 3 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 1 S 3 S 3 S 3 (c)(d)

30 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Providing different moves (alternatives) in response to design actions

31 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Schön and Wiggins (1992): “interaction of making and seeing” l Representation (R) l Process (P) l Computation (C) l C = P x {R} l C = R x {P}

32 John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 Situated Sketching (after Stiny & after Schön)  An area of interest is focused on.  Memory constructed from previous, recalled experiences.  Situations are constructed/recalled.  “Interesting” new shapes are learned.      Situated “Reflection-in-Action”


Download ppt "John S Gero MIT Class 4.209 Winter 2002 SITUATEDNESS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google