1. Impact of Migration on Older Age Parents Presented by HOUN Kalyan and KHUON Chandore at CDRF National Symposium September 9-10, 2010, Phnom Penh CCC/ADI and the University of Utah/IPIA thank the Doha International Institute of Family and Developing Studies for their support in this collaborative research Preliminary findings from two communes of Battambang province

2. “The outlook for the Tonle Sap region and Cambodia is further acceleration in migration…. The medium-term outlook … is one of continued demographic destabilization of the countryside as able-bodied young men and women desert village after village, while the old and the very young, along with the destitute, are left behind to tend the farms.” Source: ‘Domestic and Cross-Border Migration from the Tonle Sap’ In We are Living with Worry All the Time: A Participatory Poverty Assessment of the Tonle Sap, Phnom Penh: Cambodia Development Resource Institute (CDRI), April 2007. CDRI RESEARCHERS HAVE OBSERVED

3. BUT:  Are able bodied men and women deserting village after village in Cambodia to work as labor migrants?  Are the old and young left behind to work on the farms with no one to help?  Are the destitute more likely to be left behind? MIGRATION IS ACCELERATING IN CAMBODIA

4.  Show some preliminary findings from this study  Determine whether older people are being left behind  Compare the situation of elderly people with and without migrant children AIM OF THE PRESENTATION

5.  Two communes (Treng and Talos) in two districts (Ratanak Mondul and Mong Reussey) of Battambang province  Survey questionnaires with 265 people aged 60 to 70 who have at least one living child RESEARCH METHODS

6. The percent of elderly households having a migrant child is high. But the percent having a child at home or in the village is even higher. Average number of living children 4.8 MIGRATION BUT NOT DESERTION CHARACTERIZES THE OLDER-AGE HOUSEHOLDS

7. NOT ALL ABLE-BODIED CHILDREN HAVE LEFT THE VILLAGE

8. HAVING MIGRANT CHILDREN DOES NOT LEAVE THE OLD AND THE YOUNG ALONE AT HOME

9. Migration Status Has current migrant child Has no current migrant child Total Number of cases17095265 Wealth score 1 (mean)4.84.64.8 Percentage of those who do not have land 36%22%31% Physical ability score 2 (mean)4.54.64.5 Family satisfaction score 3 (mean) 7.37.57.4 Psychological well-being score 4 (mean) 11.111.411.2 1 Measured as a summed score of thirteen household items plus two housing characteristics. 2 Physical ability score is based on respondent’s perception on three measures. Highest physical ability score is 6 and lowest is 0. 3 Family satisfaction score is based on respondent’s perception of how family gets along and depends on each other and how children are doing with their lives. Highest family satisfaction score is 3 and lowest is 9. 4 Psychological well-being score is based on respondent’s perception on six measures. Highest psychological well-being score is 18 and lowest is 6. EXCEPT FOR HAVING LAND, THE SITUATION OF ELDERLY PARENTS WITH OR WITHOUT MIGRANT CHILDREN IS COMPARABLE

10. N/A CHILDREN’S CONTRIBUTION TO PARENTS BY CHILD’S CURRENT LOCATION OF RESIDENCE

11. DIRECTION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BETWEEN MIGRANT CHILDREN AND PARENTS (n=344)

12. CHILDREN LIVING OUTSIDE THE VILLAGE MAINTAIN SOCIAL CONTACT WITH THEIR PARENTS AT LEAST ONCE A MONTH N/A

13. Location of nearest child In householdIn villageOutside village Number of cases2123023 Wealth score 1 (mean)5.143.303.26 Percentage of those who do not have land25%40%74% Physical ability score 2 (mean)4.524.734.61 Family satisfaction score 3 (mean)7.556.617.05 Psychological well-being score 4 (mean)11.4110.1010.77 1 Measured as a summed score of thirteen household items plus two housing characteristics. 2 Physical ability score is based on respondent’s perception on three measures. Highest physical ability score is 6 and lowest is 0. 3 Family satisfaction score is based on respondent’s perception of how family gets along and depends on each other and how children are doing with their lives. Highest family satisfaction score is 9 and lowest is 3. 4 Psychological well-being score is based on respondent’s perception on six measures. Highest psychological well-being score is 18 and lowest is 6. RESPONDENTS WITH ALL CHILDREN OUTSIDE THE VILLAGE ARE SMALL IN NUMBER BUT MANY ARE LANDLESS AND POOR

14.  The preliminary findings show that there is high rate of migration in the two communes but at the same time a high rate of children living in the same household and village of their older-age parents.  This may be due to the high average number of living children among the older-age parents.  Overall, the old and the young have not been left behind. Children remain in the household to help their parents with business and farm work while migrant children contribute more money to their parents. CONCLUSIONS

15.  Children living outside the village maintain social contact with their parents at least once a month.  Except for having land, the situation of elderly parents with or without migrant children is comparable.  Respondents with all children outside the village are small in number but many are landless and poor. CONCLUSIONS

16. 16 esp THANK YOU CCC/ADI DONORS