1. The Analysis of the quality of learning achievement of the students enrolled in Introduction to Programming with Visual Basic 2010 Present By Thitima Chuangchai

2. Topics  Background and the Importance of the study Background and the Importance of the study  Literature Review Literature Review  Methodology Methodology  Results of the study Results of the study  Conclusion Conclusion  Purposes of the study Purposes of the study

3. Introduction  The quality evaluation tools are important in order to evaluate correctly or reliably. According to the evaluation, it was important to evaluate the students if they achieved the goal. So the examinations have implemented by the experts when they were passed the criterion. Thereafter, They will be used with the students.

4. Purposes of the study  The purpose is finding the content validity of measurement for Programming with Visual Basic 2010 Subject.

5. Literature Review  The classical test theories The classical test theories  Related Research Related Research

6. Analysis of content for learning objectives designed to test construction. 1. Finding out the topics  This was implemeted through examining the relationship of the topics in relation to the Coral-Pattern Method 2. Evaluate Sub–topic  This step can be implemented by using the Sub – topic evaluation Sheet in that the sub–topics identifies overall contents analyzed through the Coral-Pattern Method 3. Arrange the order of the contents  The analyzed topics were further used for writing the content structure by the Network Diagram. 4. Write the behavioral objectives  The topics were written in relevance with the design and analysis of the categories of knowlege, for example, Recall of Knowledge, Applied knowledge, Transfer, Cognitive Domain, Psychomotor Domain, or Affective Domain. Thereafter, the specified category was filled out in the Objective Analysis Listing Form.

7. Content Validation Techniques  Step 1-Prepare and select objective or domain specifications  Step 2-Clarify test’s purposes, desirable formats, number of items, instruction for writing  Step 3-Write items to measure the objectives  Step 4- Item writers perform the initial edit  Step 5-Systematically assess item match to objectives to determine representativeness  Step 6-Perform additional item editing  Step 7-Assemble the test  Step 8-Select and implement method for setting standards for interpreting performance  Step 9 - Administer the test  Step10 - Collect data addressing reliability, validity, and norms  Step11 - Prepare user’s manual / technical manual  Step12 - Conduct ongoing studies relating test to different situations and populations

8. Content Validation Techniques(Con.) IOC is higher than 0.5, the test is acceptable IOC is lower than 0.5, the test is unacceptable The permitted ratings are 1 (the item clearly taps the construct), 0 (the expert is unsure whether or not the item taps the construct, and –1 (the item clearly does not tap the construct).

9. Related Research  Syh-Jong Jang, Shih-Ying Guan, Hsing-Fen Hsieh(2009) conducted the research on developing an instrument for assessing college students’ perceptions of teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument that could be employed to evaluate college students’ perceptions of teachers’ PCK. According to the pilot test results, the four categories finally constructed were Subject Matter Knowledge (SMK), Instructional Representation and Strategies (IRS), Instructional Objects and Context (IOC), and Knowledge of Students’ Understanding (KSU). Results of analysis indicated that the instrument about teachers’ knowledge showed satisfactory validity and reliability. The suggestions for application of the instrument in future research are also identified.

10. Related Research Jintana Toedwongworakul (2012) conducted the research on Development of Web-based Instruction on Alternative Energy for Mathayomsuksa 2 Students. The objectives of this research were : 1) to develop Web-based Instruction on Alternative Energy for Mathayomsuksa 2 at the efficiency 80/80 of criteria; 2) to compare the learning achievement score with the pretest score. 3) to study the students’ satisfactions toward Web-based Inwtruction on Alternative Energy.

11. Related Research Pornlak Pantahachart Saengswarng (2013) conducted the research on The Effects of Supplemental Online and Traditional Tutorials for a Fundamental English Course on Students’ English Proficiency and Learning Achievement. The purposes of this experimental research were: 1) to study the effects of supplemental online and traditional tutorials on students’ English proficiency; 2) to study the effects of supplemental online and traditional tutorials on students’ learning achievement after a fundamental English course; and 3) examine the students’ attitudes toward those tutorials.

12. Methodology  First…Analyse curriculum and the main content of each unit.  Design objectives in relevance with the content of course description.  Analyze the topic evaluation and Objective Listing  Set the questions and options for providing a benchmarking tool for learning. The first objective should be the test for at least 3-5 deals to cover the required content measured.

13. Methodology (Con.)  Validate the IOC by five specialists. Finally… Gather results from the five specialists for accuracy. The exam pass was greater than 0.5 or more. If they could not pass, they were adjusted and sent to the experts for evaluated again.

14. The construction of the test Analyse curriculum/content Draw Coral Pattern,Network Diagram Validate the IOC Revision Yes Write questions to cover the objectives No Pilot the test

15. Results of the study Chapter Objectives AcceptReject 15 0 25 1 39 0 45 0 54 0 64 0 Total32 1 Table 1 : The Summaries of objectives followed by contents.

16. Results of the study  In accordance to the 152 multiple-choice question items to examine the response of the objectives, five experts were asked to investigate the validity.  The results identifying te items that passed the experts’ evaluation were showed in the Table 2.

17. Results of the study Table 2: Results in indices of items in congruence with the experts’ rates (Learning Achievement) IOC Experts Rate Total of ItemsCriteria 10 1 50070 0.841053 Accept (144Items) 0.6 32021 0.4 311 6 0.2 3021 Reject 0 1311 (8 Items)

18. Conclusion  In congruence with the evaluation of the IOC value of 152 question items, the total of 144 items were accepted.  In other words, the accepted items showed the IOC valued of over 0.5. Regarding the objectives of the questions, an individual item should gain at least the score of 96 (32 objectives x 3 items). As such, the question was considered appropriate to be used in the instrument to evaluate the students’ performance.

19. Recommendations  Overall 8 questions that were rejected can be further used in that an individual item which gained the IOC value of 0.4 can be revised and improved for the re-evaluation by the experts until it reach the criteria. As regards, a total of 150 questions can be collected in the test bank.

20. Further Research  The reliable questions which were used for testing the students enrolled in Introduction to Programming with Visual Basic 2010 can be further employed and then analyzed to find out the discrimiation, difficulty, and reliability. These can also be used for investigating of the students’ performance in the E-learning environment.

21. Thank You

22. Q&A