Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002."— Presentation transcript:

1 Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002

2 What I Will Cover Menu of Harmonized Options Model for Assessing Benefits of Harmonized Strategies New International Web Site

3 STAPPA/ALAPCO Menu of Options for Multi-Pollutant Strategies  Utilities  Transportation  Industrial  Res/Com  Waste  Agriculture  Analyzed Every Economic Sector  Reviewed Market Mechanisms  Modeled Case Studies in Four Areas

4 Information Included for Each Industrial Sector Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Emissions Technology-Based Strategies Policy-Based Strategies Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Experiences and Obstacles Market Penetration

5 Power Generation Technology Options Combined Heat and Power Gas-Fired Combined Cycle Co-Firing with Biomass and Gas Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Fluidized-Bed Combustion Fuel Cells Carbon Sensitive Plant Dispatch

6 Power Generation Strategies: Costs and Emissions Reductions TechnologyCapital Cost ($/kW) Total Costs ($kWh) EfficiencyPercent CO2 Reduction Cost of CO 2 Reductions ($/ton) Percent SO 2 Reduction Percent NO x Reduction Baseline: Older Conventional Coal $00.015-0.0330%0000 Combined Heat and Power VariableN/AVariable ($41)-$50Variable Gas-Fired Combined Cycle $500-$6100.03-0.04550%66%$0-$39>99%99% Co-Firing with Natural Gas (10%) $3-$100.021-0.02933%5%($19)-$309-10%30-75% Integrated Gasification/ Combined Cycle $1,500-$2,0000.041-0.0742%29%$33-$191>99%90% Atmospheric Fluidized-Bed Combustion $1,500-$2,0000.04-0.07835%14%$59-$37195%70-90% Pressurized Fluidized-Bed Combustion $1,200-$1,5000.036-0.06443%30%$17-$138>99%70-90% PA Fuel Cell$3,000-$3,5000.071-0.11560%72%$49-$119>99%

7 Power Generation Policy Options Comparable Emission Standards Output-Based Emission Standards Tax Credits and Subsidies Environmental Disclosure Emissions Portfolio Standards Renewable Portfolio Standards Emissions Trading

8 Renewable Power Technology Options Hydropower Biomass Combustion Geothermal Systems Wind Turbines Photovoltaics Solar Thermal

9 Renewable Power Strategies: Costs and Emissions Reductions TechnologyCapital Cost ($/kW) Total Costs ($/kWh) Cost of CO 2 Reductions ($/ton) Percent CO 2 Reduction Percent SO 2 Reduction Percent NO x Reduction Wind950-1,1000.039 – 0.078-47100 PV (High Volume)4,5000.21153-166100 Solar Thermal (Parabolic Trough) 2,7000.10-0.1360-98100 Biomass1,900-2,1000.05-0.09518-6410098-10083-99 Landfill Gas (Fuel Cell) 5,0000.07-0.100.01-0.024,090>99 Geothermal (Flash Stream) 1,4000.05-0.0818-589697100 Hydro at a New Site1,700-2,3000.055-0.0721-47100 Hydro at an Existing Dam 900-1,1000.033-0.0373-19100 b 100

10 Renewable Power Policy Options Tax Credits Systems Benefit Charges Air Permitting Exemptions Green Pricing Programs Renewable Portfolio Standards Environmental Disclosure Output-Based Emission Standards

11 Evaluation of Harmonized Control Strategies Developed “What-If” Scenarios For Four Areas Atlanta, GA Louisville, KY New Hampshire Ventura, CA Areas Selected Power Generation, Transportation,Industrial and Commercial Measures to Reduce CO 2 and Other Air Pollutants

12 Harmonized Strategy Summary for the Four Case Study Areas Level of Penetration Modeling for Each Area Harmonized Strategies by SectorNew Hampshire Atlanta, GALouisville, KY Ventura County, CA Electric Generation Gas-fired generation converted to gas combined- cycle 0% 100% Fuel switch from oil or coal to natural gas25%20%0% Coal-fired capacity displaced by natural gas combined-cycle capacity 50%30%25%0% Fossil-fuel generation displaced by renewables1% Fossil-fuel generation displaced by fuel cells1%

13 Percent Reduction from Baseline Emissions in Each Case Study Area AreaSO 2 NO x PMVOCCOCO 2 New Hampshire41%17%12%3%4%12% Atlanta, GA40%6%1%3%4%7% Louisville, KY26%14%3% 4%15% Ventura County, CA 2%4%1%4% 11%

14 STAPPA/ALAPCO Model For Assessing Benefits Strategic Planning Tool with ICLEI User Friendly Model Assessing and Quantifying Benefits of Strategies Will Expand to Developing Countries Beta Testing Expected Shortly

15 STAPPA/ALAPCO International Web Site Links Every National, State and Local Air Agency in the World, Including Web Addresses, Email and More Provides Topical Links on Major Clean Air Issues, Including Climate Change Address: cleanairworld.org


Download ppt "Taking the Lead: State Innovations to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Bill Becker STAPPA/ALAPCO February 28, 2002."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google