Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

8-Digit HUC Watershed Prioritization in Arkansas - Risk Assessment Matrix Approach 2014 Update Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Dharmendra Saraswat,

Published byClaude Ryan Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "8-Digit HUC Watershed Prioritization in Arkansas - Risk Assessment Matrix Approach 2014 Update Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Dharmendra Saraswat,"— Presentation transcript:

1 8-Digit HUC Watershed Prioritization in Arkansas - Risk Assessment Matrix Approach 2014 Update Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Dharmendra Saraswat, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Extension Engineer Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dsaraswat, 501-681-5987 (cell) ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

2 What is Arkansas Watershed Prioritization Approach? Pro-active stakeholder participation A comparative risk assessment based collaborative process that integrate scientific analysis and stakeholder deliberation ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 For further details please refer: Fact sheet #FSPPC 116- Watershed prioritization for managing nonpoint source pollution in Arkansas. Available at http://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/FSPPC116.pdf ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

3 What Data Sources are considered? ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Federal State ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 NASS Data, Census Data, 303(d) list, Land Use Land Cover, and Road network

4 Continuous Stakeholder Engagement Sl#Approved category 1Water Body impairment 2Human Health Impact 3Biotic Impacts 4Potential Human Exposure 5Construction 6Rural Roads 7Non-row Crop Agriculture 8Row Crop Agriculture 9Urban 10Forestry 11Priority of a Bordering State 2005-2009 Plan 2008 Revision ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

5 12. Neighbor’s Priority 11. Forestry 8. Cropland 10. Unpaved Roads 9. Livestock & Pasture 6. Impervious Surface 5. Urban/Suburban Population 7. Economic Activity 2. Use Impact 34810 2686 3 51 379 1. Water Impairment 34810 2686 3 51 379 2. Use Impact 0100 000 0000 000 12. Neighboring State Priority 1. Water Impairment 4. Human Exposure 3. Biotic Impact Assign Score for Each Category Final Score = X ( ) Overlay Scoring Approach ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

6 Proposed Revision- Time line 1.During 2013 ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder meeting, a proposal to include Threatened and Endangered (T&E) species in the matrix was considered 2.A workgroup was formed to discuss adding T & E species as matrix variable 3.The group met on November 6, 2013 and May 28, 2014 and came up with an approach for consideration by the stakeholders group ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

7 T&E Species in AR Watersheds ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Present in 32 (out of 58) 8-digit HUC watersheds Source: Chris Davidson, US Fish and Wildlife Service

8 T&E Species Endemic to Arkansas ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Present in 9 (out of 58) 8-digit HUC watersheds Source: Chris Davidson, US Fish and Wildlife Service

9 T&E Species Endemic to Region ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Present in 10 (out of 58) 8-digit HUC watersheds Source: Chris Davidson, US Fish and Wildlife Service

10 T&E Species Neither Endemic to Arkansas or Region ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Present in 17 (out of 58) 8-digit HUC watersheds Source: Chris Davidson, US Fish and Wildlife Service

11 Demo ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

12 Priority Map (excluding T&E) ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

13 Acknowledgments ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014 Mr. Tom Riley, Retired Director, Public Policy Center, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Service Ben Hancock, Staff Member at Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department

14 Questions/Discussions ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

15 Priority Watersheds Subwatershed NameHUC (8-digit) Drainage Area (km 2 ) Majority Land UseFinal Risk Matrix Percentile Beaver Reservoir110100015625.71Forest (64%)100 Poteau111101051442.52Forest (61%)98 Bayou Bartholomew080402053976.38Forest (59%)97 Illinois111101031962.51Pasture (45%)95 Ouachita Headwaters080401014007.36Forest (77%)93 Lake Conway-Point Remove111102032961.08Forest (54%)91 Upper Ouachita080401024542.74Forest (79%)90 Upper Saline080402034442.43Forest (78%)88 L Anguille080202052473.54Crops (71%)85 Cache080203025067.21Crops (67%)85 Strawberry110100121971.50Forest (58%)83 Lower Ouachita-Smackover080402014662.94Forest (82%)81 ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

16 Risk Matrix Summary WatershedHUC 8 digitC1C2C3C4C5C6C7C8C9C10C11C12Total Beaver Reservoir11010001 10 8.285.697.934.148.792.766.3110838.97 Poteau11110105 100 8.62 9.222.414.315.863.4510725.00 Bayou Bartholomew8040205 10 84.143.622.476.724.054.317.4110707.24 Illinois11110103 850109.319.669.915.348.108.455.5210650.34 Ouachita Headwaters8040101 105 7.248.285.140.863.198.795.570640.69 Lake Conway-Point Remove11110203 810 7.939.149.485.176.553.625.690620.69 Upper Ouachita8040102 10 3.976.034.530.691.727.936.780616.55 Upper Saline8040203 810 8.108.455.311.721.909.315.970566.07 Cache8020302 104 25.863.796.908.972.167.595.170564.31 L Anguille8020205 10 24.835.003.079.141.387.413.600564.31 Strawberry11010012 10 23.285.173.455.003.458.284.910555.34 Lower Ouachita-Smackover8040201 10 82.073.286.290.341.905.697.120546.90 *C1 = Water body impairment, C2 = Designated usage, C3 = Biotic impact, C4 = Potential human impact, C5 = Urban suburban population, C6 = Impervious surface, C7 = Economic activity, C8 = Cropland, C9 = Livestock and pasture, C10 = Unpaved roads, C11 = Forestry, C12 = Adjacent state priority ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

17 Selected Priority Watersheds Name HUC 8 Digit Name of impaired streams/segments Causes for impairment*Source Ouachita Headwaters8040101Marzam CreekpHNO T SPECIFIED Little Marzam CreekpHUN Prairie CreekDO, Cu, TbSE Upper Ouachita8040102Cove CreekpH, SO4, TDSRE, UN Chamberlain CreekpH, SO4, TDS, Cu, Zn, CdRE Lucinda CreekpH, SO4, ZnRE D.C. CreekZnRE Caddo RiverTb, ZnRE Ouachita RiverZnUN Deceiper CreekpHUN Freeo CreekpHUN White Oak CreekpHUN Tulip CreekpHUN Cypress CreekpHUN S. Fork CaddoCu, ZnRE ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

18 Selected Priority Watersheds Name HUC 8 Digit Name of impaired streams/segments Causes for impairment*Source Cache8020302Cache RiverTDS, Pb, TbAG Frierson LakeSl, CuUN Old TownNUUN Bayou DeViewCl, TDS, PbIP, MP, AG Lost Creek DitchClUN Strawberry11010012Strawberry RiverTb, PASE Lower Ouachita- Smackover 8040201Moro CreekCu, Pb, Tb, HgUN, SE Ouachita RiverCu, Zn, HgUN L. Champagnolle Cr.HgUN ChampagnolleHgUN Elcc Tributary Cu, Zn, NO3, Cl, SO4, TDS, AM IP Flat CreekCu, Zn, Cl, SO4, TDSRE, IP Salt CreekpH, Cu, Cl, TDSRE, IP Prairie CreekTbSE Smackover CreekDO, ZnUN Jug CreekCuMP ANRC NPS Annual Stakeholder Meeting, September 17, 2014

Download ppt "8-Digit HUC Watershed Prioritization in Arkansas - Risk Assessment Matrix Approach 2014 Update Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Dharmendra Saraswat,"

Similar presentations

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.

Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Surface Water Availability. Surface Water Considerations.

Surface Water Availability. Surface Water Considerations.
What We Heard at the November 2011 Community Workshops.

What We Heard at the November 2011 Community Workshops.
Update: National Assessment of Fish Habitats Climate Change and Fish Habitat Meeting, Denver, CO, October 19-20, 2009 Dana Infante 1, Peter Esselman 1,2,

Update: National Assessment of Fish Habitats Climate Change and Fish Habitat Meeting, Denver, CO, October 19-20, 2009 Dana Infante 1, Peter Esselman 1,2,
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.

Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
SWAT Model Study for Illinois River Drainage Area (IRDA) in Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: M. Daniels,

SWAT Model Study for Illinois River Drainage Area (IRDA) in Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: M. Daniels,
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.

Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Status of Pennsylvania’s AMD Set-Aside Program By Pam Milavec Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation.

Status of Pennsylvania’s AMD Set-Aside Program By Pam Milavec Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation.
Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.

Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.
Marty Matlock, Ph.D., P.E., C.S.E. Professor and Area Director, Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability Ecological Engineering Group Biological.

Marty Matlock, Ph.D., P.E., C.S.E. Professor and Area Director, Center for Agricultural and Rural Sustainability Ecological Engineering Group Biological.
Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) 471-6988(402) 471 - 4224

Incorporating the 9-Elements into a WMP Lindsey PhillipsMike Archer Source Water CoordinatorState Lakes Coordinator (402) (402)
Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12- digit HUC Priority Watersheds – Phase II P RESENTED BY : N ARESH P AI PI: Dharmendra Saraswat Collaborator: Mike.

Comprehensive Watershed Modeling for 12- digit HUC Priority Watersheds – Phase II P RESENTED BY : N ARESH P AI PI: Dharmendra Saraswat Collaborator: Mike.
Landscape Fragmentation in the Lake Champlain Basin Charlotte Low Matt Gustafson Walker Brown Photograph: Caldwell Clark 2010 (Mt. Philo)

Landscape Fragmentation in the Lake Champlain Basin Charlotte Low Matt Gustafson Walker Brown Photograph: Caldwell Clark 2010 (Mt. Philo)
Dolores River Non-point source pollution watershed planning process Chester Anderson B.U.G.S. Consulting Bioassessment Underwater, Graphs and Stats.

Dolores River Non-point source pollution watershed planning process Chester Anderson B.U.G.S. Consulting Bioassessment Underwater, Graphs and Stats.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.

L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.

Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.

Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.

Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.

Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google