Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North.

Published byLinda Pope Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North."— Presentation transcript:

1 Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North Florida Vicki Waytowich, Early Delinquency Intervention Program, Tim Cheney, Northeast Florida Center for Community Initiative University of North Florida

2 Improving the Odds for Kids Early Delinquency Intervention Program The EDIP Concept Age Arrest History Mental health History of EDIP EDIP 1 (Jacksonville, 1992) EDIP 2 (Tampa-St. Pete area, 1996)

3 Improving the Odds for Kids Components Residential Component Intensive Assessment 2 Weeks (+/-) “Home School” Attendance Therapeutic Intervention Individual/family/group therapy Social problem interventions

4 Improving the Odds for Kids Components Case Management 6- 9 Month Aftercare Multi-systemic Weekly Supervision Treatment Plans Linkages Mental Health Judicial/Community Service Family Interventions Leisure Education

5 Improving the Odds for Kids Components Referral Process Diversion State Attorney referred Diversion plan Non-compliance issues? Court Ordered Department of Juvenile Justice referred Sanction of probation Non-compliance issues?

6 Improving the Odds for Kids EDIP Locations

7 Improving the Odds for Kids EVALUATION History 6 th Year “Participatory Research” Approach Methodology Quantitative and Qualitative Approach Focus Groups Review of Program Records Review of DJJ Files This Report Primarily for 1999-2001

8 1994-2001 EDIP CLIENT DEMOGRAPHICS OVERALL 2000-011999-001998-991997-981996-971995-961994-95 RACE (n)264297388309348218171 Non-White Females8.7%14.1%11.9%9.7%13.7%10.1%7.6% Non-White Males33.3%37.0%32.2%30.4%26.8%36.7%37.4% White Females18.6%12.1%12.4%12.9%15.2%10.6%9.4% White Males39.4%36.7%43.6%46.9%44.3%42.6%45.6% AGE at ADMISSION (n) 268317422327343218171 Average Age14.1014.0213.913.613.913.613.5 11 and Under5.5%6.6%7.3%9.2%4.9%6.5%4.8% 128.4%11.0%11.4%12.8%8.6%16.1%9.1% 1322.6%28.1%23.2%17.4%21.6%19.1%34.5% 1428.8%25.9%27.7%27.5%29.4%32.2%31.5% 1530.3%24.6%28.2%29.4%28.8%25.1%18.8% 16 and Up4.4%3.8%2.1%3.7%6.9%1.0%1.2% Note: Overall, there were 347 clients served in 1999-2000 and 272 clients served by in 2000-2001. The discussion here does not include clients with files missing data on Race, Sex, and Age. Data Source: 1994-2001 EDIP DataTrack Databases

9 TABLE 9 ACADEMIC PROFILE 2000-011999-00 AdmissionDischarge Percent Change AdmissionDischarge Percent Change EDIP I GPA 1.541.55 *1.591.20- 25% Unexcused Absences 6.175.94 - 4%5.55.31- 94% Referrals 4.023.27 - 19%4.51.26- 94% Grades Failed 73.6%n/a 68.1%n/aN/a EDIP II GPA 2.011.89 - 6%1.701.94+ 14% Unexcused Absences 17.016.43 - 62%7.651.38- 82% Referrals 7.391.36 - 82%4.56.63- 86% Grades Failed 41.4%n/a 34.0%n/an/ * Less than 1% n/a Not Applicable Data Source: 2000-01 EDIP DataTrack Database

10 1999-00 EDIP CLIENT ABUSE FACTORS BY LOCATION Jacksonville Discharged Tampa Area Discharged PRIOR TO EDIP186161 Physical Abuse (YES) 14.5%6.2% Sexual Abuse (YES) 6.5%6.8% Emotional Abuse (YES) 15.1%11.2% Neglect (YES) 17.2%3.1% Alcohol Use (YES) 14.0%33.5% Drug Use (YES) 21.5%37.9% Data Source: 1999-00 EDIP DataTrack Database Improving the Odds for Kids

11 2000-01 EDIP CLIENT ABUSE FACTORS BY LOCATION Jacksonville Discharged Tampa Area Discharged PRIOR TO EDIP73109 Physical Abuse (YES) 15.1%16.5% Sexual Abuse (YES) 6.8%12.8% Emotional Abuse (YES) 23.3%11.9% Neglect (YES) 11.0%3.7% Alcohol Use (YES) 24.7%43.1% Drug Use (YES) 37.0%50.5% Data Source: 2000-01 EDIP DataTrack Database Improving the Odds for Kids

12 EDIP RECIDIVISM RATES 2000- 2001 1999- 2000 1998- 1999 1997- 1998 1996- 1997 Overall 31.6% (n=171) 39.9% (n=308) NA39.2%35.8% EDIP 1 27.1% (n=70) 30.6% (n=186) 30.6%27.0%*24.2%* EDIP 2 34.7% (n=101) 54.1% (N=122) NA53.6%47.1%

13 1999-2000 EDIP I & EDIP II CORRELATIONS OF SELECT RISK FACTORS WITH DELINQUENCY INDICATORS Single Parent Income Assistance Prior Abuse Client Alcohol History Client Drug History Family Under 18 Arrested Family Over 18 Arrested Failed a Grade DJJ Referral Recidivism Location -.368** (347).146** (347).149** (347) -.232** (347) -.180** (347).069 (282).017 (279).332** (288) -.814** (297) -.234** (308) Single Parent----- -.246** (347) -.234** (347) -.156** (347) -.220** (347) -.001 (282).098 (279) -.040 (288).323** (297).023 (308) Income Assistance ----- -.014 (347) -.048 (347) -.064 (347).044 (282).062 (279).071 (288) -.169** (297) -.027 (308) Prior Abuse -----.151** (347).128* (347).076 (282).200** (279).058 (288) -.111 (297).074 (308) Client Alcohol History -----.613** (347) -.002 (282) -.019 (279) -.123* (288).185** (297).033 (308) Client Drug History ----- -.053 (282).022 (279) -.047 (288).154** (297).051 (308) Family Under 18 Arrested -----.025 (272) -.005 (274) -.068 (243).086 (258) Family Over 18 Arrested ----- -.007 (275) -.016 (240).053 (255) Failed a Grade ----- -.271** (247) -.071 (262) DJJ Referral -----.185** (277)

14 2000-2001 EDIP I & II CORRELATIONS OF SELECT RISK FACTORS WITH DELINQUENCY INDICATORS Single Parent Income Assistance Prior Abuse Client Alcohol History Client Drug History Family Under 18 Arrested Family Over 18 Arrested Failed a Grade DJJ Referral Recidivism Location -.093 (268) -.109 (272).161** (272) -.187** (272) -.169* (272) -.026 (259) -.078 (260).344** (259) -.545** (243) -.079 (171) Single Parent----- -.068 (268) -.076 (268) -.108 (268) -.132* (268) -.019 (255).047 (256).089 (255).021 (239).048 (168) Income Assistance -----.065 (272) -.147* (272) -.114 (272).008 (259).086 (260) -.050 (259).061 (243) -.115 (171) Prior Abuse -----.126* (272).145* (272).043 (259).104 (260).003 (259).084 (243).016 (171) Client Alcohol History -----.692** (272).013 (259).094 (260) -.013 (259).173** (243).124 (171) Client Drug History ----- -.019 (259).129* (260) -.052 (259).231** (243).169* (171) Family Under 18 Arrested -----.066 (257).058 (253) -.079 (231) -.108 (162) Family Over 18 Arrested ----- -.044 (254).103 (232) -.029 (163) Failed a Grade ----- -.233** (232).098 (161) DJJ Referral ----- -.017 (149)

15 Improving the Odds for Kids Conclusions Prior to 2000-2001 Major differences by location Referral process questioned For latest year No empirical support for referral and location causes of recidivism Alternative Explanations? Management differences? EDIP 2 change in residential management Different philosophy b/t FSYR and EDIP

16 Improving the Odds for Kids Future Research New 3-year contract New approaches Review of ALL years Focus on structural/management change Track long-term recidivism

17 Improving the Odds for Kids Questions?

Download ppt "Improving The Odds for Kids: Tracking The Success Of An Early Delinquency Intervention Program Jeffry A. Will, The Florida Center, University of North."

Similar presentations

1 st National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and the Dependency Court Developing and Implementing Services for Children within the Substance.

1 st National Conference on Substance Abuse, Child Welfare and the Dependency Court Developing and Implementing Services for Children within the Substance.
Truancy Court Of Randolph County

Truancy Court Of Randolph County
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.

JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Using a National Jail Network to Track Probationers, Parolees & Sex Offenders Presented by: Teresa D. McKinney Division Manager - Planning & Development.

Using a National Jail Network to Track Probationers, Parolees & Sex Offenders Presented by: Teresa D. McKinney Division Manager - Planning & Development.
The Colorado Senate Bill (SB 94) Community Based Detention Program

The Colorado Senate Bill (SB 94) Community Based Detention Program
Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March 17-19.

Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March
REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.

REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP REHAB Milestones Clinical Services Options IOP Treatment Programs.
Where We Started In 1985, PACE recognized girls involved with the justice system had histories of trauma and abuse Girls were more likely than boys to.

Where We Started In 1985, PACE recognized girls involved with the justice system had histories of trauma and abuse Girls were more likely than boys to.
Multisystemic Therapy (MST)

Multisystemic Therapy (MST)
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision

Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.

Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS 919-715-2771

Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.

Mandatory Transfer to Superior Court 13 through 15 years old Class A felony offense 2 juveniles in FY 2004/05.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.

Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.

Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
1 The Effectiveness of Project Adventure's Behavior Management Programs for Male Offenders in Residential Treatment Lee Gillis Aaron Nicholson Executive.

1 The Effectiveness of Project Adventure's Behavior Management Programs for Male Offenders in Residential Treatment Lee Gillis Aaron Nicholson Executive.
Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.

Evaluation of the Connecticut Judicial Branch’s Three Court-Mandated Family Violence Programs: FVEP, EXPLORE, and EVOLVE Stephen M. Cox, Ph.D, Professor.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.

DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.

A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google