Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia."— Presentation transcript:

1 Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia

2 In Memoriam: April 16, 2007

3 Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia

4 Internet2 Land Speed Record Rich Carlson Chair I2-LSR Judging Committee

5 Internet2 Land Speed Record Competition Rules Ultimate end-to-end networking Open to everyone at anytime Minimum 10min. X 100 km x 2 routers (30,000 km maximum) TCP/IP (IPv4 and IPv6) NGI-type networks Winner must exceed previous record by 10% www.internet2.edu/lsr

6 Internet2 Land Speed Record IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream 30 December 2006 230,100 terabit-meters/second 30,000 kilometers 7.67 gigabits per second

7 Internet2 Land Speed Record IPv6 Single Stream and Multiple Stream 31 December 2006 272,400 terabit-meters/second 30,000 kilometers 9.08 gigabits per second Greater than the IPv4 I2-LSR for the first time

8 Internet2 Land Speed Record Record Setting Team The University of Tokyo WIDE Project NTT Communications et al.

9 Tokyo IPv6 servers Kei Hiraki Data Reservoir project The University of Tokyo WIDE project JGN2 NTT Communications Amsterdam

10 Thanks to All

11 History of single-stream IPv4 Internet Land Speed Record 2000200120032004200520062007 Year 1 10 100 Distance bandwidth product Pbit m / s 2004/11/9 Data Reservoir project WIDE project 149 Pbit m / s 2002 1,000 2005/11/10 240 Pbit m / s 10 Gbps * 30,000km 2006/2/20 264 Pbit m / s 2004/12/24 216 Pbit m / s

12 History of single-stream IPv6 Internet Land Speed Record 2000200120032004200520062007 Year 1 10 100 Distance bandwidth product Pbit m / s 2006/12/30 230Pbit m / s 2002 1,000 2006/12/31 272Pbit m / s 10 Gbps * 30,000km 2005/10/29 167 Pbit m / s 2005/11/13 208 Pbit m / s

13 10Gbps limitation IPv6 99% of WAN PHY bandwidth 9.06Gbps 9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame IPv4 98% of WAN PHY bandwidth 8.96Gbps 9.6Gbps OC-192 Bandwidth 9.2Gbps WAN PHY Bandwidth 9.1Gbps TCP payload with 9KB jumbo frame

14 What’s Next TCP bandwidth > 10Gbps (e.g. 11Gbps) Zero-copy software removed CPU bottleneck Possibly in a year (2007-2008) Please give us two lambdas ServerNIC 40Gs Switch Router 10G x 2 ServerNIC PCI-ex x16

15 www.internet2.edu/lsr

16 Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards David Lassner, Chair Applications Strategy Council

17 Internet2 IDEA Awards Concept Internet2 IDEA Awards recognize exemplary uses of advanced networking; those with substantial impact and benefit www.internet2.edu/lsr

18 Judging Panel David Bantz, University of Alaska Jacqueline Brown, University of Washington Lisa Childers, ANL/University of Chicago Julie Little, EDUCAUSE/ELI Jennifer Oxenford, MAGPI Art St. George, University of New Mexico Susan Scott, IHETS Brian Shepard, University of Southern California Alan Whitney, MIT Rodger Will, Ford Motor Company

19 Internet2 Driving Exemplary Applications (IDEA) Awards Ted Hanss, Chair IDEA Awards Judging Panel

20 Judging Criteria Magnitude of positive impact on current users Technical merit of the application Breadth of impact, current and expected

21 Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007 Globus MEDICUS Stephan Erberich, Director Functional Imaging and Biomedical Informatics, University of Southern California Carl Kesselman, Director Center for Grid Technology, Information Sciences Institute Ann Chervenak Assistant Professor of Computer Science, Information Sciences Institute

22 MEDICUS use cases: Childrens Oncology Group and Neuroblastoma Cancer Foundation Grids

23 Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007 UltraLight Harvey Newman, Caltech Julian Bunn, Caltech Iosif Legrand, Caltech Dan Nae, Caltech Yang Xia, Caltech Frank Van Lingen, Caltech Michael Thomas, Caltech Conrad Steenberg, Caltech Arshad Ali, National Institute for Information Technologies

24 Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007 UltraLight Fiasal Khan, National University of Science and Technology Shawn McKee, University of Michigan Paul Avery, University of Florida Richard Cavanaugh, University of Florida Dimitri Bourilkov, University of Florida Paul Sheldon, Vanderbilt University Julio Ibarra, Florida International University Heidi Alvarez, Florida International University Laird Kramer, Florida International University

25 UltraLight Don Petravick, Fermilab Les Cottrell, SLAC W. Scott Bradley, BNL Rick Summerhill, Internet2 David Foster, CERN Alberto Santoro, State University of Rio de Janeiro Sergio Novaes, State University of Sao Paulo Dongchul Son, Kyungpook National University Internet2 IDEA Award Winner 2007

26  Delivering the next generation of network-aware real-time Grids  The network as an integrated, managed resource; co-scheduled with computing and stortage  Hybrid packet-switched + dynamic optical paths  Agent-based services spanning all the layers  Leveraging US and international network partnerships;  With ESnet, USNet, KEK, Kreonet, GLORIAD, CHEPREO, WHREN/LILA, Awave, FLR, Pacific Wave, Translight, Netherlight  Extensions to Korea, Brazil, Japan and Taiwan http://ultralight.caltech.edu Led by Caltech U. Florida, FIU, UMich, SLAC,FNAL, MIT, CERN, Internet2, UERJ(Rio), USP, CENIC,Translight, Cisco

27 Four Continent Testbed Building a global, network-aware end-to-end managed real-time Grid

28 FDT – Fast Data Transfer An easy-to-use application for efficient data transfers  Written in Java (with NIO libraries), it runs on all major platforms  Uses asynch., multithreaded system to:  stream a dataset (list of files) continu- ously, through an open TCP socket  use multiple TCP streams, when necessary  use independent threads to read & write on each physical device  use appropriate size of buffers for disk I/O and networking; moderate buffer sending-rate for smooth data flow  Can resume a file transfer session  Can "plug-in" external security APIs and use them to authenticate and authorize clients: SSH, GSI-SSH, Globus-GSI, SSL  BWC: Stable disk-to-disk flows Tampa-Caltech: 10-to- 10 and 8-to-8 1U Server-pairs for 9 + 7 = 16 Gbps; then Solid overnight. Using One 10G link  17.77 Gbps BWC peak; 8.6 Gbps to and from Korea New Capability Level: ~70 Gbps per rack of low cost 1U servers I. Legrand

29 CERN Geneva CALTECH Pasadena Starlight Manlan USLHCnet Internet2 FDT Automatic Path Recovery: Fiber Cut Simulations “Fiber cut” simulations The traffic moves from one transatlantic link to the other one FDT transfer (CERN – CALTECH) continues uninterrupted TCP fully recovers in ~ 20s 1 2 3 4 FDT Transfer

30 www.internet2.edu/idea

31 Governance and Nominations Committee Update Steve Hall, Chair David Lassner, Vice-chair

32 Governance and Nominations Committee Steve Hall, Governance and Nominations Committee chair, Industry Strategy Council chair David Lassner, University of Hawaii, Applications Strategy Council chair, Governance and Nominations Committee vice-chair Mary Sue Coleman, University of Michigan Kristine Hafner, University of California Office of the President Gwen Jacobs, Montana State University Len Kleinrock, University of California Los Angeles Michael Krugman, Boston University and Northern Crossroads GigaPoP

33 Governance and Nominations Committee Larry Landweber, University of Wisconsin Madison, and Network Research Liaison Council chair David Lassner, University of Hawaii, and Applications Strategy Council chair Jack McCredie, University of California Berkeley, and Network Planning and Policy Advisory Council chair Marilyn McMillan, New York University Harvey Newman, California Institute of Technology Mike Roberts, The Darwin Group Pankaj Shah, OARnet Doug Van Houweling, Internet2, ex officio

34 Timeline Recap Summer 2006 GNC Convened by Internet2 Board December 2006 – January 2007 Draft report presented and finalized Board endorses GNC recommendations April 2007 Council nominations open May 2007 Nominations close June 2007 Member elections July 2007 New Councils take effect

35 GNC Recommended Changes 1. New Advisory Council Structure Function rather than constituency Heterogeneous membership, stratified elections 2. New Board Structure 15 members More voice from CIO’s, networks, researchers, industry 3. New Communications Structure Formalized, predictable, consistent 2-way links across the organization

36 Advisory Councils Implemented: Revised Advisory Councils Architecture & Operations Advisory Council Services Advisory Council Research Advisory Council Industry Relations Advisory Council Elected members: 3 CIO background 3 Research background 3 R&E Net background 3 Industry background Heterogeneous composition of each Council (15 per Council): 12 elected by membership at large 3 appointed by Board Open nominations GNC oversees election Membership election Council members elect chair

37 New Advisory Council Structure Heterogeneous Membership for Each Council 12 elected members: 3 researchers 3 from industry 3 from state or regional networks 3 member CIOs 3 members appointed by Internet2 (Internet2-NLR) Board *3 additional members appointed by NLR Board to represent NLR investors

38 New Advisory Council Structure Links to Management Senior Management Liaison for Each Council New “Chief Scientist” to be Liaison to Research Advisory Council Links to Board Council Chairs Serve as Voting Trustees Councils as Key Source of Policy Advice

39 Current GNC issues NLR participation on the GNC Transition of current to new Councils Constituency consultation and preparation of ballot Trusted election process Identification of chairs Criteria for and timing of appointed seats Network Researcher Task Force GNC composition and terms Getting a great set of nominees!

40 GNC Communications with Membership Biweekly GNC meetings held in March and April, focused on nominations and elections process; two summaries and Call for Nominations sent to community to date Weekly GNC meetings starting 5/1 will be focused on preparing for the election; chairs will continue to update community on progress and plans Information on GNC, Call for Nominations, and evolving FAQ: http://www.internet2.edu/about/governance/nominations.html

41 Election Process Modeled after EDUCAUSE process Voters are Executive Liaisons from member organizations in good standing Ballot form and process designed to ensure representation and participation External auditors assuring entire process is secure, private, and valid

42 Elections Schedule Nominations through 7 May Ballots distributed in late May Election 1-15 June GNC recommends individuals for Board-appointed seats on Councils NLR Board appoints additional investor seats New Councils take effect in July

43 Please Help! Nominate respected colleagues! Nominate yourself!

44 Community Update Tracy Futhey, Chair, National LambdaRail Jeffrey Lehman, Chair, Internet2

45 Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia

46


Download ppt "Spring 2007 Internet2 Member Meeting 23-26 April 2007 Arlington, Virginia."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google